Brutus’s reason is obvious and well said, leaving no mystery and also leaving no question as to whether Caesar deserved death. Another strength in Brutus’s speech are his appeals to ethos. He establishes himself as an honorable man who therefore must have something good and just to say. However, these merits fall to the flaws in his speech along with Antony’s superior appeals to pathos. Brutus’s main flaws are that he doesn’t effectively connect on a personal level with his audience but rather pushes them away. He accuses “who is here so base that would be a bondman? …. Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman?”(III, ii, 18-20). These questions work against Brutus simply because no one wants to feel called out like Brutus is doing, thus alienating the crowd. The second part of Brutus’s speeches downfall is Antony’s success. Antony is first successful in decimating Brutus’s appeals to ethos by
Brutus’s reason is obvious and well said, leaving no mystery and also leaving no question as to whether Caesar deserved death. Another strength in Brutus’s speech are his appeals to ethos. He establishes himself as an honorable man who therefore must have something good and just to say. However, these merits fall to the flaws in his speech along with Antony’s superior appeals to pathos. Brutus’s main flaws are that he doesn’t effectively connect on a personal level with his audience but rather pushes them away. He accuses “who is here so base that would be a bondman? …. Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman?”(III, ii, 18-20). These questions work against Brutus simply because no one wants to feel called out like Brutus is doing, thus alienating the crowd. The second part of Brutus’s speeches downfall is Antony’s success. Antony is first successful in decimating Brutus’s appeals to ethos by