How Does Justice Kennedy Interpret The Constitution

Improved Essays
Justice Kennedy is open to interpret the Constitution. Kennedy's base of political involvement begun with his father. As a Republican, his father influenced his conservative ideology to be dominant. However, Kennedy is also shaped by an evolving enlighten society. He is thoughtful towards the public than exercising his own personal ideas and fitting in into a particular ideology. things in a more modern sense and steer clear from being an originalist. He believes that things are specified but there was room for the constitution to be interpreted differently since some things are ambiguous but if it is printed and clear then that's how the law should be created. he must define and enforce the meaning of liberty. it is not comprehended by the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court Case of Reed v. Reed, 1971, The Extent of Equal Rights, two parents sought the ownership of their deceased sons estate. Richard Lynn Reed was still a minot when he passed without a will addressing which of his possessions would go to whom, both of his parents, Cecil and Sally Reed, made advances to claim their adoptive sons land. Both Cecil and Sally filed applications to become the administrator of the estate to the Idaho court, who then held a joint hearing for them. The court came to the conclusion that the Richards father, Cecil, would be granted administrator because the Idaho law dictated that “if several persons who are equally entitled to administer an estate file a petition, ‘males must be preferred to females. ’”(Supreme…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The McCulloch v Maryland case, presided over by John Marshall, dealt with the legality of the State of Maryland’s decision to place taxes on bank notes chartered from outside of the area. The issue was brought to the national level after James McCulloch, leader of the Second National Bank of the United States within Baltimore, refused to pay the imposed fee. The Supreme Court ultimately sided in his favor, citing the fact that the state had ratified the Constitution and then, the Necessary and Proper Clause. Likewise, Congress possesses powers that are not specifically defined within the supreme law of the land, therefore it is up to the discretion of the Judicial Branch to decide whether or not the intent is reasonable. In this case, they…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Litwack Vs Michener

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Michener, Marshall, and Litwack have different views about the constitution. There opinions vary about the constitution and what it meant to them. James Michener thought of the constitution as a masterpiece of writing. According to Michener the constitution was written so well that even philosophers are amazed by what it has achieved. Michener thought of the government as a well oiled machine that works very well in unison.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A hot debate relevant for today is the question of how the constitution is to be interpreted. When writing the constitution, the founding fathers were clearly living in an ern which entailed concerns that are different from concerns today. During the constitutional convention, men discussed debated until they agree on what should become the framework for our great nation. Because of this the constitution appears to be ambiguous on many particular issues which we face today. Are we then to address those issues in light of the context in which the constitution was written, or are we to view it as a living document that’s meaning changes with time?…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proper Interpretation (Meese) The interpretation of the Constitution has been a controversial issue between people in the government. In A Jurisprudence of Original Intention by Edwin Meese III, Meese provides an article with the intention of telling his audience the importance of interpreting the Constitution properly. Meese highlights the idea that all courts in the United States have to base their decisions strictly from the Constitution. It is evident that Meese wants a strict interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Jefferson, one of the most popular founding fathers, the main author of the Declaration of Independence, and the third president of the United States of America was revered by his contemporaries and is still to this day a well respected figure in American history. But, this does not mean that the man had no faults. Often in todays world Thomas Jefferson is looked back upon and has been scrutinized by many for his apparent hypocrisy on matters such as slavery and on what he believed limitations of the federal government were to be. Although some of Jefferson’s past can be dark and questionable, he was no hypocrite, but a man who understood that his decisions would have lasting effects on the new country, and that putting his own personal…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    District of Columbia v. Heller The Second Amendment is one of the most controversial amendments in the Constitution. There have been several cases where the Amendment has been challenged. As the world keeps growing and developing, the amendments have stayed the same since the creation in 1789. Therefore, as the years go by the original meaning of the text is getting lost in translation, which has caused the Supreme Court Justices to try to interpret the meaning the best way they can to ensure a fair trial.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A believer in John Locke’s theories of natural rights, Jefferson…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In examining the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment one has to look at the Bill of Right which it has been used to incorporate. The original Constitution was devoid of a Bill of Right guaranteeing citizens’ rights. The exclusion of the Bill of Right almost derailed the ratification of the Constitution as it was deemed essential. James Madison drafted 7 out of 10 of the Bill of Rights. Madison proposed language that would have made the Bill of Rights binding on the states; that verbiage did not make it into the final amendments.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is it fair for a Supreme Court Justice to follow public opinion instead of seeing the case through the law? Originally Africans were captured and taken to the United States by the Dutch in 1619. During the next couple of decades, more Africans and Caucasians were brought as apprentices and indentured servants to become free after their time was served. As time passed the Africans were no longer indentured servants, but rather moved down the socioeconomic scale around the 1650’s. They remained as slaves while, their white counterparts became free.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Federalist Alexander Hamilton regarded the Constitution as the fundamental law, which is superior to any state statute, and as a limited Constitution. In Federalist Paper Number 78, Hamilton argues that the Supreme Court should have the authority to invalidate acts of Congress that are deemed unconstitutional, and that if there is a variance between the Constitution and a law passed by Congress, federal courts have the responsibility to follow the Constitution. Paper Number 78, having been cited in thirty-seven Supreme Court opinions as of April 2007, has had an immense influence on the debate regarding the interpretation and application of the Constitution (Coenen). Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is an advocate of textualism, arguing that the meaning of the Constitution lies in the words of the document, and that the Constitution should be regarded in favor of its “original meaning”. Justice Stephen…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The framers of the Constitution were visionaries who sought to establish a limited representative government which not only restricted the powers of an existing government, but also safeguarded the rights of the minority through restricting majority rule. A republic, they believed, would be the only form of government in which the liberty of the people could be preserved. Greatly influenced by the 17th century British philosopher John Locke, who advocated for the protection of natural rights of man by entering into a social contract, separation of governmental powers, and individuals’ right to consent to being governed, the founding fathers were able to incorporate such teachings into the Constitution of the United States. The American founders…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the period of 1801 through 1817, the conflict of the Democratic-Republican views on the constitution were arguing against the ideas of the Federalists. The two parties believed in completely different ideas of how to interpret the constitution. Although the parties knew they must come to some agreement in how the constitution should be interpreted they both had some very good reasons there party was correct. The Democratic-Republicans believed in interpreting the constitution exactly.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom in all types of forms Both Roosevelt's “Four Freedoms” speech and Kennedy's inaugural address how America should be safe and how to redeem freedom, however Roosevelt's speech was about the want and need for freedom whereas Kennedy's speech is about keeping peace to earn freedom. In Kennedy's inaugural address he says many times that peace is not given to anyone for free and that you need to earn it in order to keep it, as seen in paragraphs 12, 14, and 19. Kennedy tells us in those paragraphs that we will make a difference in the world and will make things better.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays