How To Disagree With The Notwithstanding Clauses

Improved Essays
I disagree with the Notwithstanding Clause and its inconsistency with the protection of human rights and freedoms. The Charter is used as a means of protecting minorities, but in a democratic government, public policy is generally orientated towards the opinions of the majority of citizens. As a result, laws can often be unfair to minority groups (such as minority religious, ethnic, racial, or cultural groups) or other individuals outside the majority opinion. In worst-case scenarios, the majority may force these minorities to conform to the majority view. In addition, only fundamental freedoms, legal rights, and equality rights are applicable to legislative override, whereas other rights such as democratic, mobility, language, minority language

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Mavis Baker Case Summary

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Canada case in a way in which the facts are stated accurately. However, there is the possibility that a legal positivist would also explain this case in a more biased manner by considering Ms. Baker’s arguments as extraneous. By understanding how this perspective would approach this case, the connection between morality and the law can be found in the ratio, and the significance of procedural fairness can be seen as articulated through the basic rule or principle in the case. A legal positivist would agree with a majority of the courts’ assessments, except the Supreme Court of Canada’s assessment; however, the assessment of a legal positivist could also be considered as incorrect. Yet, if the legal positivist were to look at this case through a slightly different view, they would agree with the Supreme Court’s assessment and be considered correct.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, some of the rights that the courts have made no one has ever voted on them in the legislature. More than that, some of their decisions have also contradicted other already existing federal and state laws. Also, some of the rights that the courts have made no one has ever voted on them in the legislature Alternatives The Congressional Accountability Act of 1995, also referred to as the CAA, was supposed to help victims, but instead it ended up hurting many.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Newell Prindle Jr Summary

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Newell, Prindle, and Riddlesperger, Jr. coherently state thoughts about constitutions that I agree with in their statement: The flexibility inherent in [the United States Constitution] has made possible the country’s transition from a nation whose government was mainly concerned with fending off ‘hostile’ Native Americans and delivering the mail to one whose government now shoulders the burdens of world leadership and myriad socioeconomic policies. (Newell, Prindle, Riddlesperger, Jr., 55) As Texas and the nation goes into future years and decades, numerous amounts of issues will arise. These issues and dilemmas can be mended or solved with constitutional reforms and amendments.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, the political impact this case had was can a provincial act over reach their boundaries and maybe even frustrate parliament and get away with it? The case stated that the decision made by the judges favored s.6 of the provincial act over s.30 of the federal act because it fufilled the purpose more than s. 30. It led to many questions raised in this case, in whereby how far can provinces can enact their regulations in so far it does not frustrate the federal enactment. The doctrine of paramountcy is one of great complexity and requires a great analysis in truly to understand it, especially when bringing it up to court. It requires knowledge about both provincial and federal powers.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this article, the author challenges the ideals and beliefs that other scholars who study Canadian Confederation hold in regards to how confederation came about. The author's argument is that the Canadian federal state may have been a result of the debates in Britain, France and America during the eighteenth and nineteenth-century. The debate in Britain, France and America was between republican values and commercial ideology that came about at the time of Enlightenment. He believes understanding the political debates going on at the time may help gain a more rounded understanding of the political issues that were happening in Canada during the nineteenth-century post-confederation and how confederation came about through those political…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was initially subjected to the scrutiny of Anti-federalists, who believed that the document would not adequately protect the rights of those living under it (Siemers). These fears have partially been invalidated over time, as many revisions have been made in order to ensure the preservation of interests of minorities. It is imperative to recognize that these changes occurred gradually; they were not originally included in the document (Constitutional Amendment Process). Therefore, the Constitution did not succeed right away in this mission, but has done so over time through the 19th, 15th, and 14th amendments and court cases including Obergefell v. Hodges. Ratified in 1920, the 19th amendment was a progressive…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    residential schools for aboriginal children). It may have been established in such a way so that aboriginals may preserve their culture and pass it down through generations. S. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states everyone has the right to life, liberty and justice and may not be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. From my understanding, these rights may be taken away to deliver justice; so in accordance to subsection 17(5) of the Act, the rights stated in s. 7 are taken away by subsection 17(5) of the Act such that aboriginals may not lose their culture and heritage. In the case of Yves De Clerico and Madeline Haque v. Ontario (Children and Youth Services) and Justin Benoit, subsection 17(5) of the act does infringe s. 7 of the charter and cannot be justified because a) all steps have been taken by Yves De Clerico and Madeline Haque to preserve Jeffrey’s culture and heritage, and b) Yves and Madeline are better fit to be parental guardians for Jeffrey than Justin Benoit due to his lack of experience and his history of drug abuse, in addition to not being present in Jeffrey’s life, therefore there is no justice owed to him (Justin) with regards of having the right to take care of his…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Going forward on the subject of the Fourteenth Amendment we start with the Checks and Balances System. The Checks and Balances System is used to reassure that each branch of government does not get too powerful. For example the Legislative branch can put forth a bill but the Executive branch can veto the bill if found unconstitutional. Even though the Executive branch vetoed the bill the Legislative branch can override that veto and turn the bill into an amendment.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson and the others all argue most that the bill of rights undermines the idea of a constitution of enumerated powers, which means the power of the people are included in the writing of the…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Declartion of Independence does not serve as a benchmark for the actions of disfranchised people due to the lack of enforcement. “America, the home of the free.”: the American motto. How true is this motto to you? As stated in Document A; “that all men are created equal”, followed with “endowed…certain unalienable rights…Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution: Fixed or Flexible 1.The Death Penalty: Is It Constitutional? How should judges interpret vaguely worded phrases in the Constitution? The act of interpreting vaguely worded phrases in the Constitution should be frequently revised over time, according to Thomas Jefferson, in order to meet the demands of the nation, and to satisfy the public opinion at that certain time.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, as Breyer points out, different judges emphasize, on different levels, the consequences, history, language, and purpose when interpreting a statute or the Constitution (Breyer 297). It is crucial to respond to the issues the American people are facing; nonetheless, the rights provided to Americans in the Constitution cannot be taken away. However, they should be limited to protect the American people from facing the harrowing consequences of violence amendments in the Constitution allow. I would suggest a test, like the nature of the Miller Test, to see if a law or statute is taking away the full Constitutional right of an American. I believe that the test should be created by a new committee in Congress, or of a committee of independent historians selected by the Executive Branch.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Analysis

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Assess the view the Bill of rights no longer adequately protects the rights of Americans (25 marks) The first 10 amendments in the Constitution make up the Bill of Rights. The Bill of rights was written by James Madison in response to calls from several states for greater constitutional protection for individual liberties; the Bill of Rights therefore lists specific prohibitions on governmental power. A famous quote about the Bill of rights is “The Bill of Rights wasn’t enacted to give us any rights. It was enacted so the Government could not take away from us any rights that we already had.”…

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years, the United States has managed to maintain a balance between its institutional powers and personal rights of its citizens. The US constitution has undergone multiple amendments aimed at providing more freedom while the same time protects the national interests. Recently conducted studies revealed that the majority of Americans feel threaten by the decisions made by the federal government (DePlato, 2015). The paper evaluates institution powers and personal rights that the legislature should consider upholding, eliminating, or adding in a bid to balance between personal rights and national interests. The Most Important Institutional Power and Personal Right…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Any law that contradicts the fundamental human rights, such as the Nazi laws, South Africa during the apartheid era and the fugitive slave act never ought to be obeyed. Not all these unjust laws have been as obvious or as extreme as the Nazi-enacted genocide. For example, segregation laws in the United States are another example of morally unjustified laws that unmistakably violate basic human rights and freedoms by discriminations against people with certain skin colors. Having laws that do not permit individuals to eat in the same places as others or ride the same buses because of their skin color only increased the discrimination, harm and injustice caused by citizens who obeyed them. By obeying manmade laws that break more important laws that manage more long-lasting, abstract rights such as basic…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays