How Did The Plantation Crops Affect The Economy

Good Essays
Plantation crops and the Southern Economy The South’s economy wasn't as strong as some people would have thought. Even with the money that the South made from their cash crops, there were 3 reasons why the economy was weak (Economy of the South 36). First, southern farmers mainly relied on tobacco, cotton, and sugar. These were also known as cash crops (Economy of the South 36). Second, since farmers didn’t pay slaves for their labor, their profits turn out to be falsely high (Economy of the South 36). Finally, because farmers were making so much money from growing cotton, they did not see the need to have manufacturing and industry. (Economy of the South 36). The two major cash crops, cotton and sugar, had an affect on the Civil War and the South’s economy. …show more content…
The cotton gin was a tool that sped the process of collecting cotton. The gin separated the cotton fibers from the seed (Cotton 65). Since the invention was made, it allowed a person to collect up to 50 gallons of cleaned cotton (Cotton 65). Since production rose greatly from growing cotton, the number of slaves increased significantly (Cotton 65). Farmers saw that growing cotton was such a good opportunity that they wanted all of their slaves to work on the cotton fields instead of the other plantation fields (Economy of the South 37). This created huge tensions between the North and South (Cotton 66). Since the North deeply disapproved of slavery, they were not happy to hear about the rise in slavery in the South (Cotton 66). Later on, cotton farming expanded in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas. (Economy of the South 36). Besides cotton, farmers also grew an important cash crop which was known to be

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Being rural, most of the Southerners lived in large allotted lands with slaves or being yeomen farmers, which also hurt the rate of industrialization. This means that unlike the North, there capital wasn’t busy and causing trade, and industrialization in a way hurt the Southerners as they aren’t advancing in technology, because they though with all this plantations and cash crops, why would they need to industrialize? This was a major difference between the North and the South, which could have caused the civil war, primarily because how they have to rely on slaves to fuel their massive plantations. There were more wealthy people in the North then the…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The southerners were experiencing dramatically different developments than the northerners between the 1830s and 1860s. The crop of choice in the south became the cotton, and it was quickly labeled the king. Cotton contributed to half of the exports in the nation, and the Southern farmers knew that they would get rich if they continue to farm the cotton. Southerners brought slaves and slavery with them into the southwestern territories of the United States because for the farmer to grow cotton required slaves and land. The southerners did not care for the big cities, and they did not have jobs to offer which made it hard attract the immigrants the way the northerners do.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Effects Of King Cotton

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rebuilding the economy proved to be a difficult task during the Reconstruction Era, since the South had previously relied on only one type of economic activity. Southerners were resentful towards the Yankee middlemen, bankers, agents, and shippers who reaped the benefits of cotton production. They realized that, despite the plantation system, the equipment they used was manufactured in the North, where they also sent the cotton fibers to be made into…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Every critical event leading up to the Civil War, at its heart, has slavery as the main component. As stated in the textbook “the intensive labor required to produce cotton, rice and sugar made slavery an inseparable part of life in the southern way of life.” Many Northerners saw slavery as inhumane and evil treatment of humans. Therefore, I feel without the extremely high demand for cotton throughout the nation and internationally, for textile…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many historians agree that Southern deficiencies in commerce, finance and transport ultimately led to the Southern defeat and the emancipation of slaves, as it was not a war between two equal parties. In the South, there was a shortage of factories which could be used to make guns and weaponry and they lacked methods to transport any goods over long distances. In contrast, the North benefited from an industrial revolution in the first decades of the nineteenth century and therefore had access to the extensive rail network and factories. The North were therefore dependent on labourers as opposed to slaves, whereas in the South, slavery existed to produce cotton. Southern states were significantly dependent on Slavery.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Under the Barbados code, the landowners were able to control and sole entire families of slaves. The slaveholders can sell one of the family member of slaves as a profit, punishment, or to pay the debt. The purpose of slave breeding was to produce new slaves without incurring the cost of purchase, to fill labor shortages, and to improve health and productivity of slaves. The involvement of black slaves on their plantations definitely benefited the industry of Colonial America. Despite the mistreatment of the the Africans, the Southern colonies weren’t able to produce as large of an amount of tobacco without them.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Of course, The South did not have as much technological and industrial advancements as The North until after slavery was abolished. The North had more massive industrial factories, as to The South had lived in a more farming community base. At the time, the partial reasoning behind The South supporting slavery was due to the economy and business interest, particularly agriculture. It was more convenient to have slaves working free labor, then to have paid workforces doing all the work, this was the ultimate advantage that affected the region 's economy. The North had believed otherwise, that slavery was taking more jobs away from the whites and argued that slavery was hurting the economy rather than boosting it.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Just as early southern United States was based on slave plantations (due to its fertile land) while United states was based on industry (because of its poor farm land), New England was focused on industry as the Cheseapeke colony was based on plantations. Not only did the colonies in the north not have as good of farming because of the infertile land, the New England colony also had shorter summers and colder temperatures. Even though the New England colonies did not have large plantations to grow crops on, each familie wanted more land (which there was plenty of) so the colony started to spread out and everyone was granted their own share of planting land (Doc. D). The New England colonies had many laborers like workmen and tradesmen instead of almost all farmers or gold miners like in the Chesapeake area in result of the land in New England that was not very good for farming.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sectionalism Essay

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view on slaves in the North wasn’t as harsh compared to the South due to slaves not being as profitable. The Southern States were mainly based and focused on agriculture. There weren’t as many cities as the North had and not as many factories either. Instead of factories, the Southern States had plantations which sustained its plantation based economy. The plantations consisted of large farms and huge lands.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some educated blacks could negotiate their labor contracts; however, it did not ease the atmosphere of their environment. On paper, sharecropping looks like a beneficial partnership for both parties. By limiting the crops sharecroppers could plant, landowners controlled their production and limited the sharecropper’s surplus. Landowners also kept a steady cycle of crops, limiting the time the soil was nourished to produce reasonable crops. In all actuality, landowners devised a scheme to provide laborers for land they could not reasonably work themselves, at a formable…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays