Having extensively researched both Medieval Europe and Feudal Japan, I conclusively maintain a preference to live in Feudal Japan. This is due to Japan’s superior social, military and medical frameworks as opposed to Medieval Europe's underdeveloped and primitive society. It is because of Feudal Japan’s pragmatic and intuitive societal construct that makes it my undeniable choice of residence.
Feudal Japan's healthcare and sanitation system was far more contextually advanced than Medieval Europe in question. Europeans bathed on average twice a year, whereas the Japanese would bathe almost daily. The Japanese culinary approach was far more sanitary and more cautious than the Europeans. This enabled them to maintain a healthier environment, as their habitat surrounding food had fewer health effects than Medieval Europeans. The Japanese had many medicinal treatments available as many medicines prescribed had been developed from traditional Chinese …show more content…
This means that one would have been safer and more protected in the Japanese society, rather than Medieval Europe which did not have a secure or solid framework. In Japan, both men and women had the opportunity to become samurai warriors - meaning that Japan had the advantage of another gender potentially doubling their warrior count. Defence systems in Japan were strong, as armies were larger and more diverse than the smaller, more disadvantaged armies of Europe. The infrastructure in Japan was far more superior than Europe. Japanese castles were generally built on mountainous terrain and contained steep stairways to prevent easy access from unwanted visitors. Robust materials were used and the castles had a solidified and fortified existence as opposed to the European defence. As warfare was imminent in this time of change, it was preferable to live in an area where military and defence was