How Did Philip Contribute To The Greek Military

Great Essays
Philip the II of Macedon came to the throne after a colossal defeat within a year of him coming to the throne by his brother Perdiccas III, within a year of coming to the throne Philip began to evolve a new Macedonian way of war. One of Philip’s great contributions was to create the army with which Alexander conquered the Persian Empire. He was the first Macedonian King to rearm the Macedonian infantry with a sarissa a long spear 18 feet long, nearly twice as long as the usual spear carried by the usual Greek infantry known as hoplites. In rearming the Macedonian army Philip had to do two things first he had to devise new systems of tactics and weapons and the armaments his innovations reflected a change of tactics that changed the face of warfare until the arrival of the Roman legions. To create this army Philip had to pull off a social economic …show more content…
The infantry itself was organized into two components, one was the phalanx (taxeis), a force of 1,536 pikemen that stood sixteen fifteen deep. They stood shoulder to shoulder with an 18-20 foot sarissa, they did not carry the heavy body armor of Greek infantry which made them extremely manoeuvrable on the battlefield. They were largely equipped with leather jackets, leather helmets and a small shield which was worn around the shoulder and they stood in close formation the first six ranks their spears pointed out and the back ten ranks held their spears at an angle to deflect any arrows, slings, or javelins that were hurled their way. This force would then pin the enemy front and the cvalry would encircle and you would have a battle of encirclement with the object of complete annihilation of the enemy. The objective was not to break the enemy and pursue it which was the technique of the old form of hoplite

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    With soldiers up front equipped with the legendary sarisa spears, 18 feet long, Alexander “led his cavalry out to the right” (Wasson, “Battle of Gaugamela”). Afraid of being outflanked by Alexander, Darius “ordered his left wing…to keep pace with Alexander's outflanking movements” (Wasson, “Battle of Gaugamela”). This maneuver by Darius III proved to be a fatal mistake. By moving his calvary, Darius unknowingly opened up a gap in the center of his army, thus giving Alexander an opening, and launched a “determined assault on the center” (Wasson, “Battle of Gaugamela”) of Darius’s army.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Philip conquered Greek city-states and planned to fight the strongest empire, the Persian Empire. At age 20 his father King Philip was tragically assassinated, which left him to take the rule and finish what his father started. The Persian Empire was the strongest in the world, which gave Alexander the motivation to fight. He pushed through Persian controlled land, across Asia…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander’s army relied heavily on lightly- armored phalanx formations with long pikes, called sarsissas, that were up to 20 feet long, special “wedge” formations to increase the volume of troops in order to be more effective in combat, and a strong cavalry that consisted of two different units, including a unit that fought with Alexander himself. After the death of his father, Alexander made the Macedonian army much larger and made it into a main focus of Macedonian culture. He also commissioned engineers to develop and create new siege weapons. All of his troops were also equipped with very light armor to help them with mobility and allowed Alexander to make adjustments to his formations easily. (Mishkov, 2015)…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Philip The Great Tactics

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Philip II was a Macedonian king who ended up ruling over much of Greece through war and words( he was able to take over thermopylae through negotiation and made friends with many politicians of the small cities of Greece). He ruled over his empire until he was assassinated in 336 BCE and his son, Alexander the great would take over his empire, further adding and producing one of the biggest land empires ever. But none of that couldn’t have happened if it wasn’t for King Philip whose tactics in war and politics took over one of the strongest empires of their time. Cementing him as one of the best leaders of his era.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander of Macedon: A Great Leader Being the first person to conquer the Egyptian, Greek, and Persian empires in just over a decade was no walk in the park, and neither was integrating a culture into all of those empires nor attempting to unite them all. Alexander of Macedon was this man: he conquered the greatest empires, spread the Greek influence, and lead in a unique way with his inspiring character that he is famous for. Although he was not the ideal leader such as Plato’s idea of a philosopher-king, he was an ethical man who wanted his people content. His well-known title, “Alexander the Great,” was very appropriate for him: his fine character and social goals, his unique political leadership and strategic conquering, and his economic…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most well known formation was developed by the Greeks and was called the Hoplite Phalanx. This was a formation where they would lock their shields together and project their spears over the shields. This would build a shield wall and the group of soldiers would point their spears toward the enemy which would act as a barrier to protect them. The development of this tactic had much influence on our modern strategy of “fire and movement.” This strategy is performed when troops line up in waves and take turns firing weapons at the enemy.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They’d assemble their fighting forces, but they would also set princes, women, and children on horses a distance away facing the enemy. Sometimes, they would even create figures, and set them on horses to give an appearance of a great fighting force. Then, they would send prisoners from other nationalities ahead to face the enemy head-on. Other columns of stronger men dispatch far off to the left, and to the right, so they are not seen by the enemy. Then they close in and surround the enemy, fighting them from all sides.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Main Idea: The Greek city-states were not united until King Philip II of Macedonia united them with his kingdom. Subtopic: A Plan to Win Greece-Macedonia was a land that lay North of Greece. The Macedonians raised sheep and grew crops in the river valley. Their army fought on horseback, and around 400 B.C. became a large empire.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander spent a great deal of his life in the company of his army, inherited from his father, Philip. With so many years shared between the troops and Alexander, it was crucial to Alexander’s success that his men trust him, follow him, and fight for him without question. In the early years of Alexander’s career as ruler of Macedonia and leader of the army, his determination for conquest was shared by his men. Alexander led his troops into many successful battles and triumphs, such as the Battles of Gaugamela, Issus, and Granicus. In each of these places, Alexander’s leadership skills were tested, and they prevailed.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The eleventh general was called the polemarch –or commander-in-chief- who voted on what to do with the army if the other ten couldn’t come to an agreement. Despite being heavily outnumbered the Greeks military strategy helped them win the decisive battle at…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the different army compositions, some tactics that were available to one empire were not available to the other. This is why the tactics used by each empire are extremely different. The Romans used a revolutionary battle formation called a Testudo. In a Testudo, Roman men would lock their shields on top and at the side of their regiment, almost like a tortoises shell. This shell was used to block incoming fire and gave the Roman men an extremely safe way to advance on the battle field.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The army of Alexander the Great contained troops with spears in the left hand, on top of their shields (Everson 11). Alexander the Great was able to push the enemy back, because his shielded troops repelled the defenseless enemy with their spears. Although the Macedonian army were equipped with the Phrygian helmet, Alexander the Great equipped his soldiers with Boeotian helmet because they were lighter, allowed the troops to view the battlefield, provided protection, cheap to manufacture, and the troops were able to hear instructions…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander went to aid Parmenion because of high pressure from Mazaeus and Persian cavalry passing through the Macedonian line. The cavalry looted the base rather than attacking the left from the…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The life and history of Alexander the Great, and the empire that he formed, has been studied by people ever since his death. Alexander’s empire ruled over a large portion of land from Greece in the west to India, in the east. His actions brought an end to the long standing conflict that the Persians and Greeks had with each other, established multiple cities that bore his name across the land that he conquered, had a major influence on future rulers, and had remnants that lasted until the time of the Roman Empire. Alexander not only had a prominent place in history, but he also contributed to advancements in military tactics of the ancient world. The life of Alexander had a far reaching effect on world history that lasted for centuries after his death, and the study of his life can help a person understand various facets of history that were inspired or influenced by his actions.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays