How Did The Crimean War Change The World

Decent Essays
1854 was a year to change the way we think about the world. While the Crimean War had started in the fall of 1853, it was in March of 1854 that Britain and France joined in, turning a regional affair into an international headline. Notorious today for providing game show participants with a headache, the 19th century conflict gave the world a preview of the horrors that war would bring in the 20th century. When a loose coalition of Britain, France, and the Ottomans stood against the Russian giant, many predicted Russia would sweep through the enemies with ease. And while this was true initially, it quickly became clear that both sides were equally met, and there would be no clear victor. Through timely reinforcements by the British and French, the Turks were able to push the Russians back to the border, before all three nations began an attacking into the Crimean peninsula that gave the war its name. With the 11 month siege of Sevastopol, it’s this offensive that would define the war for the butchery and needless violence that it was.

While
…show more content…
Major general were forced to be aware of the effect war would have on the civilian population, and had to account for modern technology that troops may not be well trained with. Despite this, many generals ignored the examples left in the carnage. The Crimean War didn’t result in a major change in borders, or in a massive uprising of the populace, so while cautious generals saw the risks involved in modern war, many prominent military leaders continued to hold archaic beliefs that led the the carnage of the first and second world wars. The Crimean War is a perfect example of why it’s important to look not just at the numbers in history, but at how those numbers, and the people behind them, affected the world, so that we can prevent the mistakes they made. Otherwise, we may very well make the same mistakes, possibly even

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Political leadership guided the North and South landscape, but the military leadership guided the battlefield. The Civil War was a modern war compared to the Napoleonic wars and for the South; Lee is seen by some scholars as a leader out of touch with modern warfare while other generals such as those from the Union were waging a modern style of warfare. In the article, An Old-Fashioned Soldier in a Modern War?: Robert E. Lee as Confederate General, Gary Gallagher takes a historiographical approach of how historians viewed Lee’s method of warfare to answer his question of whether or not Lee was outdated. These historians Gallagher references look at Lee’s aristocratic background, personality, and treatment of civilians as a gauge to determine if Lee was an old-fashioned general as Gallagher puts it.…

    • 2453 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During wars, everyone is but a chess piece, a pawn ready to sacrifice itself for the greater good. As a result, people lose their humanity, becoming one of five million bodies. In World War I especially, lieutenants and generals often expended many soldiers, hoping to receive glory or recognition for their actions, without thinking about the loss of personality and unique traits. Although technologies had advanced, these generals still fought wars in a medieval way. However, following World War I, citizens realized the magnitude of death and began to question the old ways.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Slaughterhouse Province The book I read is entitled “The Slaughterhouse Province: An American Diplomat’s Report on the Armenian Genocide, 1915-1917” (Aristide D. Caratzas Publisher). It is considered the first unearthed eyewitness account from a neutral party, published by a diplomat about killing hundreds of thousands of Armenians who lived in the Ottoman Turkish Empire. The reports in the book were written by Leslie Davis, who was a lawyer and U.S. consul in Harput in eastern Turkey from 1914 to 1917. Susan Blair, a researcher compiling proof of the Armenian genocide found the 132-page report in the National Archives, after they were declassified.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What If Collier was Wrong The Collier brothers say it themselves, “war is futile”, however, is that a professional thought, or just a theme that supports his title? In this essay one could find evidence that war shaped history not hindered it. As previously stated, the Collier brothers say themselves “war is worthless.”…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Great War Dbq

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Throughout history, war has often proven to be a transformative event not only to the countries involved, but also to the soldiers and citizens who lived through and experienced the war. World War 1, also known as the Great War, was one of the most globally transformative events in human history. This war mainly pitted Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire against France, Britain, Russia, and Italy. War is not only tragic, but it transforms the public’s opinion about their enemies and of war in general. The true horrors of war are shown by the effect on the soldier’s minds.…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Tanner Weatherbee Professor Dr. Babb APUSH/AP Language 26 January 2015 Brilliant Compelling Title :) Following the assassination of Austria’s Archduke Francis Ferdinand in the warm summer of 1914, the major powers of Europe―split into two rivaling alliances―mobilized their armed forces and plunged Europe into World War I. By the end of 1917, more than a million French troops had been lost. France’s British, Russian, and Italian allies, along with the Ottoman, German, and Austro-Hungarian enemies, had suffered similar losses.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of Ancient Greece? If not, you wouldn’t know that they had city-states, and they did not like each other. They had many wars with other empires, but mainly the one with themselves. The effects of war are sometimes very dangerous. In Ancient Greece, it got pretty serious.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander II is known today as the “Tsar Liberator. He held a vision of Russia as a major world power, a Russia that was westernized, industrialized, and educated. However, his reforms did not go so smoothly. With many attempts to take his life were made throughout his reign, he was finally assassinated before the completion of his reforms in March 1881. Was the reforms he made deemed a success?…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why Is The Somme Important

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Over the last century, since it happened on the 1st July 1916, the Battle of the Somme has been viewed and qualified as one of the most significant battles in history. It was the first major offensive of the war against the main enemy, the Germans, in which British troops played the leading part. Many different historians in different times have almost opposite opinions/facts about what happened. However, they all agree on one thing: it’s significance. Whether it was due to failures, successes, seen as a ‘sheer bloody murder’ or a big advance in technology at the time, one thing can be fully confirmed: it was not ‘just another battle’.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    War is fought between countries, but even in times of conflict between states, civilian affairs must continue. The Allied governmental leaders “who approved it were neither wicked nor cruel, though it may well be that they were too remote from the harsh realities of war” (Vonnegut 187). Unlike the military leaders, the governmental leaders were not present on the battlefield. Without witnessing the reality of war, the Allied leaders could not hope to grasp the true consequences of their actions. They dealt with numbers and spreadsheets rather than physical brutality.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many things contributed to the cause of World War 1. Some of which were imperialism, nationalism, militarism, and alliances. Nationalism is belief that your country is above all other countries and nations. Imperialism is the controlling of another nation or country by the power of military. Militarism is the belief that a country or nation should have a strong military and be prepared to use it.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The world wars of the 20th Century were without a doubt, the most bloody and disastrous events to ever occur throughout our history. Described as“far more violent in relative as well as absolute terms than any previous era”1, these two major events shaped the modern day and overshadowed any major conflict that occurred beforehand. Events such as The American Civil War, The French Revolutionary Wars and the Napoleonic Wars all took place an entire century prior to these conflicts, yet none of them amount to the sheer scale and loss of life that both world wars accumulated. This essay will demonstrate the catastrophic nature of violence in both World War 1 and World War 2 in comparison to other major conflicts throughout history. The sheer scale of violence will be explored and factors such as war crimes,…

    • 2239 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Great War was a time that made history what it is today. There were so many different events that happened during this time that we will never forget. Included in these different events there were many different consequences, a lot of negative ones at that. These negative effects have really taken a toll on many of the countries that participated in this war. More than 9 million soldiers died fighting for what they believed was right.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Weapons in the 19th Century In the early 19th century war and conflict were common amongst different regions and groups of people. War and fighting was a dreaded event as it took long periods of time and caused injury and death on both sides of the fight. Technology was constantly increasing and new advancements in warfare were always surfacing; some meant to improve fighting tactics and others were intended to end conflict at a faster rate. In the 19th century Warfare was changed tremendously with the development of the musket, the rifle, and the machine-gun as they increased the effectiveness of previous weaponry, changed in design, and increased the death toll.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is War Bad

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One only has to think about the ravages that occurred in several countries not many years ago, in order to estimate the destructive effects of the war. A particularly disturbing aspect of modern wars is that they tend to become global in order to engulf the entire world. A war has the imminent consequence, the death of civilians who have nothing to do with war,…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays