How Does Foucault View Justice Socially Constructed

Improved Essays
Chomsky believes justice can be disassociated from power. He believes that human being has the capacity to use logic and make judgments rationally that can guide us to a more neutral society free from biased. Foucault believes that justice is socially constructed by those with power especially the government and private institutions.
Foucault believes that our society is constructed to benefit the people in power while it denies the rest of the classes. Foucault’s viewpoint of justice was influenced by Marxist theory. In Foucault’s opinion our justice system is made up of “bourgeois” (property owners), and it is a system of repression. According to Marxist theory, capitalism creates a system of inequality and it prevents the lower class from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If men are equal, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims in the preface to his discourse on inequality (40), why do some men live in large lavish houses, while others struggle on the street, unsure of their next meal? The distance between the rich and the poor has been increasing steadily over the last decade, but in reality it has been expanding ever since man separated from Rousseau’s original state of nature. The state of nature is different than that which is natural, and within Rousseau’s state of nature, physical inequality is the only thing separating a man from another. Therefore, disregarding physical inequality, nature for man was equal and the state of nature provided an equal playing ground. As early as the preface, Rousseau realizes that in order for one to understand inequality, one must first attempt to understand man (39).…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The great social theorist and philosopher, Isaiah Berlin once stated, “Injustice, poverty, slavery, ignorance - these may be cured by reform or revolution. But men do not live only by fighting evils. They live by positive goals, individual and collective, a vast variety of them, seldom predictable, at times incompatible.” In simpler terms, Berlin is saying that to cure injustice and poverty, men may use revolution and reform but they cannot “live only by fighting evils”, they must also live by positive goals that protect society’s interests as a whole and not become guided by their own ignorance. And it is for these reasons that Maximilien Robespierre’s Reign of Terror was not justified.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1750, Rousseau created his first major work that would be further developed in the future: Discours les Sciences et les Arts -- better known as the First Discourse. In the First Discourse, Rousseau’s thesis stated “that social development, including of the arts and sciences, is corrosive of both civic virtue and individual moral character” (Stanford Encyclopedia). Rousseau discusses how society has been corrupted by modern morals, leading to individuals following conformism. According to Ty Landrum, a practitioner who has completed his doctoral degree at the University of Virginia, says “Rousseau's philosophy of education focuses upon rearing the dangerous desire for recognition that he calls "amour-propre"” (Landrum). Rousseau believes…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a multitude of opinions on the tyranny of the majority. People all over constantly discussing the future of the United States and its government. Even more so, than back when North America was beginning. Many people had lots of opinions. Tocqueville, was a philosopher that was highly educated on this and even wrote about it.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Revolutions are seen by many as an inevitable part of many societies. They allow both the people and societies to progress and advance. One of these revolutions was the French Revolution, which led to the downfall of monarchies in other parts of Europe. The French Revolution began in 1789 and ended in the late 1790s. The revolution began with people wanting small reforms, such as changes to the system of taxation; leading to a complete change, transforming every aspect of French citizen’s lives, including for a short time, calendars and clocks.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is the main focus for Marxists, however they have been criticized for being too focused on class and not looking at other factors of inequality such as…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Second Discourse on Inequality, Jean Jacque Rousseau outlined the origin and development of private property. The formation of the hut is the first step towards the ultimate creation of society as families and communities start to form. Unlike savage man who’s primary motivation was self-preservation, civilized man embraced amour propre as they begin to compare their strengths and abilities of others. Although Rousseau argues that the invention of private property is not natural, it is inevitable as it becomes a necessity due to certain circumstances such as metallurgy and agriculture. Furthermore, the inequalities of property established a division between the wealthy versus the poor and played a significant role in the creation of…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This theory can be applied to nearly every point in history and to every culture. Through a Marxist lens everything can be explained including the discrimination between classes of all types of people. The novel Of Mice and Men shows multiple examples of this theory throughout the story. The novel works with two men that are trying to make their way in the world. Along the way they meet a lot of people that are restricted…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism requires “Centralization of credits in the hands of the state” (387). In other words, Karl Marx believes in the establishment of an equal class in that wealth is shared and balanced among all citizens; essentially diminishing class itself. Condorcet does not stretch that far in discussing equality; he believes each person should work for their own money (193). In addition, Antoine Nicolas de Condorcet believes everyone should start with a clean slate, meaning that there is equal opportunity for each individual to define their own status. Also, due to complete communism, Marxism believes “Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another” (388).…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One is fighting for freedom for a specified group of people in terms of public freedom (MLK) and the other is telling society that we are free if we are able to have a choice (Sartre). Sartre was also an existentialist, and Martin Luther King was not. Their differences are actually not bad. With all the racism that is going on in todays I believe that both theories are useful. I believe they both would apply in today’s society because people have a right to their public freedom and people owe it to themselves to understand that they can be in control of that with choice and not just by merely existing but taking action like the riots and peace walks to raise an awareness that their indeed is an issue.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first preamble of the manifesto; ‘Bourgeois and Proletarians’, the authors explain the capitalist mode of production that is associated with conflicts between classes. The Bourgeois exploit and oppress the proletariat through competition and private ownership of property, including land. However, the capitalist mode of production becomes incompatible with the exploitative and oppressive relationship, contributing to the proletariat leading a revolution. On the contrary, the revolution will be different from the previous class relationships in that the new ruling class will not be driven towards reallocation of property.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Discipline and Punish, Michel Foucault breaks down the premises of a panoptic system, outlining the mechanics through which it controls a population and linking it to other structures seen throughout a society, such as in prisons and schools. An example of such evident in the implementation of new grading rubrics for English teachers across America in 1923. The essays of 12th graders nationwide, who wrote under the same conditions, formed the base of a design for a national rubric, consisting of a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 was the highest possible score. The analysis of differently graded essays reveals the series of values that the system promoted. The national grading system primarily encourages the use of Standard Written English, then…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Within the books of John Berger and Michel Foucault’s thoughts and ideas, they’re shown throughout their short anthologies. In “Ways of Seeing” and Panopticism; we see a lot of similarities and differences between the authors. From the way they write, to the way they express, to the way they think about their emotions and how they translate it out to their readers. John Berger talks about how we have our own perspectives on seeing things and how we can maintain different views in our society. Michel Foucault talks about how individuals are seen in the society and how others have the power to control them.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The teachings of Karl Marx and Marxism has always been my favorite theoretical perspective because it has been misunderstood over time. One of the best things about Marxism is that it stressed the importance of social equality and the issues that the system of capitalism created in society. Marx argued that capitalism was hindrance to freedom because only those who have money can really enjoy freedom. The Marxist theory in the simplest perspective is that “Marxism emphasizes the idea that social life is based upon "conflicts of interest".…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays