Annotated Bibliography1:-
Gibson, P. R., Elms, A. N. M., & Ruding, L. A. (2003). Perceived treatment efficacy for conventional and alternative therapies reported by persons with multiple chemical sensitivity. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111(12), 1498. All The authors are working at School of Psychology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA. Therefore,This research is based on the stability of chemical treatments “conventional medicine” to check whether its reliable for many cases or some of them need to be treated y alternative medicine because, as th research results showed, they were man side effect after using some chemical treatments. Therefore, people need to change their treatments to alternative. This research found that people are …show more content…
They did some interviews and completed surveys to collect the data necessary for this study with the purpose to compare the use of the conventional and alternative medicine to heal some conditions and to provide suggestions. This study showed the conventional medicine strengths and weaknesses in comparison the alternative medicine and recommended some modalities of these treatments. However, alternative medicine was less effective because of the lack safety. Alternative medicine in compare to conventional medicine has not financial needs to control. Therefore,people use alternative medicine without careful consideration of safety issues in a universal range. The research is well written and uses formal and academic words. It explains and supports the differences between both conventional and alternative medicine conclusively. The study is reliable for the academic uses because it is peer reviewed research and it is published by the BMC Medical Research Methodology, which makes the research accurate due to publishes clinical trials and meta-analysis systemic review
Gibson, P. R., Elms, A. N. M., & Ruding, L. A. (2003). Perceived treatment efficacy for conventional and alternative therapies reported by persons with multiple chemical sensitivity. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111(12), 1498. All The authors are working at School of Psychology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA. Therefore,This research is based on the stability of chemical treatments “conventional medicine” to check whether its reliable for many cases or some of them need to be treated y alternative medicine because, as th research results showed, they were man side effect after using some chemical treatments. Therefore, people need to change their treatments to alternative. This research found that people are …show more content…
They did some interviews and completed surveys to collect the data necessary for this study with the purpose to compare the use of the conventional and alternative medicine to heal some conditions and to provide suggestions. This study showed the conventional medicine strengths and weaknesses in comparison the alternative medicine and recommended some modalities of these treatments. However, alternative medicine was less effective because of the lack safety. Alternative medicine in compare to conventional medicine has not financial needs to control. Therefore,people use alternative medicine without careful consideration of safety issues in a universal range. The research is well written and uses formal and academic words. It explains and supports the differences between both conventional and alternative medicine conclusively. The study is reliable for the academic uses because it is peer reviewed research and it is published by the BMC Medical Research Methodology, which makes the research accurate due to publishes clinical trials and meta-analysis systemic review