Carr writes “We need to give our minds more room to think. And that means putting some distance between ourselves and our phones.” Observe how he says words like “we, our, ourselves.” This makes the reader feel as though they are included. “Smartphones have become so entangled with our existence that, even when we’re not peering or pawing at them, they tug at our attention, diverting precious cognitive resources.” This appeals to the reader’s emotion when he says “our existence.” Carr also writes “Now that our phones have made it so easy to gather information online, our brains are likely off-loading even more of the work of remembering to technology.” He repeatedly says our which, again, makes the reader feel included. Inclusive language strengthens his claim that “smartphones are hijacking our minds” because it doesn’t single out anyone; it makes the reader feel as though they
Carr writes “We need to give our minds more room to think. And that means putting some distance between ourselves and our phones.” Observe how he says words like “we, our, ourselves.” This makes the reader feel as though they are included. “Smartphones have become so entangled with our existence that, even when we’re not peering or pawing at them, they tug at our attention, diverting precious cognitive resources.” This appeals to the reader’s emotion when he says “our existence.” Carr also writes “Now that our phones have made it so easy to gather information online, our brains are likely off-loading even more of the work of remembering to technology.” He repeatedly says our which, again, makes the reader feel included. Inclusive language strengthens his claim that “smartphones are hijacking our minds” because it doesn’t single out anyone; it makes the reader feel as though they