Atomic Bomb Justified Analysis

Superior Essays
The atomic bomb was accredited with the end of World War II but that was not the only thing the atomic bomb should be recognized for. Many argue that the destruction caused by the atomic bomb was unjustifiable due to the sheer loss of life. But the use of the atomic bombs on Japan was justified as it shut the Soviet Union out of Japan and created nuclear deterrence that led to a relatively peaceful era.
The relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were troubled since the Soviet Union’s inception. Before the Soviets rose, the monarchical Russians were in power and entered World War I due to their alliance with Serbia and joined the Allied Powers. But their participation was cut short by a revolution caused by the popular unhappiness
…show more content…
They invaded Manchuria one minute after the declaration of war and trapped the Japanese in Manchuria with a triple pincer move They surrounded the Japanese in order to ensure that the Japanese could not retreat back to Japan as it would cause invading Japan harder. The Soviets had planned the invasion of Japan, but were unable to commence as the Japanese surrendered before they had a chance to. But if they did, they were going to take Japan from the Hokkaido, the northern island of Japan, while the United States would have come from the South. If the Japanese had not surrendered, the Soviets would have invaded and have taken a portion of Japan. That would have been problematic to the recovery of Japan after the war, since the Soviets and the United States would have both instituted their respective ideologies in their portion of Japan. This is similar to what happened to Berlin, the Soviets had one side, and the other democratic Allied powers had the other. The split between East and West Berlin was so extreme that the Soviets constructed a wall to reduce the amount of East Berlin citizens escaping into West Berlin, where condition were superior. Another example of this was on the Korean Peninsula. Even after the surrender of Japan, their forces in Manchuria continued to show resistance against the Soviets. Then in an agreement with the United States, they occupied …show more content…
While this minimized the probability of all out nuclear war, it provokes an arms race due to the country trying to have a first-strike capability. This means that if Country A attacks Country B with nuclear weapons, Country A is able to destroy enough resources and nuclear weapons to thwart retaliation, or a second strike. Due to this the Soviet Union and the United States were constantly in an arms race to gain first-strike capability. That method was one way of tackling the problem, the other was to improve their second strike capability. ICBMs kept safe in underground silos and submarine launched missiles improved second strike capability as it is harder to target and neutralize these targets, eliminating the guarantee of a first strike. When the world saw how much destruction was caused by a single atomic bomb, international politics were revolutionized. Wars could not be waged so easily since the threat of a nuclear strike too overwhelming. This thwarted any nuclear power from attacking another, which led to them fighting proxy wars with each other, unlike the major wars that had devastated the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    4. Conclusion To conclude, it was reasonable for America to bomb the Japanese during World War two, as there are many logical explanations. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unspeakable tragedies but despite many beliefs, the decision of the atomic bombs and the motives of the U.S leaders, have saved many of lives. The U.S was justified as the droppings of atomic bombs were a collaborative method of ending the war, and to hurry up the Japanese’s surrender.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United State wanted to showed the strength to other country. It showed the superiority of the United State to the rest of the world, by showing their possession of atomic weapons. The aim for America was to scare some countries that wanted to attack US, even on the stage of world domination. In one hand, the United State used the atomic bombs has impressed the Soviet Union and halted the war quickly.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During WWII there was one major discovery that not only changed history then, but also continues to change how wars are fought to this day. Yes, this discovery was the atomic bomb. Harry Truemen is credited with saying, “It’s (referring to the atomic bomb) production and its use were not lightly undertaken by this government.” To the general public this might seem like a typical wartime statement. He goes on (in document H) to say that since we had the technology we used it to decimate Japan and stop them from attacking the U.S, but is that all the bomb was used for?…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United State’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War ll is one of the most arguable controversies in American history due to the questionable reasoning behind its use, and the horrific effects it had on Japanese citizens. At the time of the bombing it was actually supported by a vast majority of the American public. During 1945, the decision to use the bomb was not only supported but encouraged. In August of 1945 opinion polls given to the American public showed 85% of Americans supported bombing Japan (Hadley, 21). On the contrary, historians such as Gar Alperovitz have argued Truman used the bomb merely to gain political status and power over the Soviets.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With the destruction the Atomic Bomb had the ability to cause came the role of power. This sense of power was sought after by a majority of involved countries. A weapon this dangerous is a weapon that causes an immense amount of interest from other warring nations, “In Berlin where some of the American work on uranium is now being repeated”(Source 11). Germany specifically was in hot pursuit of the Atomic Bomb, the research being done was not isolated to the United States, nor was it a secret. It is highly likely that had Germany launched the Atomic Bomb campaign before the United States, nuclear warfare would have had a different meaning.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nuclear bombs became a power equalizer between the two nations. The game had changed now that there were two nuclear weapon states and fear of retaliation became a reason for deterrence. There was no possibility of trial and error with deterrence at the…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    December 7th,1941, will always be a somber date in the lives of all American hearts. This day signifies the attack which ultimately forced the involvement of the United States in the second World War. Formerly trying to remain uninvolved and neutral, the Japanese however had other plans, bombing American soil, devastating the U.S. naval base of Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. Not long after, President Roosevelt declared the United States’ involvement in World War II, and start a long four years of fighting that would ultimately culminate in 1945. Fighting against multiple military powers on two fronts, however Japan’s no surrender policy made them especially challenging to defeat.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    being President for two weeks and he had already had a significant decision to make. The bomb was first tested in Alamogordo, Mexico and was successful. In July of 1945 Harry Truman had the decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 . There are two sides to using of this bomb, the traditional and revisionist.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    THE USE OF THE ATOMIC BOMBS..WAS NOT JUSTIFIED By:Nazret T. Harry Truman was not justified for using the atomic bombs on Japan. Two million innocent Japanese lives were taken in an inhumane way, the bombs were not targeted on military bases but on non-soldiers, also Truman based his decisions on racist beliefs. Firstly, the use of the Little Boy and Fat-man not only caused a massacre but the atomic bombs killed the Japanese civilians in a disturbing way.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Soviet Union acquired the bomb in 1949 had changed the way the U.S. viewed the nuclear arms race between themselves and the USSR. In response to the overwhelming news regarding Russia building a small atomic bomb, the U.S created NATO. The United States had realized that they were by no means invincible regarding their advances in american technology. The Suez Crisis, NATO and the Warsaw Pact were some events demonstrating the struggling relations between the U.S and The Soviet Union.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nuclear attack of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justifiable. Due to the fact that the Japanese government was already in the verge of surrendering to the American government.. Also the nuclear bombing was used for several causes, one of which was to cause fear to both the Japanese and Soviet governments. Finally, the bombing of both major cities in Japan caused many deaths, which were not strategic, nor useful towards the war.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Intellectual Achievement

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Intellectual Achievement The United States and the Soviet Union have had multiple stressing issues throughout history prior to and during the time of the second World War. Such issues were deep-seated mistrust and hostility due to the Soviet government withdrawing Russia from the first World War and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. During the second World War the United States and Soviet Union were allies, based on the common aim to defeat Nazi Germany. However, the Soviet Union’s antidemocratic and aggressive policy toward Eastern Europe created tensions even before the war was over.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War Two was a system-changing event in the context of the international system, which eventually materialised in the emergence of the "bi-polar era". The representative leaders who dealt with the aftermath had the benefit of decades of vital political experience, such as Winston Churchill (MP since 1900), Joseph Stalin (Bolshevik revolution, 1917), and Roosevelt (elected 1932 and in fourth term by death in 1945). These were experienced politicians who acted in precise and deterministic ways, and it is of no surprise each rode their own wave of post-war popular support generated by their polarising rhetoric. It is arguable as to what extent the cold-war was preventable or inevitable, so it is of value to analyse the mechanisms and dynamics of events that resulted in the bi-polar system, so we can attain a better understanding of how and why things continue to happen.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since the founding of our nation on July 04, 1776, we have interacted with different countries to carry out our nations’ daily functions. At the same time, relations with Russia can be described as a labyrinthine imbroglio. In other words, the social and economic connections between the two countries have resulted in a complicated as well as confusing situation. Valentina Matviyenko embodies the United States and Russia relationship perfectly by stating, “[o]f course the United States and Russia have different interests. Nevertheless, both are strategic partners” (Brainy Quote).…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays