Argumentative Essay: Do Guns Cause Mass Violence?

Improved Essays
A shot heard in the distance. People shouting, but their panicked voices get overwhelmed with the sirens of ambulances and police cars. Screams sounded from everywhere and soon, news channels have let the whole world know about the catastrophe that occurred seconds ago. This happens almost every day in many cities. More and more of those who carry guns have decided to let everything loose and at the end, many people get lost as well. As a result of weak gun control, mass violence has become an all-too-common occurrence in the United States. Even though the news has constantly told stories elaborating on mass violence, some people still assume that no harm exists in carrying a gun. Research states that although guns do not only cause mass violence, …show more content…
According to author Frank Zimring, no matter the scenario and the instruments placed around, someone who wants to cause harm to others will find a “weapon to achieve his destructive goal” (page 721). This means that rather than stopping the purchase of guns, extra background checks should make sure the people purchasing guns can handle them properly. Though a hard problem to deal with, violence can slowly get fixed and violence rates can decrease if the hard laws put in place make it impossible for people to get away with any type of mass murder. In January 17, 1989, Patrick Edward Purdy pointed a powerful assault rifle to a crowded playground in Stockton, California, killing five children and wounding 29 others. The background check following the murder, revealed that Patrick had a history of relatively minor brushes with the law. Though this seems to not have any importance, it might prevail as the reason Patrick went over the edge and he was able to actually hurt people because he possessed a weapon. If the background check happened prior to him purchasing a gun, a crisis would have never occurred in Stockton. Stronger gun control needs to transpire in order to make sure the right people purchase guns and also for the right reasons. In April 20, 1999, “teenagers Eric Harris and Dylan Kiebold shot up Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado. They killed 13 people and wounded 21 others” (Shen). Although this crisis occurred over 16 years ago, it still holds the mystery as to how these two boys obtained a gun. Whether a handheld pistol or military style rifle, a gun remains as a gun and it has the power to kill many people. Eric and Dylan must have realized their mistake because after the massacre, they killed themselves, meaning 15 people got lost that day. None of this would have occurred if there were stronger gun control laws put in place.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Author Timothy Wheeler starts out his article with an incident happened at the Cleveland’s Success Tech Academy where four people were injured with no mortality as a result of quick elimination of the shooters. He moves on to point out the vulnerable areas of the ineffective school security and the gun free zone policy that makes school ground an easy target for psychopath killers. To prove his points, he gives us the mass murder of 1999 in Los Angeles Jewish day-care center that committed by Buford Furrow’s, and the raped and the massacre that happened between September and October 2006 in Bailey, Colorado which committed by Nickel Mines. He brings his point across that allows gun at school can be effective to stop the shooter from further executing innocent victims.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And of course, mass shooting victims account for a tiny percentage of the Americans gunned down every year. A majority of children killed by guns are killed by accident, or by their own hand, or by adults, with weapons legally obtained by adults.”. Rosenthal points out that majority of guns that have been used to commit an act of violence was obtained legally, so again the purposed solutions to gun violence will only amount to a minor change to in gun…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of them didn't have that chance that others did. Between both of them they fired 188 shots, threw 76 bombs, but only 30 exploded and 46 did not (History1900s.about.com). Witnesses later said that after the shooting had occurred both Dylan and Eric were smiling and laughing (brezina 16). After the attack, nobody knew why 2 kids from their school would do something so terrible. The students said that they both were in a clique together with a few other kids.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to a study done by Harvard’s Deborah Azrael, “roughly 40 percent” of the share of gun holders did not go through a background check” (Masters). Having a background check is an extremely important factor when buying a gun. “When background checks are required, they are extremely effective at keeping guns out of the hands of prohibited persons” (Universal Background Checks). There are any other factors that keep guns out of the wrong hands. However today, it is possible for almost anybody to get his hand on a gun.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass Shootings The anti-gun crowd would like us to believe that with more guns, comes more gun violence, but since more and more states have allowed people to carry a side arm, crime has declined. Can these things be a mere coincidence? Perhaps, but even if that’s true, it still proves that allowing law abiding citizens to be armed does not increase crime, and suggest that it contributes to lowering it instead (Federal Bureau of Investigation, n.d.). Something else to ponder is where do mass shootings occur?…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This proves that people in the United States need to go into a more mental health checkup before they can go out and purchase a weapon. Others say that they do not need to go under investigation before purchasing a weapon because they know how to own and operate their weapon in a responsible manner. Another way to help with the gun violence in America is to " insist on mandatory training and licensing along with safe-and secure gun storage" ("Gun Violence").This is saying that people have to have training and a licensing before they can own a weapon. The people will have to have a safety training and licensing before owning a weapon. The cities can also take a stand by "supporting city wide planning…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Debunking the “Guns Don’t Kill People, People Kill People” Myth." Armed With Reason. 8 Oct. 2013. Web. 14 Oct. 2015. Pearson, Michael. "…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the victim would have a much higher chance of survival. Many criminals would not be willing to go to the trouble of all this. They would not want to increase their chances of being captured by a police officer or killed in a shootout/ Another aspect is that killers many times use a gun or nothing at all. There is still the chance that people could be murdered in other ways, but many criminals will not find the situation to be worth it when they attempt to use an alternate weapon.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control Conclusion

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun Control After the Newtown, Connecticut shooting that occurred on December 14, 2012, gun control laws came in the crossfire and gun sales skyrocketed. Several people and family victims of the shooting went full force against guns after the shooting and blame the guns for the deaths on that dark, grim day. What people neglect to understand though is that guns are not alive. They have no living pulse and cannot move under their own power.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think that we should keep things like gun control and other things the same. Like for the gun control, there’s shootings and that isn't because guns are safe it's because the people using the guns the wrong way. We shouldn’t have to change our amendments for things that's not everyone fault. Like to keep our community at peace and running well we shouldn’t have to punish people for things others have committed. Like everything in our community we should keep things the same and help people more and not punish people for things they haven’t done because everyone else think it should change its our right to own a gun because it's not all used to kill human, it's used to survive if your hunting and used for many good things like to protect this country we live in.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the things a lot of political figures can’t agree on is background checks. About 60% of all gun sales in America take place without any background check whatsoever (“Background Checks...”). On average, there is also 40% of gun sales occurring under private sales with “no questions asked.” Yet there is about 90% of Americans who agree there should be background checks done in order to keep it out of the hands of a misguided person (“Brady Campaign...”). The other side of this argument of not wanting to have background checks goes back to our 2nd Amendment which states that citizens have the right to “keep and bear arms.”…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People argue and the one that everyone argue about is guns why we should have them and shouldn’t. I’m going to talk about why we should have them and there's many ways why we should and shouldn’t and we should have guns. I don’t see why people would hate guns so much but I know some reasons why they don't like guns but if they read this they might and might not like guns even though guns are good. Lots of people use guns legally, and safely, but some don’t.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays