President Bush 9/11 Speech Analysis

The word “terrorism”, breaking such a peaceful silence, can cause the people around you to look at you with a naked eye and a distasteful frown. Terms like these have no good reputation behind them, more likely, they strike fear into civilians and even the higher-ups. Nowadays, we know certain people and/or group(s) who wield “terror” known as terrorists and use it for the worst of things, all resulting into more chaos and tragedy. To be more specific, these results pertain to blowing up a certain structure and killing a mass amount of innocent people to get a point through; very broad analogies, but it summarizes how the act of terror could be used for. This inflicts not only the innocent and helpless lives being taken, but the country itself and the representatives that reflect the country. …show more content…
In the speeches one made by President Bush and another by President Obama, it is clear to see the propositions and claims are different in a specific sense, but they do fall in the same line of curing the acts of terror and revenge, mainly caused by the incident of 9/11. President Bush’s speech has a continual trend of revenge shared in his assertions of strengthening America, fallacies that depends on the audience’s perspective, but mostly, the tone gives off this feeling the most. President Obama’s speech reflects more on pathos for imagery, trying to bring back those depressing and blurry feeling during the incident of 9/11, so he can revolve it around his triumphant success in "self-accomplishing" and "self-leading" the assassination of Osama Bin