Japan, china and the USA have been going back and forth with each other for the longest. This has changed the countries socially, politically, and economically, but for now I will explain how Japan Attacking Pearl Harbor, The Lend-Lease Act, and some visual pictures socially affected these countries. Japan’s attacks on Pearl Harbor socially affected Japan because according to an excerpts from The Way of the Subjects from 1941, it states, “ The way of the subjects is to be loyal to the Emperor in disregard of self, thereby supporting the imperial Thorne coexistence with the Heaven and the Earth.” This shows how japanese students are being educated and taught to look up to the emperor. This proves that The pearl Harbor attack socially changed
…show more content…
According to a Works Projects Administration War Services Project poster, published in Pennsylvania between 1941 and 1943, it shows the first diverse group of armed forces. This shows how the US was socially affected because the US slowly letting more african americans and women join the military, so they could also have jobs and something to do. Another way these countries where socially affected was from a United States Office of War Information photo, dated October 1942, it shows a teacher teaching a young class about resources the families can bring in to support the military. This proves The US was socially affected about kids are growing up and being educated around the war. And they will know more about it than the other countries, this also prepares them if they want to join the …show more content…
According to section 3 or the National Archives Document, page 104 of “U.S. History: A Document- Based Skill Book” It states, “...the president may, from time to time, when he deems it in the interest of national defense, authorize the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or the head of any other department or agency of the Government-” In other words the the president can take power to authorize Secretary of War. There for the lend-lease act affected the US socially because if they are practicing war or preparing war in private the people will be negatively affected because they won't be prepared if war actually happened. Also according to the same source it states, “whenever the President deems such purchase or acquisition to be necessary in the interests of the defence of the United States.” In short the president is also preparing for war, and being ready if it occurs. Therefore the other countries trying to attack the US are socially negatively affected because one, they won't be ready for the US to already be prepared. And two if the other countries lose the families will suffer and they won't be able to allie with the US and won't get those resources for the people to
According to a Works Projects Administration War Services Project poster, published in Pennsylvania between 1941 and 1943, it shows the first diverse group of armed forces. This shows how the US was socially affected because the US slowly letting more african americans and women join the military, so they could also have jobs and something to do. Another way these countries where socially affected was from a United States Office of War Information photo, dated October 1942, it shows a teacher teaching a young class about resources the families can bring in to support the military. This proves The US was socially affected about kids are growing up and being educated around the war. And they will know more about it than the other countries, this also prepares them if they want to join the …show more content…
According to section 3 or the National Archives Document, page 104 of “U.S. History: A Document- Based Skill Book” It states, “...the president may, from time to time, when he deems it in the interest of national defense, authorize the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or the head of any other department or agency of the Government-” In other words the the president can take power to authorize Secretary of War. There for the lend-lease act affected the US socially because if they are practicing war or preparing war in private the people will be negatively affected because they won't be prepared if war actually happened. Also according to the same source it states, “whenever the President deems such purchase or acquisition to be necessary in the interests of the defence of the United States.” In short the president is also preparing for war, and being ready if it occurs. Therefore the other countries trying to attack the US are socially negatively affected because one, they won't be ready for the US to already be prepared. And two if the other countries lose the families will suffer and they won't be able to allie with the US and won't get those resources for the people to