Charles Darwin's Theory Of Evolution Flawed

Once said by Charles Darwin, “A moral being is one who is capable of reflecting on his past actions and their motives- of approving of some and disapproving of others” With that said, his theory of evolution is flawed and being a moral being disapproving of the actions of his theory is something that we as a society can do. There are four points in his theory that is flawed. The first is the failure of molecular biology to provide evidence for a grand “tree of life. The second flaw is the failure of chemistry to explain the origin of the genetic code. The third flaw is the use of embryology to support evolution. Lastly, evolution could never happen at all according to the laws of thermodynamics. With all the information to be presented, let’s …show more content…
As stated by the Missouri University of Science and Technology’s Gary Bertrand, “The First Law of Thermodynamics states that the energy of the universe is constant. The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the entropy [lack of predictability] of the universe cannot decrease.” Now moving into evolution; with the second law of thermodynamics, due to earth is an open system therefore not closed to show a lack of outside forces. This is commonly used in hypothetical situations to show the problem without outside resistance. According to the equation of thermodynamics, “the influx of heat into an open system will increase the entropy, not decrease it.” This shows that in order for evolutions and more simply put mutations, could not happen because they are not organizing but throwing the normal out the window. As stated by Henry M Morris, Ph.D., “Natural selection cannot generate order, but can only "sieve out" the disorganizing mutations presented to it, thereby conserving the existing order, but never generating a new order.” It may seem confusing but look at it from a different perspective. As a wheel turns on the pavement, it picks up sand and dirt this can be considered the mutation of the tire. As time goes on the tire has accumulated so much sand and dirt that it becomes the new norm for the tire to have those things on it and is considered normal. This is held constant until something else comes along and starts where the dirt and sand started. After looking at the different points in proving that evolution is flawed it is easy to say that there are flaws in this