Typically the topic of arguments, political debates, and disagreements, policing and corrections always seem to raise diversified emotions amongst individuals. It is not uncommon for ones perspective on the subject to be swayed based on political stance, financial stability, community, race, gender, religion, ethnicity, or several other distinctive attributes. These distinguishing qualities may be the reason someone supports stringent policing procedures such as Stop and Frisk or be opposed to them. In the same token, these characteristics could also be the reason an individual is singled out by police to enforce these assertive policies.
Public safety, we can all agree, is important for the wellbeing of our communities and protection of societies. …show more content…
In regards to adolescents and their maltreatment on Rikers Island, it is plausible that Mayor de Blasio should encourage the Department of Corrections to separate these young offenders from older inmates and encourage education to assist in rehabilitation rather than confinement and captivity. It should also be required that Correctional Officers be retrained on proper conduct and unbiased treatment of all inmates rather than frequently resorting to unwarranted excessive force. The stop and frisk law should be reevaluated the way Mayor de Blasio has commenced with input from communities that have been negatively and positively impacted by execution of this act. It is important to fairly and honestly revisit the purpose of the stop and frisk regulation and its effectiveness on crime. Stop and frisk has surpassed acceptable boundaries by attempting to sway the opinions of communities impacted that the government has implemented this law for the safety of all, but has proven to be a vehicle for legally allowing racial profiling. The conditions on Rikers Island, use of stop and frisk, and broken windows policing all play a major role in public safety and our public respect for government and the law. It is standard for officials to disagree with how the rehabilitation system or policing should be controlled; however, it is important to keep the morality of humans and the social contract at the forefront of our implementation of the
Public safety, we can all agree, is important for the wellbeing of our communities and protection of societies. …show more content…
In regards to adolescents and their maltreatment on Rikers Island, it is plausible that Mayor de Blasio should encourage the Department of Corrections to separate these young offenders from older inmates and encourage education to assist in rehabilitation rather than confinement and captivity. It should also be required that Correctional Officers be retrained on proper conduct and unbiased treatment of all inmates rather than frequently resorting to unwarranted excessive force. The stop and frisk law should be reevaluated the way Mayor de Blasio has commenced with input from communities that have been negatively and positively impacted by execution of this act. It is important to fairly and honestly revisit the purpose of the stop and frisk regulation and its effectiveness on crime. Stop and frisk has surpassed acceptable boundaries by attempting to sway the opinions of communities impacted that the government has implemented this law for the safety of all, but has proven to be a vehicle for legally allowing racial profiling. The conditions on Rikers Island, use of stop and frisk, and broken windows policing all play a major role in public safety and our public respect for government and the law. It is standard for officials to disagree with how the rehabilitation system or policing should be controlled; however, it is important to keep the morality of humans and the social contract at the forefront of our implementation of the