How Has Russia Changed Over Time Essay

Great Essays
How have perceptions of communism in Russian society changed over time? What were the factors leading to these changes?

Karl Marx was a German philosopher and economist, who published the Communist Manifesto in 1848. He was an influential writer and in his writing he conveys the idea of communism and how the proletariat will ultimately gain political power. That the abolition of private property will result in a society with no classes, hence no class antagonism. Marx suggests that having the right to private property is what causes capitalism to exist in the first place. Capitalism leads to the proletariat becoming heavily dependent on the Capitalist. They have power over the working class, since they own private property, have the ability to gain more resources, capital, and money, which they use to exploit the working class. As Capitalism progresses, class antagonism increases, because the capitalist get wealthier and the people from the proletariat class are transformed into insignificant fragile commodities that are living under increasingly harsh conditions. In order for a class to maintain power and for class struggle to exist, one must have power over the other class.
…show more content…
He developed Marx philosophy using his perspective on Russia. Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, also known as Lenin, was the first leader of the communist party in one of the world’s largest countries. He helped to overthrow Tsar Nicholas II in 1917 and is the founder of the Soviet Union in Russia. In order to understand the rise of Lenin and the communist party in Russia, it is important to emphasize the living conditions that prevailed in Russia under the rule of Nicholas II, the last Tsar. Nicholas II was an oppressive emperor, who was unable to maintain control over Russia without harming society. He was a bloody tyrant, who enslaved countless people. Working conditions were heavy and there was very minimal workers

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    During the period 1855 – 1956 Russia was involved in many major wars, all of which played an important role in its development. With the exception of the Second World War many of the wars Russia was involved led to defeats for them and these defeats exposed the weakness of the Tsar or government in charge. War outlined the flaws in the presiding system and highlighted Russia’s faults, and thus placed a spotlight upon the shortcomings of the Russian leadership. Such pressure prompted the Tsars and other leaders to react and change in order to appease a nation on the brink of an oncoming revolution therefore Trotsky’s statement that ‘war was a locomotive of Russian history’ is true as it led to significant changes such as the Emancipation of the Serfs and the Abdication of Tsar Nicholas.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Russian Revolution Dbq

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Russian population gave up on the ideals of a tzar or an absolute monarchy. They felt that the people in Russia got no say in the government and the government is only by the tzar for the tzar. Many of the Russian people were looking for different governments and many thought that communism was the best choice of government for Russia. To understand why the rise of communism was helped lead the Russian’s chant of “Peace, Bread, and Land” we have to look at Russia before revolution. From the source written by the Russian Conservative, who were a bunch of members from the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th dumas, stated in their journal “The Months Before the Russian Revolution” “The war failures, the tension which is getting too much of us, the general exhaustion, which is plainly developing into a refusal to go with the war.”…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx’s view of private property is significantly differently than what we view as private property today. He believed that private property was ownership of productive property. This is property that is producing a profit for the owner. Marx felt that government should control property and that all should share in the work and reward of the property. Whereas men like John Locke and Thomas Jefferson believed that ownership of property was for important for a good government.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autocracy In Russia Essay

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For the first time, workers who were once peasants now had cultural opportunities like evening classes, clubs, libraries, theatres, and mass entertainment, and in addition to that they became exposed to the political ideas of Social Democrats and Socialist Revolutionaries.4 These political ideas were captivating when the working class began to directly feel the crippling effects of modernization and the strains of WW1. Inflation had taken hold of the economy and as prices rose—sometimes tripled—wages remained unchanging, forcing a widespread hunger amongst the working class across the country. “The wretched conditions in which workers lived and their pitiful wages heightened their sense of separateness not only from the government but from privileged society in general,” and made the socialist ideas of regime change all too alluring. The government had a hope of introducing modernization while still keeping a firm hand of control over society, yet the effects of modernization which consisted of industrialization, urbanization, internal migration, and the introduction of various new social classes only served to further dismantle and wash away the autocratic foundations of the Tsarist regime.2 This collapse in the autocratic foundation through a crisis in modernization was the first step to allowing Lenin and the Bolshevik party to eventually gain control of the Russian…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argues that to prevent the exploitation of the proletariat society needs to abolish the class structures that perpetuate the exploitation of the proletariat. Furthermore, Marx believes that the only way to truly abolish these class structures is to abolish the institution of private property because…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Due to the Russian people’s struggling economy while under power of a czar, the people tried a system in which society was equal. Communism prevailed, and Russia decided that communism was the way to go. Very soon, communist Russia had replaced czarist Russia. This event was formally known as the Bolshevik…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas of Marx via Lenin started to shape through the late 1910s into the mid 1920s with Russia 's authoritarian Tsar being replaced by communism through violent revolutionary struggle (English-online.at, 2016). While the Soviet Union achieved its short term aims moving towards socialism the state did not wither away, instead to maintain power it is run in an authoritarian style. The USSR is a one party state lead by dictator Joseph Stalin that protects its interests through violent measures and propaganda. In contradiction of its initial aims of giving autonomy to the citizens it is very hierarchical ,this contortion of Marxism had more in common with Hobbes Leviathan than the ideas of Lenin (Chamseddine, 2007). Towards the late 1980s…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Grigori Rasputin and the 1917 Russian Revolution One of the most significant events of Russian history was the 1917 Revolution. Predating the revolution, Russia was formed of a hierarchy society consisting of four piers; royalty, aristocracy, middle class and peasantry. After the 1917 Revolution, Russia was dismantled and transformed into the Soviet Union under the governance of the Communist Party. The Communist Party consisted of socialists with the objective to modernize their country-as well as others-into a fair, prosperous nation free of oppressive religion, inequality in regards to social stature, and a medieval governing style.…

    • 2274 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meanwhile capitalism is the complete opposite being private. According to Marx and Engels the nature of capitalism is necessarily exploitative. Marx and Engels both believed that the Proletariat, the working class, was getting stomped on by the Bourgeoisie, the middle class. Capitalism is shown as exploitative by low wages, workers having no individuality, and being alienated, and the Bourgeois private property shown for real. The co-authors try their best to show the reader that the bourgeoisie is just taking…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Private property, when referred to by communists, only refers to private ownership of industry or the means of production; the things you own personally are not private property in this sense. Marx and Lenin would just call them personal belongings. Socialist economic systems seek to end private property by making the means of production collectively owned and democratically operated by the workers; the state protects the workers’ ownership of the means of production. For Marx, the important question is not private property, because private property is not what he hopes to expropriate from the bourgeoisie. Private property and exploitation is the main cause for class division and struggle.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Private property according to Marx was the right to enjoy one's own possessions without the regard of others in a society; private property was also a man's self-interest (Marx, Karl (1994-03-15). Marx: Selected Writings (Hackett Classics) The Jewish Question, pg 16). Marx wanted to abolish private property because this meant different class systems and alienation of the working class people. Private property exploited the citizens because wealthy people can afford to buy land forcing the working class to work all day for the lowest possible income just enough to survive.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is an emotion that is typically explored by psychologists. This can be studied by sociologists too. Sociologists have developed theories that explain responses based on group dynamics. Karl Marx and C. Wright Mills both have a view on society based on the class system. Marx developed his theory based on power within the capitalist system.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays