How Does Machiavelli Influence Government

Improved Essays
Machiavelli was an Italian political scientist. Many believe his teaching were that of evil and greed. As the political theorist that he was, He stressed the importance of brute, and even in some cases malicious force to keep the order of society, Anyone who defected from the prince's orders did not make it very far without some form of punishment following close by.
To further back this claim, this paper will look into the evidence written by the man himself and others who cross examined his work. In conclusion this document will show how Machiavelli influenced government with his writings of how to seize and control power. “The end justifies the means.” (The Prince, Chapter XVIII). This quote from the Italian Diplomat himself shows us just

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This distrust, however, is vital to Machiavelli’s end goal. He demonstrates the effectiveness of this method by providing the historical example of Scipio of Spain, “... whose armies rebelled against him in Spain, which arose from nothing but his excessive kindness, which allowed more license to the soldiers than was consonant with military discipline” (70). By drawing from this historical example, he proves that it is ultimately much more beneficial for the entire nation for a leader to have some distrust in their citizens. Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli creates many different rules for a leader to follow, but…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Cesare’s rule predates The Prince, he encompasses all of Machiavelli’s political philosophies presented in Machiavelli’s writing. His rule was not perfect however, Cesare did have a fatal flaw which prevented him from becoming the leader he aspired to be. Cesare had become an impressive leader not on his own, but by inheriting his power to rule from his father Pope Alexander VI. Machiavelli describes Cesare’s attempt at leading an attack on foreign lands “...he wanted to maintain it and proceed farther ahead, two things impeded him. One was his own army, which to him did not seem faithful”(60) explaining that Cesare was held back by his reliance on borrowed troops.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, the manner in which Machiavelli’s theory originated from was his study of history, allowing him to draw conclusions about what is inherent in human nature through past human acts. Humans, to a certain extent, are self-interested, although they can be easily won or lost. In times of trouble, man turns egotistical and look for a leg up within adversity; in times of prosperity, they are trustworthy and loyal to their ruler. Posing a famous political dilemma, Machiavelli asks whether “it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse” (Chapter XVII). Because he believes man becomes disloyal to the state when times are tough, and the ultimate purpose of the Prince is to maintain order within the state, Machiavelli argues a ruler should be feared.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli argued that the ruler or the politicians could achieve national goals with various ways, which include both angle and evil deed. “ Therefore, a prince must not worry about the infamy of being considered cruel when it is a matter of keeping his subjects united and loyal” ,“A prince, and especially a new prince, cannot observe all those things for which men are considered good, because in order to maintain the state he must often act against his faith, against charity, against humanity, and against religion”Form these two sentence, we can clearly understand that the public virtue of Machiavelli can be realized by the evil deed. The division of two kinds of virtue doesn’t mean that Machiavelli deny the importance of private virtue. In his opinion, private virtue should play an important role within a range, like transforming man ' s ideology and cultivate good personality.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Prince, by Niccolo Machiavelli, is a political treatise/non-fiction book written as a guide for how to be an effective ruler. Machiavelli intends to guide rulers on how to seize a country and how to destroy an enemy. He writes about rulers of his time and the things they did well and did not do so well. His purpose was to right a book to advise the aristocracy in what they should do to rule effectively so government would be run in the way his mind pictured it. He told the world the truth about how politics really were, and did not soften it up one bit.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fundamental objective of international law, to regulate the relations between sovereign states, has become a standard to evaluating the effectiveness of different approaches to international law. Various philosophical disciplines have interpreted the importance and usefulness of international law in order to establish a better understanding of how international law is to be executed. This paper will take a thorough look at how two different philosophers have explained the concepts and principles that make up international law. Specifically, analyzing how Niccolò Machiavelli and Hugo Grotius present contrasting ideas of the original principles of international law and propose different ways through which international law should be justly…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy regarding government is very interesting. His statement that the good prince is not necessarily a good man and that evil acts are sometimes necessary for the good of the state is not one that I agree with or am comfortable with. In my opinion, the good of the state depends on its relationships with other nations and the health and happiness of the people. If a government is willing to assassinate dictators, use methods of mass destruction, and/or take away rights from citizens, there will undoubtedly be a revolt or rebellion that would result in the loss of power for the government, so Machiavelli's idea is flawed. Not to mention, if a government uses means of destruction against another…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau Vs Machiavelli

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “From this arises the question: whether it is better to be loved or hated. One would like to be both but it is difficult to combine them, so it is far better to be feared than loved… for love is secured by a bond of gratitude which men break when it is advantageous , but fear is secured by dread of punishment which is always effective” (pg. 10). He was not concerned with public opinion or morality so long as the preservation of the state was the goal. In many ways Machiavelli pioneered a new form of leadership that indeed aided in the expansion of many European nations, but over time this overzealous, immoral leadership would prove to be the very downfall of well-established…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli theory argues that a ruler must do whatever it takes to gain and hold political power, but in the eyes of his subjects have the appearance of being morally…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) was an Italian logician and writer who both shocked and intrigued the mind of Renaissance Europe. In his most renowned work, Il Principe (The Prince)(1532), he set out his thoughts on how the ruler of a nation could set out to achieve power and how he may keep that power once he had secured it. In spite of the fact that Shakespeare's most notorious Cunning character is Richard III, the model of the political rogue out to secure his own particular position can be recognized most plainly in the characters of Iago (Othello), Edmund (Lord Lear), and Claudius (Villa), and to a lesser degree in the characters of Village himself and Augustus Caesar in Antony and Cleopatra. In the repercussions of the production of…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up in such a tumultuous era allowed Niccolò Machiavelli to examine many cases of the rise and subsequent fall of short-lived governments as well as their causes, such as constantly changing alliances. These experiences led to a cynical view of human nature along with a clear understanding of the objectionable behavior necessary to retain power in politics. His career as a politician and diplomat cemented his very pragmatic stance on human nature and the nature of politics, both of which are described throughout The Prince. Unlike fellow philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, who preferred to hypothesize based on ideals, Machiavelli held the contentious belief that a separation between politics and moral philosophy was the necessary…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, it provides a kind of protection against the “wretched” men and world that he believes we live in; morality in an amoral world, however ideal or preferable, is far less effective than adapting and being amoral yourself. His claim that being amoral and ruthless are far more effective means of grasping and maintaining power, therefore ensuring stability and effective rule which benefits the people, is not unfounded. It is too idealistic to claim that Machiavelli’s amoralism makes his arguments defective; especially within the context of 16th century Florentine politics, his assertion that one must be ruthless and “play the game” of politics hold steady…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays