How Is President Washington A Turning Point

Improved Essays
The election of President Washington was not a turning point in the American political party system, due to the lack of changes in the system as a direct result of his election; rather, the election of Thomas Jefferson as president served as a focal turning point in the change of the political party system in America because of the way it introduced changes that would gradually begin altering the system.

The election of President Washington was not a turning point in the political party system of America. At the time of George Washington’s election, the Federalist and Antifederalist schools of thought had already been fully developed, and did not change due to Washington’s election. A few years later, these groups were replaced by the Federalist
…show more content…
Thomas Jefferson began a massive shift of power from the Federalists to the Republicans that would lead to the eventual disintegration of the Federalists. The first way Jefferson’s election did this was through the striking down of many Federalist policies, such as repealing the Judiciary Act of 1801, which got rid of 40 Federalist judicial positions that John Adams had filled last-minute before Jefferson took over as president. Actions such as the aforementioned helped Jefferson to gain more leverage for his agenda as president. However, Jefferson did keep quite a few economic policies established by the Federalists, most notably the Bank of the United States, which he had once spoken out against as unconstitutional. Such tolerance to important Federalist ideals began to make the two parties more similar to one another, as Jefferson’s radical Republican policies became more moderate. This new control over the political party system and the moderation of Republican policies led to two more Republican presidents being elected and allowing this dominance to continue, James Madison and James Monroe. The continued Republican anti-British sentiment eventually led to the War of 1812, which the Federalists vehemently opposed. This further led to the downfall of the Federalists, as the war was a huge success, undermining the main point of argument that the Federalists had defined themselves with for the entire duration …show more content…
This turning point in the collapse of the Federalists in the First Party System can be likened to the collapse of the Whig Party in the Third Party System. Just as the Federalists began losing ground gradually to the Republicans, beginning to come only in second place, the Whigs did as well with the Democrats. The Whigs then made the same fatal mistake as the Federalists: having a lack of identity. As the Federalists clung to being anti-War of 1812 which eventually fell apart, the Whigs had split views on slavery, which eventually led to their falling apart. The Federalists had no radically unique views after peace was made with Britain, as the Republicans were significantly more moderate and held beliefs similar enough to those of the Federalists for them to identify with that party as well. In the same way, the Whigs disintegrated due to their lack of unity - in this case, on the topic of slavery, which was an extremely important issue at the time. By this point, the emerging Republican Party and the well-established Democratic Party had unique views on both sides of the issue, leading most Whigs to be able to identify with one party or the other, causing the party to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson understood this, and during his presidency tried to improve the nation any way possible—using both federalist and democratic-republican policies. In spite of this, Borden believes that biographers have too often taken “the popular view of Jefferson and his enemies” and “missed or misconstrued the reality” (40). The best example, Jefferson and Adams, had disagreements, but Borden points out that they were also similar. They both wanted “to avoid war, to quiet factionalism, to preserve republicanism” (42). Fittingly, from 1812 to 1826, Adam’s and Jefferson’s friendship renewed through a series of “masterful” correspondences (42).…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was because Republicans were dominating the American Supreme Court who were opposed to the New Deal and denied democracy by throwing out laws that Roosevelt had been elected to pass. Also it was not that he took over the power and used it for his own, he used it to settle down the US depression as soon as…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Zinn, he argues that the American Revolution did not result in any major changes in the new nation and the main reason for this war was for the wealthy individuals to gain power and benefit from the common people. He goes further to explain that the Founding Fathers were not concern for anyone else other themselves and only emulated the British’s control and attitude the British had toward the colonists. “Were the Founding Fathers wise and just men trying to achieve a good balance? In fact, they did not want a balance, except one which kept things as they were, a balance among the dominant forces at that time. They certainly did not want an equal balance between slaves and masters, propertyless and property holders, Indians and white” (Zinn 101).…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1800 Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republicans won back the presidency from the Federalist they claimed that it was a revolution and that they would be guardians of “agrarian purity, liberty and state rights”(The American Pageant). They believed that the Federalist had brought a bureaucracy to the newly founded nation and had betrayed the ideals of the American Revolution. Though Jefferson claimed he would do away with the Federalist actions like Alexander Hamilton’s bank he actually maintained the economic framework to help keep the prosperity for the newly founded nation. Jefferson however did get rid of some federalist economic ideals and had a very opposing view of how the deal with the debt the country faced. When it came to foreign…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These two violent acts were the last straw and the Patriots decided it was time to go to work. The revolutionary war has now begun, at first the Patriots didn't know that they were fighting for their freedom at first, they were just fighting for less taxes. After a while when Parliament passed the Declaration of Independence it became a fight for freedom, this turned many more Colonists towards the Patriots efforts for the freedom of the United States of America. This just goes to show how the relationship between Britain and the American Colonies drastically changed from the time after the French and Indian war because of a series of events caused by the greediness of Britain. Yes, Britain did need money because they were in debt because of the French and Indian war but the colonists did not think they should be responsible for this debt so, they did something about it.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They had many differences, but they shared many large similarities; most colonists were quite religious, the colonies had economically stable middle classes, and all the colonists are British people living in the New World. Although they had their differences, their similarities are what allowed them to band together to really oppose the King and Parliament. If they were completely different from one another there would be nothing connecting them, which would never allow for a cohesive revolution. Their differences cannot be ignored, though, which leads to the conclusion that if colonists could join each other to rid themselves of an old, corrupted government, then the Revolution can almost be justified. This, in a way, makes the revolution seem radical, because all these people from different backgrounds were coming together to change the system they were being oppressed…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The period after the War of 1812 was christened the Era of Good Feelings because of the nationalistic spirit, high morale, and unfamiliar cooperation among politicians that flourished during the time. Following the War of 1812, the Democratic-Republicans established an essentially one-party system, embracing some of the policies of the inactive Federalist Party and thereby eliminating hostility between the two parties. Although there was a rising spirit of nationalism and morale, the Era of Good Feelings was also marked by sectionalism, divisions within the Democratic-Republican Party, and strife over tariffs, the national bank, and internal improvements. The growing sectionalism can be attributed to both the friction between the North and…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Napoleon was therefore seen as a progressive and thusly favored by a sizable portion of the British public. Even though the two nations were at war, ideologies were able to travel across the English Channel in both directions, fueling a progressivist fervor in the British Radical party which was most definitely vocal and thusly heard. The Loyalist party, however, attacked Napoleon’s character on the basis of illegitimacy. He was certainly an emperor in terms of power and influence, but Loyalists, whose rhetoric has since become hegemonic and embedded in Western prisms, claimed that his rule was undeserved—that he was not born into his position as was expected of a king. The common argument against Napoleon’s character in my anecdotal environment has been that of a monster who took his emperorship by bloody force during the 18 Brumaire coup.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democratic Republicans had compromised so much that members of it 's own party spoke against Madison. Tensions rode high within their party and hostility remained, "[W]e have another proof that the present government have renounced the true republican principles of Jefferson 's administration on which they raised themselves to power, and that they have taken up, in their stead, those of John Adams..." (Doc F). Outlining the true amount of appeasement Madison ruled with, John Randolph goes as far to compare Madison to John Adams, a prominent Federalist, and condemn Madison for forsaking Jefferson 's achievements. Randolph hoped to stop the proposed tariff of 1816, appealing especially to the Democrats who wanted to preserve a Democratic government. Jefferson strongly…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison served as President Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state and both had Republican views and beliefs. They were confident that in order for America to progress, less government would lead the way to victory. Their position on having a National Bank as well as a large Army and Navy were seen as being unnecessary and could threaten economic liberty. In order to go to war with England it would be imperative for a rapid and massive expansion of the Army and Navy which would require money from the National Bank. The harassment of American shipping increased and continued with both Britain and France, which left Madison with no choice after failure of diplomacy.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays