Napoleon Bonaparte Case Study

Great Essays
Register to read the introduction… Under pressure from important nobles who were losing money, the Tzar withdrew from the Continental System. Napoleon determined to invade Russia in 1812 so as to force Russia back in. possibly due to his inflated ego in becoming the superior leader and incessant wanting of more land, he was convinced that Moscow was the heart of Russia and was determined to march there directly and take control. Napoleon was overconfident in that he allowed himself only nine weeks to defeat Russia and return to Italy and so did not provide cold weather gear for his soldiers nor frost nails for his horses. At the point of his expedition he was initially unlucky that the Russian army did not decide to fight face to face, although their initial retreat and the Russian Autumn inticed Napoleon too much, and he was lured deeper into Russia. The Russians instead implemented a scorched earth policy, destroying and burning anything worthy of supply and nourishment for Napoleon’s men, stretching the French emperor’s supply lines still further and demoralising his army. When the French and Russians finally met head on at the Battle of Borodino on 7 September, it was the largest and bloodiest single-day action of the Napoleonic Wars; it involved more than 250,000 soldiers and resulted in at least 70,000 casualties. The French captured the battlefield, but failed to destroy the Russian army. Moreover, the French could not replace their losses whereas the Russians could replace theirs. Napoleon was caught out by the Russian tactics, but could not adapt to them effectively due to his overreliance on previous tried and tested techniques, thinking he could still win the war on his standard strategy, he was badly …show more content…
The great French military leader Napoleon Bonaparte had initially capitalized on the reforms of the French Revolution to improve the lives of French citizens. However his focus on conquering Europe had eventually overridden his economic and military accomplishments. His previous successes exacerbated his ego to the point at which he became complacent with his standard tactics both on the battlefield and in the council. A sequence of poor diplomacy and belief that he could hold the European countries together by sheer force led to European countries rising in vengeance, such as the Spanish ulcer. Napoleon’s failure to deal with these threats and subsequent failing to enforce the ill fated continental system meant his empire was being dismantled piece by piece. Another reason for his downfall was his war tactic of constant Napoleonic Warfare. His main goal was to completely destroy the enemies army to the point where they no longer had the men to fight. But, this also caused heavy causualities on his side. Also, during his Invasion of Russia, he was hurt by the infamous Russian winters. When he retreated from Russia, almost all of his men got left behind (along with Michael Ney) and were completely annihilated by the enemy forces. After this, he suffered because of his army, or lack thereof. The resultant strain of fighting a multi front war against the united European forces was more failure of effective leadership than simple bad luck. Although he successfully returned from exile in the Hundred Days, his military defeat at Waterloo was the final nail in his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon’s atrophy and subsequent defeat resulted from his inability to understand the limits of his power. Miscalculations of economic warfare, mismanagement of Spain’s government and his botched attack on Russia were all deciding factors to end his sovereignty. “The downfall of the Continental System was inseparable from the fall of the Napoleonic regime.” This economic strategy was a risky gamble by Napoleon which adversely became a critical variable in his defeat.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Napoleon provided the French a monarchy that was more efficient and more powerful than any other. He did this because he believed that they needed some type of form of monarchy. When he was emperor he recreated a French “upper class.” While the emperor he continued to reward his commanders of the army with noble titles and estates.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Napoleon Case Study

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    In 1804, he implemented Code Napoleon, officially know as the civil code of 1804. This code provided for a single legal system for France, equality before the law and careers open to talent. It also granted freedom of religion, abolished serfdom and secularized the state. However, on the less liberal side of the spectrum, workers were denied collective bargaining (Negotiation between workers and their employers to determine wages, hours, rules, and working conditions.), trade unions were outlawed and a system of labor passports was instituted. His incentive for this side of the code was probably to limit political freedom.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chris In Into The Wild

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, his hubris overcame him and he died of starvation. He did not bring the proper supplies that would benefit him in the wild and he also rejected all the help he could have received from other people. Although he impacted a myriad of people such as Franz, he was foolish for not having…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon: A Political Life by Steven Englund crafts for the reader a detailed and comprehensive timeline of Napoleon Bonaparte’s origins and the events that led to rise to power through military success, political knowledge, and personal ambition. In order to accurately present this subject, Englund utilized a large amount of primary sources ranging from letters from Napoleon and others that are mentioned throughout the reading, publications from newspapers during the time, as well as many other reliable sources. Englund himself is an American Historian from California who currently lives in Paris and teaches History at the American University in Paris. It is fairly possible that this move to Paris and his occupation there served as inspiration for Napoleon: A Political Life.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though he was a brilliant speaker, he was a very poor military strategist. Through the results of many events his kingdom was falling. If only a few events had played out in his favor, who knows what would have…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eventually Napoleon then attended the military academy. While Napoleon was at the academy his father died of stomach cancer in 1785. This tragedy motivated Napoleon to become head of the family. After his father's death he went back home and sided with his father's former ally, but they later and a disagreement and Napoleon and his family moved to France. Napoleon's return to France meant his return to service with the French military.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was born the 15th of august 1769. Napoleon Bonaparte was a French military and political leader. Napoleon Bonaparte gained his power during the French revolution and he also lead many successful campaigns during the revolutionary wars. Napoleon Bonaparte was the emperor of France from 1804 to 1814 and once again in 1815. Napoleon Bonaparte was born in Corsica an island located west of the Italian peninsula.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the Russians would retreat they would burn and take all supplies that the Russians deemed wee necessary to stop the Franks from resupplying. While dangerously low on supplies and facing a tough Russian winter, a good quantity of Napoleon's troops were killed. Although Napoleon took Moscow, the defeat of over half of his existing army lead Napoleon to go Back to…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My personal opinion of the man is that it was good for Europe to have him, but also good that he was defeated ultimately. It was good that he was defeated mainly due to the issues that he had no definite successor, so how Bonapartist France would continue was kind of a mystery; and due to the fact that he would always "want more" for himself and France. Austria and Metternich in particular was not really opposed to keeping him around, as seen in the Frankfurt overtures - which would reduce France to a frontier along the Rhine and Savoy, but keep the emperor in power - but Bonaparte himself rejected this. Austria WANTED to keep Bonaparte around as a counterweight to Prussia and Russia, but alas.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In August 1915, Tsar Nicholas sent a letter to the experienced Grand Duke Nickolai Nikolaevich, “…take the supreme command of the active forces and to share with my army the fatigues of war…” He sent this to inform Grand Duke Nickolai that he will be taking over as the Supreme Commander in Chief of the Russian Army. This was a thoughtless decision as he had no experience in leading and organizing such a large-scale war. Russia herself was in no position to fight in such a big war either. An American historian described the effects of supply shortages in 1992, “Men were flung into the firing line without rifles, armed only with a sword-bayonet.”…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was an important individual that affected French and European History from 1799 to 1815. He was mainly known for his great military exploits, rapid rise to fame, and his tragic end. He was ambitious and had lots of self-confidence which helped him win the support of the people around him. He was loved by all the French people because they believed he brought back France from the pit of despair. So he was known as the leader of France.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John F. Kennedy once said "Those who make peaceful revolutions impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." During the 1700 's, Toussaint l 'Overture and Napoleon Bonaparte lead violent revolutions that propagated many changes that perpetually impacted the world. Despite the differences between them, the similarities they shared were salient; furthermore, both leaders held mass revolts and violent riots, demanded equality amongst their people, and destroyed their former government. In the same way, Louverture and Bonaparte believed that a violent approach was the most promising way to achieve their goal.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The battle of Waterloo, had extremely high casualty rates, as it is believed that there were approximately 129,000 men noted to be killed, missing or wounded, as much of 70,000 of these were believed to be followers of Napoleon (Morewood, 2015). During the battle, there were so many casualties that men were not able to walk on the ground due to walking over the bodies. The battle lasted 12 hours, during severe thunderstorm, leaving a lot of casualties. To this day it is still being debated whether or not Napoleon was indeed defeated. One of the most famous description of the battle of Waterloo, was given by The Duke of Wellington.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is actually a rather imperative topic, since his relationship with his father was ruined due to Napoleon feeling that his father betrayed the people and culture of Corsica to blend better with the French. With that in mind, it can be understood why Napoleon as a young adult would dream and plan out the ways in which he would have won Corsica independence from French rule. This idealistic mindset to free Corsica continues for an extended time period until the beginning of the French Revolution truly. With the French Revolution changing law that career advancement was no longer based on pedigree but rather intellect Napoleon’s perspective changed. The law change provided Napoleon with evidence that his ability to be viewed as an equal in French Society and not a lesser changes his perspective on France in a positive light.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays