How Not To Read The Constitution Summary

Improved Essays
Sitting in the National Archives in Washington D.C. lives the most important document when it comes to our country and United States government. Professor Laurence H. Tribe and Michael C. Dorf are authors of the article “How Not to Read the Constitution”. Both have worked with the United States Supreme Court and teach Constitutional Law. Working together, these men have studied and have taken interest in the document that formed our country, the Constitution, trying to piece together a giant mystery, a puzzle that needs to be completed. This piece of paper was signed by a group of men filled with a want to forget the mistake of the Articles of Confederation, a gargantuan governmental mistake, wanting to start anew. Signed on September 17th, 1787 this document is the shortest of constitutions, there are still many questions that need to be answered. This goes to show that maybe our forefathers and first government leaders gave us all this puzzle to complete, open to opinions. How Not to Read …show more content…
It is a giant mystery why the Constitution has many loose ends and instructions without clear detail. Liberal Justice White and conservative Justice William Rehnquist both agreed that there is no fixed meaning to this piece of paper. There is a difference between writing and reading. Our forefathers were writing their wishes and dreams of what they wanted our government to look like not only then, but in the future as well. Are we as readers fulfilling their dreams by reading the Constitution as they wished or wrote it? Are we just confusing it? As humans we interpret things how we wish to see them based on our values and our views could be very different from the person next to us. Should we take every single little word of the Constitution seriously or leave it up to interpretation? That is your

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The internal struggles and unsuccessful Articles of Confederation displayed the perilous situation America was in without a shared national identity. It was out of necessity for the Constitution to developed on their revolutionary principles (343). Furthermore, The Constitution was adopted as the national identity until one developed. The Constitution, the founding fathers, and their documents were deified by Americans. Americans studied, wrote, praised, and debated the constitution, but more importantly they endorsed the constitution’s…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the failures of the Articles of Confederation, it was clear to the members of the Second Constitutional Convention that serious revisions to our government were necessary to have a prosperous nation. Thus the Constitution, with clear distinctions to the Articles, was drafted. James Madison, often cited as the Father of the Constitution, in conjunction with several other Federalist, like Alexander Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to persuade members of Congress and the states to ratify the document. Noted by history as two of the most influential pieces from the collection, The Federalist Papers, Federalist 10 and Federalist 51 stand out by there clear and persuasive arguments as to why and how a strong national government would protect its citizens.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Constitution Dbq

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States Constitution was written over the course of nearly four months and quickly became the most important document in U.S. history. Many of this historic document’s ideals can be found in two very important documents from the past. Both of these documents contained public rulers transferring their power to the people.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, the document was intentionally weakened and setup for failure by its writers, who soon came to realize that a strong central government was necessary for national unity. The weaknesses that the Articles of Confederation introduced into the United States were largely repaired by the Constitution, and one can see the difference in the documents’ longevity through their life-spans: The Articles of Confederation lasted 7 years and the Constitution has continued to thrive for over 227 years! The stability and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution reflect a document created out of years of trial-and-error, one that signifies the very nature of…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the federal level, the Constitution set a division among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches; locally the government must be granted permission by the state and the governing bodies are directly elected by the people. In total it left the maximum amount of freedom in the hands of individuals. This being said, a common concern among many in today’s society is whether or not a document that was written 229 years ago can still remain relevant in a world that is frequently changing. The Constitutions relevancy is based on the fact that it is a living document written with the possibility of amendments that allows for interpretation by the judicial system, that its purpose is to protect against dictatorship and usurping of power brought up by Anti-Federalist fears, and that it ultimately serves as a protective barrier for citizens’ civil…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel Shay Rebellion

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The constitution itself was made for the people by the people. “ We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice…”. The whole goal of America in the beginning was to make the Union…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amended over the years, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, fundamental law of the nation. But the generalized language of the Constitution is designed according to the doctrines set forth in the Declaration. For more than two centuries the galvanizing phrases of the Declaration have inspired people around the world. When it came time to draft a new constitution, the Founding Fathers drew upon the principles they had outlined in the Declaration. The Declaration and the Constitution, together, address mankind's most basic political questions, but while they work together to articulate America’s political organization, the Declaration has always been the basis and stronger of the two pieces of American history.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The American constitution could not stay pure in the hands of imperfect human beings”. The premise of this statement is false due to the fact that it is quite contradictory. This statement declares human beings to be “imperfect”, and human beings created the constitution, there is no possible way that the Constitution was “pure” in the first place. Human beings are mortal and lack foresight as well as divine knowledge. At times humans acknowledge this and account for it, but more often than not humans, the pretentious beings they are, do not account for any possibility of mistakes.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All told, this constitution is far too vague for its own good. The constitution begins by establishing the legislative branch of government. There is very little ambiguity to this first article of the constitution. It creates a bicameral congress, and explains how each house of this congress will be selected and by whom.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Federalist Alexander Hamilton regarded the Constitution as the fundamental law, which is superior to any state statute, and as a limited Constitution. In Federalist Paper Number 78, Hamilton argues that the Supreme Court should have the authority to invalidate acts of Congress that are deemed unconstitutional, and that if there is a variance between the Constitution and a law passed by Congress, federal courts have the responsibility to follow the Constitution. Paper Number 78, having been cited in thirty-seven Supreme Court opinions as of April 2007, has had an immense influence on the debate regarding the interpretation and application of the Constitution (Coenen). Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is an advocate of textualism, arguing that the meaning of the Constitution lies in the words of the document, and that the Constitution should be regarded in favor of its “original meaning”. Justice Stephen…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us now consider the other side of the coin, the argument in favor of a dead Constitution. In 2008; Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said at the Manhattan Institute, "Let me put it this way; there are really only two ways to interpret the Constitution -- try to discern as best we can what the framers intended or make it up. No matter how ingenious, imaginative or artfully put, unless interpretive methodologies are tied to the original intent of…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without it where would we be today in life if it was not for you? What would the outcome be of violence? How would we resolve situations dealing with the government? Does it even bring peace in today’s society? Would we still be allowed to voice our opinions or how we feel?…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States Constitution was created to replace the weak Articles of Confederation. John Adams understood and was restrained from taking action to secure and enforce a commerce treaty with Britain in 1783. Even levying taxes seemed almost impossible as it took unanimous approval from all states to ratify laws. It took three years of waiting for Congress to abandon a tax of five percent on all imported goods which was blocked by Rhode Island. This was a common problem as Rakove points out that Congress had insufficient power to structure and maintain foreign policy.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Philadelphia Convention, where the new Constitution was developed, not all the men agreed on ratifying the document. Even though, the Article of Confederation was already demolished, with the new Constitution, many men still believed that it should have not been replaced, but simply changed. As the men were divided, the Federalist Papers served as an logical and different perspective for the document. In the second article, it states, “Distinguished members of that Congress, who have been since tried and justly approved for patriotism and abilities, and who have grown old in acquired political information, were also members of this convention, and carried into it their accumulated knowledge and experiences.” The quote describes the men who were involved in the creation of the Constitution, are highly impeccable and were the same ones who created the Article of Confederation; thus, their recommendation for this document should be taken into consideration.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays