How Far Do You Agree In The Presentation Of Hume's

Decent Essays
During the presentation by James Spence comparing what Hume believes to Adam Smith and other philosophers. This presentation was very fitting because the class has been recently talking about Hume. Throughout the presentation Spence goes into detail about Hume's opinion on resentment. Hume tends to ignore resentment due to these reasons. Many other respected philosophers connected justice with resentment, in a way consistent with Hume’s approach to moral philosophy.Hume recognizes the same connection between resentment and punish for harm. He also rejects resentment as a natural foundation for justice. These reason for this is because the sentiment of justice is either derived from our reflecting on the useful tendencies of justice or arises

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Both, Sean Kelsey’s, “The Death of Charles I,” and “The Trial and Execution of Charles I,” written by Clive Holmes are historical articles that present detailed accounts on the trial and execution of King Charles I. Although these historians compare in their attempts to evaluate the significance of the incident, their works contrast radically in terms of developing these views. Where Kelsey believes that the trial of King Charles was never intended as a pretext to execution, Holmes disagrees. This variation is expressed through the key aspects of political relationships and the temperament of the military as an institution. It is through these trends, that this paper will serve as a demonstration to how the prevailing polarization between Kelsey…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These two quotes present two opposing views about human nature. Describe the differences in the two views. How is it that the framers balanced these two opposing thoughts – or did they? To me there is not much difference between Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Edward views about human nature and Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers, Section 6, 1788.They were concerned about the dangers of disagreements between each State in America if each state had control it would not work.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MLA Annotated Bibliography: Rhetorical Analysis of “Bambara’s the Lesson” Bambara, Toni Cade. “TheLesson.” 2016. Forsyth Tech Blackboard. PDF file.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article Herbert Morris claims that the sense of guilt, which contributes much to our moral life, is gradually diminishing in both society and law. Opposing Freud 's belief that the heightening sense of guilt causes a loss in happiness, Morris claims that instead the erosion of guilt will cause consequences similar to the lost of happiness. Morris begins supporting his claim by describing how the mere nature of guilt and the sense of guilt play a significant role in law and morality. In law, the role of guilt has always been restricted and verdicts of guilt are usually limited to proceedings that are criminal or criminal in character, Legal guilt requires conscious conduct that requires culpability with respect to wrongdoing. This means…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, Berns believes anger is a moral emotion because when something unjust has happened, you should get angry about it. If you do not get angry you are not a moral being, and you do not belong in a moral community. Injustice should lead to anger, even when some people in history have taken justice into their own hands. Berns shows an example of how one human, Jack Ruby, shows that he is a moral person by killing the killer of John F. Kennedy Jr.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before deciding on a stance for the argument of whether the actions of Robin Hood are just it is important to first and foremost explain the concept of what being just pertains to. Much like the other societal suggested ways of responding to situations no absolute rule can be implemented. As time changes and perspectives evolve, the mindset of just reflects the particular expectations for what has been deemed the appropriate course of action. Utilizing a combined assimilation of the benefits and conflicts stemming from various perceptions it can be determined that his actions were driven by Robin Hood’s idea of just.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The criterion of right and wrong controversy has yet to be concluded though many years of argumentation have ensued. Mill attempts to explain the criterion of right and wrong using the concept of utilitarianism. Utility is not something that should be contrasted with pleasure, but rather pleasure itself with the freedom of pain. The criterion of right and wrongness is introduced for utility as the actions are right in proportion if they promote happiness and are wrong in proportion if they produced the reverse of happiness. Happiness is defined by pleasure and the absence of pain and unhappiness is vice versa.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The sentiment of justice, in that one of its elements which consists of desire to punish is thus, I conceive, the natural feeling of retaliation or vengeance, rendered by intellect and sympathy applicable to those injuries, that is, to those hurts,…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume was one of the most influential philosophers of his time and continues to be mentioned and studies to this day. Almost equally as impressive was the response that philosopher Immanuel Kant had to his Inquiry of Human Understanding. Kant attempted to respond to Hume’s ideas and in this essay, I will identify the Hume’s beliefs behind the concepts such as cause, and effect and I will later defend Kant’s response to Hume. He raises points that leave his reader with a deeper understanding of his concept and explicitly outlines his beliefs on the concepts that Hume covers in his Human Inquiry.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    David Hume was a well known Scottish philosopher who lived in the period of 1711-1776 and was greatly recognized for his empiricism and skepticism. He held a strong belief that the idea of knowledge is something practical, straightforward and clear, which essentially led to the formation of his famous “Copy Principle.” In his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume expands on the concepts of experience and senses as means of providing knowledge. Before analyzing the degree of validity of the “Copy Principle,” it is crucial to understand the underlying concept of the argument. Hume essentially believes that all our ideas and concepts ultimately come from experience that we have acquired throughout our lifetime.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume’s understating of justice is that the nature of human being is to be tended to his self-interest rather than acting according to just for others, which means in order to act in just it should not crush with his interests and to gain more with the common justice. He refers the progress of the rules of justice to a sense of common self-interest of occurring justice when he used the unordinary method which displays the existence of justice in social utility and the development of human being in order to understand the morality of justice. His method of skepticism influenced the awareness of morality's soul in the way that self-love, when it acts at its liberty, rather than of engaging us to honest actions, is where all injustice and violence come from. Conventions, this is what Hume refers to as the source of justice, as he mentioned in his writings that a person is for sure not bound to a promise he gave if conflicts with the interests, but at the same time if…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice is not natural because it’s existence depends on human conventions because of how necessary it is fro social life. In summary, Hume basically believes justice is a compromise and having a certain amount of respect for other people’s…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Board of Education, the ruling was merely a check against the majority to protect the rights of minorities. Majority rule is important in a democracy; yet when the majority infringes on rights of minorities, the power of the majority must be diminished in order for society to maintain justice. In Brown, it was noted that, “The plaintiffs contend that segregated public schools are not ‘equal’ and cannot be made ‘equal’ and that hence they are deprive of the equal protection of the laws” (188). It was disclosed that separate educational facilities were unequal and unjust, and thus it may hinder a child from gaining the educational rights he deserves and “to separate…generates a feeling of inferiority as their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone” (189). Segregation prevented minorities from gaining the equal rights they deserved and thus, it was important for them to achieve justice through Brown.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues that consequences of an action are all that really matter. Defining utilitarianism at its core, is a theory holding that the moral rightness and/or wrongness of an action depends entirely on the consequences of that action. Thereby agreeing that an action or decision is considered good if it generates happiness and bad if it generates the reverse. In his ethical approach, Mill suggests that the measure of success and happiness depends on how many people and how much happiness was developed as a result of that action, or the “greatest happiness principle.” This principle, Mill declares, “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays