According to O’Byrne natural law, “had less to do with the rights of all peoples per se than with the relationship between a citizen and a state.” (page 38, O’Byrne, 2003) Natural law helps regulate the way an individual should act, but it creates inequality within the social system. Universal human rights heavily contradict this idea of natural law by giving all humans equal rights and cutting out the key relationship between sovereign and state. This also creates the problem of individuals powering over national laws that are created by the state. Universal human rights not only contradict natural law but also creates conflicts with cultural backgrounds and beliefs by ignoring cultural differences. All these rights may apply to one culture but have nothing to do with another. Often times universal rights are only really meant for those part of a western society. That leads to many asking are human rights really
According to O’Byrne natural law, “had less to do with the rights of all peoples per se than with the relationship between a citizen and a state.” (page 38, O’Byrne, 2003) Natural law helps regulate the way an individual should act, but it creates inequality within the social system. Universal human rights heavily contradict this idea of natural law by giving all humans equal rights and cutting out the key relationship between sovereign and state. This also creates the problem of individuals powering over national laws that are created by the state. Universal human rights not only contradict natural law but also creates conflicts with cultural backgrounds and beliefs by ignoring cultural differences. All these rights may apply to one culture but have nothing to do with another. Often times universal rights are only really meant for those part of a western society. That leads to many asking are human rights really