Hrabowski acknowledges, “Both sides have points. However the first argument treats colleges as monolithic, and the second turns individual students into averages” (690). This is most certain credible, some colleges make no changes within students. On the other hand, the other side argues that colleges can prepare students to be an ordinary college graduate. For instance, two friend may attend the same college with same expectation which is wanting to be successful. One friend might graduate from college as a changed person with goals and ambitions, and the second friend might remain the same with no change in his or her life. He says, “Too often, our system fails to help students identify the institutions best suited for them” (Hrabowski 690). Hrabowski feels if students had any assistance finding an institution in their favor, college will prepare them for life. The author most definitely relates this statement to ethos by taken both side into consideration and seeing the argument from different
Hrabowski acknowledges, “Both sides have points. However the first argument treats colleges as monolithic, and the second turns individual students into averages” (690). This is most certain credible, some colleges make no changes within students. On the other hand, the other side argues that colleges can prepare students to be an ordinary college graduate. For instance, two friend may attend the same college with same expectation which is wanting to be successful. One friend might graduate from college as a changed person with goals and ambitions, and the second friend might remain the same with no change in his or her life. He says, “Too often, our system fails to help students identify the institutions best suited for them” (Hrabowski 690). Hrabowski feels if students had any assistance finding an institution in their favor, college will prepare them for life. The author most definitely relates this statement to ethos by taken both side into consideration and seeing the argument from different