How do you think the Constitution guards against tyranny? Do you think it was difficult to frame a government to guard against one specific problem? In the year 1787 in Philadelphia a group of men were faced with the task of writing a new Constitution for America, but this task proved to be difficult. The two main challenges they faced were that the new constitution had to override the Articles of Confederation and it had to guard against one person or group of people having too much power, which is known as tyranny. This group of men thought framing a constitution that allowed no chance of tyranny was impossible. The group of men overcame what they thought was impossible, because the Constitution now guards against tyranny by using a system of checks and balances and by having separation of powers stated within it. Checks and balances guard against tyranny by making sure none of the three branches of government have more power than another and allows the branches to have checks over one another. One of the checks the branches have over each other that is stated in the Constitution is that the president can nominate a judge to supreme …show more content…
Separation of Powers guards against tyranny by establishing the three branches of government that perform checks and balances. The three branches of government are legislative, executive, and judicial. James Madison states in the Federalist Paper #47 that these will be the branches of government for America and they will be the branches written within the constitution. The powers of each of these branches is stated in Articles one, two, and three of the constitution. The legislative branch has the responsibility of making laws, the judicial branch interprets these laws made by the legislative branch, and lastly the executive branch enforces the laws after they have been made and