Father Son Relationship In King Henry IV

Superior Essays
This week’s first lecture began by us watching a short clip of Richard the II that was performed by sir john Gilbert. Richard the II was the first play in Shakespeare’s second tetralogy, Henry IV is the second play in the sequence. We talked briefly about the plot of Richard II and how Bolivar became king Henry IV. We then talked about the beginning of Henry IV in which the king is being plotted against due to his apparent forgetting of debts due, and his son whom behaves in a non-royal manner hanging out with thieves and commoners. We mentioned the idea that the central hero of Shakespeare’s historical plays was England itself always being tempted or assailed. The more apparent central character in this tetralogy is young prince Hal who goes …show more content…
There are several father son relationships throughout, such as hotspur and Northumberland, Hal and the King, as well as the relationship between Falstaff and Hal which is similar to that of a father and son. We looked at a scene in which Falstaff and Hal engaged in a bit of roleplay to act out the conversation between Hal and his father the king. In this Falstaff acts as the king berating Hal’s choice of friends and his bearing of course with the exception of himself of course, Hal then chooses to have them switch places as he does not believe his father would not speak of Falstaff in such a way. This conversation leads to Hal berating Falstaff in the guise of the king and Falstaff determined to defend himself in the guise of Hal. We talked about how this conversation has a much deeper meaning in that Hal knows he must change his lifestyle and remove Falstaff from his party of friends when he needs to step up and change the perception of the people. We then spoke about the opposite temptation that prince Hal was experiencing pulling him between good and evil in a sense. There are the destructive temptations posed by Falstaff which are the vices of the flesh such as women and wine, as well as the spiritual temptations represented by Hotspur such as impulsiveness and anger. These forces are counterbalanced by the call to duty of his father and country to become a better symbol for the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 128.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pacino’s ambition to “communicate a Shakespeare that is how we think and how we feel today” leads him to orchestrate his interpretation of Richard’s identity and, in process, manipulate his own identity to present this adaptation to his audience. Pacino revaluates Richard’s exaggerated deformity as not a consequence of opposing the divine order but rather a ‘metaphorical representation of the inner corruption of his mind’. Through the cinema verite of Richard in black attire, shadows and limping, the dramatic characterisation reveals the pernicious state of his mind. Pacino uses enigmatic tone of repetitive voice, “an amorous looking glass cheated of feature by deformed…deformed…deformed” to reveal Richard’ internally fragmented self accompanied with eclectic editing style. As the Elizabethan tyrant is made more relevant to the modern audience, it reveals the audience’s freedom to conclude the guilty conscience, rather than presuming punishments lead to a devaluation of Richard’s authentic power.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Richard 's death reveals a final truth that divine retribution is a more powerful reality than the interwoven lies that Richard has spread. Shakespeare has highlighted the significance of appearance and reality in relation to the human condition and condemns Richard 's use of it as he subverts the Tudor…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Accordingly, in examining the desire for freewill in both contexts, the audience are invited to witness the important of loyalty to both protagonists. As reflected in Richard III, Shakespeare disproves Richard’s…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With Goldman’s incorporation of idiolect throughout his varying sentence style, the reader becomes a bystander within the palace walls, listening to every plot and conspiracy comprising the drama’s central conflict of determining England’s next king. Not only does idiolect show the level of education behind a character, but their use of English and French also conveys the characters’ education and professionalism concerning England’s political situation. With his use of both idiolect and foreign language, Goldman gives the reader insight as to who may be the best deceivers within the drama’s deceptive battles. However, despite the trickery and slyness pervading the subject, the prideful and selfish roots of deceit are clearly found to be inherently fixed into each character’s personality. For example, when Richard warned Henry that he will be king in any situation, he said, “I don’t care what you offer Philip.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This idea is conveyed in act 1 scene 3 when Hotspur talks to King Henry about Mortimers capture. Shakespeare represents King Henry…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The genre of Henry V is comedy. There is enough witty remarks in this paper for a few plays. From Shakespeare’s ironic dilemmas to characters having comedic dialogues and physical actions. In the rising action there are harmonizing conflicts then down the road in the climax there is Henry’s disguise. Despite all of the deaths, this plays shows more comedy characteristics than any other.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry V Changing Tides

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Henry V is full of confusion and changing tides. The play opens up with the king Henry V who used to be the wild Prince Hal in Pt. 1 of Henry IV, but now he is a valiant and aggressive monarch who does what is “right” for his English nation. History goes back and forth between who should rightfully have the French crown: the English or the French? The English army also fluctuates between honorable men fighting a glorious war and those who are fearful and doubtful of the war’s necessity.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet Essay Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy, Hamlet (1892) is a prevailing text, which encompasses perennial concerns not only applicable to the elizabethan era, but also to our contemporary society, enabling us as a critical audience to successfully engage with Hamlet as a character. As a result of corruption, Hamlet is perceived as an afflicted character struggling to live in a world of complex appearances and paradoxical actions. Consequently, his overwhelming desire and reason for filial revenge is instigated, reflecting the intricate nature of the human condition in the undertaking of his vengeance. Moreover, these prominent concerns are cohesively resonated throughout the text, thus establishing textual integrity and further heightening the plays enduring effect.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    At the beginning of the play, the King says about his son, “Yea, there thou mak’st me sad, and mak’st me sin / In envy that my Lord Northumberland / Should be the father to so blest a son, / A son who is the theme of Honor’s tongue..” (Shakespeare 890). He is jealous of the Lord Northumberland’s son because his son is so honorable, while his, Prince Hal, is not honorable at all.…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Falstaff's Honor

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The battlefield is not a venue for honor, but a playground; the highway is not for traveling, but for thieving; the throne is not for a king, but for a drunk. Thus, the movement of I Henry IV is not Hal’s rise to royalty, but his tragic loss of the most essential human quality, passion for life; in Falstaff, Shakespeare’s play finds not simply comic relief but an antidote to the power and corruption that threaten the fragile conception of what it is to be a living…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the surface King Richard II seems a straightforward depiction of an unfit King’s steady stream towards being deposed. Shakespeare’s lack of favoritism gives a documentary point of view, yet commotional drama of a daytime soap opera. Shakespeare’s elegant style leaves some doubt for the reader to be ‘all in’ with Bolingbroke taking over despite his heroic attributes and the follies of Richard. The play opens with King Richard’s continuing follies: covers up his Gloucester’s assassination, banishing Mowbray and Bolingbroke, ignoring wise advice of John of Gaunt, arrogantly stealing his Duke’s assets to fund his own conquest abroad, and vastly underestimating the support Bolingbroke is receiving when Richard is abroad. Be that as it may,…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the entirety of Henry IV Part 1, by William Shakespeare, there is an emphasis on father-son relationships. The main protagonist, Hal, and the main antagonist, Hotspur, are both young men and as such they are still learning from their respective father figures. In Hal’s case, both Falstaff and his biological father King Henry IV, and for Hotspur, Northumberland. Each relationship has its merits and faults, and its own intricacies not seen in any of the other bonds. Though the the plot centers mainly around Hal and the king, each out these links are integral to understanding what happened and why.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    "Talking Shakespeare." Gordonsville, US: Palgrave Macmillan (2000): 9. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 1 Nov. 2016.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although, as Richard the Third, both Laurence Olivier and Benedict Cumberbatch speak straight to the camera in a fashion that makes the viewer feel as if they are complicit in their plots and schemes, and although both costumes show physical indications of Richard’s deformity, the two portrayals tell a considerably different story about Richard’s wicked origins. Laurence Olivier’s Richard is an infamous legend; the film does its best to tell a story about one of many in search of the English Crown. The psychological reasons for Olivier’s Richard are almost nonexistent. On the other hand, Benedict Cumberbatch’s Richard delves deeper into the psychological reasons for Richard’s actions, largely centered around his deformity.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays