How does Swift want the reader to view his speaker? That is, how would Swift want his reader to describe the persona he adopts? From a broad perspective, Swift strives to depict his speaker as a conspicuously erudite individual, who, in turn, possesses noteworthy intellectual capacities. In further elaboration upon this reality, throughout the course of the essay, the speaker assesses contrasting viewpoints and renders sufficient explanations, as to why posed alternatives would fail to suffice. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when Swift states, “As to my own part, having turned my thoughts for many years upon this important subject, and maturely weighed the several schemes of other projectors, I have always
…show more content…
Venturing deeper into the specifics, the speaker underscores the insatiable demand for food resources and its corresponding relationship to a mass annihilation of young individuals: a conspicuous exemplification of satire. While initially insinuating the development of a legitimate, efficacious solution to a society’s quandary, the author ultimately derides a government for failing to respond to famine-oriented conditions. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the author states, “That the remaining hundred thousand may at a year old be offered in sale to the persons of quality and fortune through the kingdom, always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump and fat for a good table” (Swift 6). The quote above sheds light upon the argument that essentially leads one to adopt a satiric interpretation of Swift’s proposal. To add to this, the nearly instinctual disdain towards such a suggestion is namely designed to prompt antipathy towards an incompetent governing framework. However, it is integral to note that a modern audience is likely to obtain a grasp of the posed notion at a markedly slower pace, compared to its counterparts: a surmise that captures the essence of modern society’s unfamiliarity with the relevant topic-of-interest. While …show more content…
Venturing deeper into the specifics, through the extensive elaboration upon the dividends that are paid, thanks to his so-called “panacea”, the author essentially primes the audience to embrace his arguments in a passionate fashion. Evidence from the text that further supports this claim is shown when the author states, “There is likewise another great advantage in my scheme, that it will prevent those voluntary abortions, and that horrid practice of women murdering their bastard children, alas, too frequent among us…” (Swift 4). The quote above sheds light upon how Swift tactfully prompts the acceptance of his arguments by strategically preceding the momentous suggestion with a large array of its benefits: a reality that significantly reduces the likelihood of eliciting resentment among the readers. To add to this, such a stylistic device hampers the audience’s ability of discerning the sheer degree of inhumanity that complements the proposed notion of ingesting young children. In brief, the rhetorical purpose of such a strategy is to mask the glaringly obvious flaws of the central idea, while additionally harboring support for the overall
Venturing deeper into the specifics, the speaker underscores the insatiable demand for food resources and its corresponding relationship to a mass annihilation of young individuals: a conspicuous exemplification of satire. While initially insinuating the development of a legitimate, efficacious solution to a society’s quandary, the author ultimately derides a government for failing to respond to famine-oriented conditions. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the author states, “That the remaining hundred thousand may at a year old be offered in sale to the persons of quality and fortune through the kingdom, always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump and fat for a good table” (Swift 6). The quote above sheds light upon the argument that essentially leads one to adopt a satiric interpretation of Swift’s proposal. To add to this, the nearly instinctual disdain towards such a suggestion is namely designed to prompt antipathy towards an incompetent governing framework. However, it is integral to note that a modern audience is likely to obtain a grasp of the posed notion at a markedly slower pace, compared to its counterparts: a surmise that captures the essence of modern society’s unfamiliarity with the relevant topic-of-interest. While …show more content…
Venturing deeper into the specifics, through the extensive elaboration upon the dividends that are paid, thanks to his so-called “panacea”, the author essentially primes the audience to embrace his arguments in a passionate fashion. Evidence from the text that further supports this claim is shown when the author states, “There is likewise another great advantage in my scheme, that it will prevent those voluntary abortions, and that horrid practice of women murdering their bastard children, alas, too frequent among us…” (Swift 4). The quote above sheds light upon how Swift tactfully prompts the acceptance of his arguments by strategically preceding the momentous suggestion with a large array of its benefits: a reality that significantly reduces the likelihood of eliciting resentment among the readers. To add to this, such a stylistic device hampers the audience’s ability of discerning the sheer degree of inhumanity that complements the proposed notion of ingesting young children. In brief, the rhetorical purpose of such a strategy is to mask the glaringly obvious flaws of the central idea, while additionally harboring support for the overall