How The West Was Lost Stephen Aron Summary

In his book, How the West Was Lost, Stephen Aron gives explanation on the renovation of Kentucky during the lives of Daniel Boone and Henry Clay. While their lives coincided by about 40 years, they lived in very diverse worlds. Daniel Boone was a conventional backwoodsman existing in a rough shelter near Indian country, who lived off the land. Henry Clay, alternatively, moved to Kentucky to seek his commercial and manufacturing interests, and devise a plantation outside of Lexington. Aron applies this transformation to support Frederick Jackson Turner’s idea that a parade of superior civilizations will win the West, but opposed with the methodical style in which Turner describes it. In Kentucky, the take-over, colonization and consolidation …show more content…
Boone, Ohio Indians, and different Euro-American settlers had conflicted views of looking practices, however they maintained a tenuous existence within the years leading up to the American Revolutionary War. Following the Revolution, rules within the woods and thus the survival of Natives and backwoodsmen disintegrated within the wake of exaggerated settlement and land speculation. The violent contestations between Yankee settlers and Natives who had long used the fertile valleys of Bluegrass State resulted in the prohibition of Shawnee looking within the region when Dunsmore's War. The industrial desire of Kentucky's new residence exacerbated existing cultural tensions in which some may say American arrogance canceled any chance of lasting coexistence. Boone and his band of hunters, however, weren't innocent victims during this transformation from a hunter's fatherland to a land speculators paradise. He and different Anglo hunters’ profit-mindedness and conceptions of virility resulted within the forceful decline of bovid, deer, and beaver inhabitants. Finally, capitalistic trend undermined the power of Bluegrass State to stay a hunter's