How Does Drehle Use Capital Punishment?

Improved Essays
“…the modern death penalty remains slow, costly and uncertain,” quoted from the article the Death of the Death Penalty, written by David Von Drehle. In this article, Drehle highlights the various factors that truly exemplifies the death penalty. With provided quotes and graphs to emphasize and visualize Drehle’s standpoint of the death penalty. As well as, a five proclaimed reasons that Drehle studied and wrote about, “the end of this troubled system is creeping into view.”
Subsequently, as quoted from the article, “…prosecutors, judges, and jurors are concluding that the modern death penalty is a failed experiment.” And it is due to the costly amount, “the reality is that capital punishment is nothing more than an expensive, wasteful and risky government program.” I can agree with this statement because it is true, it is taking our money and over working it. Hence, as mentioned, the five reasons to why the death penalty is hitting a wall, as I learned, we are not getting better at it because of the denying of pharmaceutical companies supplying out killing. Crime rate is declining as oppose to the beginning, as quoted from the article, “a new crime wave was building, and states rushed to restore capital punishment by passing laws meant to eliminate arbitrary results and racial discrimination.
…show more content…
Likewise, as mentioned in the article, “the facts are irrefutable, and the logic is clear,” to say that the death penalty, opinioned by Drehle, “a form of punishment for those who commit capital murder, and I now believe…should be abolished.” I forward his

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The implementation of the death penalty is a tricky and controversial subject. When writing for the New Republic in 1985, Edward I. Koch and David Bruck shared their judgement on capital punishment. They addressed the topic from two opposing viewpoints and challenged the death penalty’s effectiveness and place in American society today. Edward I. Koch served as mayor of the state of New York for eleven years and was involved in public service for a total of twenty years. In his essay titled, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” Koch was adamant that the death penalty affirmed the highest value for human life by being the highest penalty (Koch 486).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article "Capital punishment’s slow death," George F. Will claims capital punishment is unjust. The death penalty is becoming used less over time, but Americans are still divided over whether it should be abolished or not. The movement created about capital punishment has split into liberals being against it and conservatives for it. This article is able to give insight into both sides, as George Will is a conservative who is against the death penalty.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the severity of the death penalty will make criminals want to avoid it. However, the statistics tell a different story. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the rates of murder, one of the most common violent crimes in the U.S., are higher in states using capital punishment than the ones that aren’t (Deterrence). While the general trend of murder rates has been a downwards one, there’s still a significant percentage difference in the statistics (peak difference was 46% in 2005). This evidence shows that the idea that capital punishment is a deterrent is false.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Death of the Death Penalty”, David Von Drehle states that the death penalty is becoming less common and should now just be abolished because of the cost and time that it takes. Drehles article was published in Time Magazine. He concludes that the death penalty has become unnecessary and doesn’t work anymore. The crime rate in the United States has declined so much that in the past decade even though there are hundreds of people under the death penalty. This statement is making people believe that there is no reason to keep the death penalty in our society.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The discussion organized into six different issues; deterrence, incapacitation, caprice and bias, cost, innocence, and retribution, portrays thoughts and research that has both opposed and supported capital punishment in the last twenty-five years. In turn, the three-major observations that were derived from this discussion include first, significant changes death penalty debates throughout the years, second, an accelerated worldwide decline in the acceptance of capital punishment, and lastly, sending a positive message of encouragement to criminologists who feel their research doesn’t do much to persuade both public and policy makers (Radelet & Borg, 2000). Just how this review suggests, I believe that as individuals become more informed about the current research done on the effects of capital punishment we will see a major decline on pro capital punishment social norms on a worldwide…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having individuals that can testify against the false avocation that the death penalty is used to punish those truly guilty for their crimes because it displays the extreme used in the wrong instance through its ruling on the innocent. Capital punishment’s inefficiency shines through the innocents’ conviction because how is providing the wrongful ruling suppose to deter future crime it only works to diminish the public’s trust in the judicial system and the validness of the death penalty ruling. Along with innocent men speaking out against capital punishment, comes the costly and time-consuming misconception that the act of evolving the death penalty has made it more humane even though despite popular belief “the death penalty has not become more civilized with the passage of time” (Stroud III, 381). We an human beings can’t continue to turn a blind eye towards the fact that no matter how the executors of the death penalty make it look it is still the blatant taking of another’s life whether it be with a rope, a chair or lethal doses of drugs. Another reason that both Stroud and myself see as being worth ending the option of capital punishment judicial decision is the appalling conditions that create “an environment conducive to depression and hopelessness” for its inmates (Stroud, 383).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Death Penalty: Inhumane or Necessary Deterrent?” written by Euan McKirdy, several concepts surrounding the death penalty are discussed. McKirdy is a Digital News Producer who joined CNN in early 2014 and covers everything from politics, tech and the environment to sport and the arts. Before McKirdy started writing for CNN he wrote for a different publications and websites including Time, the BBC, the Wall Street Journal and Monocle. Throughout the article, McKirdy displays information for both sides of the controversial argument. He writes: Advocates say it is a powerful deterrent against serious crime, while others point to the problems -- and cost -- of keeping violent offenders in general prison populations.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The key features of the argument on supporting the death penalty developed by Ernest Van Den Haag first focuses on matters of mal-distribution and determining if an individual really deserves it, second the miscarriages of justice, third if the death penalty is a better deterrence than other punishments, fourth the incidental issues that the death penalty promotes, and fifth justice, excess, and degradation. The first argument that Ernest Van Den Haag argues is on the matter of mal-distribution, and determining whether an individual really deserves capital punishment. He expresses his view that mal-distribution being compared between those individuals who are guilty or innocent is undeserved. The acts of capital punishment upon an individual who knowingly commits a crime and is considered guilty in that sense deserves the punishment. However, on the other hand he considers that when mal-distribution is then put upon an innocent life that did not commit the crime but is considered guilty is seen as than unjust.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the book provides the general public with how the death penalty was originated. The authors asserts the reader about how controversial the topic is by providing a timeline from the very first day capital punishment was implemented. The source is useful because it indicates more information about how effective the death penalty is, for Henderson and Flander provides his prop death penalty point of view effectively. The use of Henderson’s and Flander’s source helps further educate readers of why the subject is so problematic in the eyes of politicians today and gives readers examples of death penalty cases as…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER Facts about the Death Penalty (2017, April 7) Retrieved from (https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/FactSheet.pdf) In the article, Facts about the Death Penalty, further proves why the death penalty is the ultimate, irreversible removal of human rights, that come at an extreme cost. We, as people, should be held accountable for our actions. Ultimately, by having the death penalty available, we decided the fate of some of America’s most horrendous criminals.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Death Penalty: The Price Society Pays The death penalty has been a topic of controversy for centuries, known for its inhumane brutality methods which have evolved over the years from lynching to gassing, electrocuting and now the lethal injection; it is in fact the sentencing of those who have committed a heinous crime. On the other hand, justice has been served when the death penalty has finally been executed on the prisoner, bringing a sense of retribution to those who have lost a loved one due to the crime committed. Although many people might think it is a working system, others land in the mixture of controversy for various reasons. Over the course of time, the death penalty has started to become obsolete and is slowly making a turnover…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the late affirmation of demoralization is finally had all the earmarks of being correct, then opponents of capital punishment will go up against an overwhelming undertaking on great grounds. In case each execution saves various immaculate lives, the harms of capital punishment would should be especially mind boggling to legitimize its repeal, significantly more paramount than most observers have up to this time charged. I do not think I will ever agree with the death penalty. I believe that instead of killing them, let them suffer by being in jail for the rest of their lives. There is continually remaining defenselessness in human science and honest to goodness approach, and here the careful level headed discussion continues with; we have tried to delineate, rather than to monitor, the late…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays