How Did Marx Contribute To A Better Society

Improved Essays
Marx was German and was born in Prussia. His thesis being something along the lines that one should not look at theology to explain human history, but one should look at philosophy. In London, he did most of his writings and he wrote for newspapers around the world to pay his bills. He had an organization that promoted the ideas of socialism. Marx is going to say that in modern historical time, the two big classes are the bourgeoisies, which was in power, and the class that is out of power is the proletarians. According to Marx’ model, he will call them internal conflicts which will eventually resolve into a better society. More specifically, Marx is going to say right now in current society, the bourgeoisies pretends to be for all the people …show more content…
Marx talks about his narrative about how we got this class divide that we have present today. Broadly speaking for Marx, the Bourgeoisie comes from the middle ages. Back historically, the class in power was the feudal class and the bourgeoisie started to gain power when they became the merchants. They were the ones who were using this system of the new market. They used trade and industry in a way that feudal lords did not. Eventually, this led the Bourgeoisie to be the revolutionary class. They are the ones who overthrew mobility. The bourgeoisie were the instigators of the end of the rule of the feudal system. Notice that for Marx, the Bourgeoisie haven’t always been the bad guys. At this part of history, they did a great job at promoting freedom by overthrowing this feudal system. However, as time goes on and the bourgeoisie gains more wealth and power, eventually they become the elites. What started out, as this small factory owner soon became these large corporations. The way in which these new values and norms are generated from a Bourgeoisie society says the most important thing is getting wealth. You need workers where you pay low wages to make these large corporations …show more content…
There are two things I will talk about. First, Marx talks about the disappearance of the little workshop. Marx is going to argue that the middle class in general is disappearing under capitalism. For example, if you own a small shop that you run with your family and you are making fabric. Now what is going to happen to your workshop when the huge fabric corporation moves next door and can sell it at half the price that you can sell it. Your workshop goes out of business and you can’t compete with this. This is what Marx is saying is happening to modern capitalistic companies. What happens to the small businesses and middle class is that they are getting forced out of their companies and they must work for these companies for much less. Marx thinks that this process is getting more intense as corporations get bigger and bigger. So the middle class is disappearing into the proletarian class. You will only have a small group of the very rich and everyone else will be living paycheck to paycheck. Marx is comparing the organization of companies and calling them despotic. Marx believes that even though the workers know how to do things more efficiently, they are the lowest of the totem pole. Marx thinks that’s odd. We trust the common person to elect our political leaders, yet this democracy hasn’t split in the work place. Marx talks a little

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This will lead to the unemployment rate to rise. Marx focuses on the working conditions of the employees. He blames the rises means of production will only harm the proletarians. He declares “Not only are the…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    YeJoon Kang HST 103_06 Professor Borbonus 10 February 2015 Karl Marx & Samuel Smiles During the time of Industrialization, Europe and the United States were the leading exporters in the global markets. It was most difficult for the working class when there was an abundant amount of supplies, also known as surplus of products once in demand. One of many reasons they were suffering was because; “As more and more factories were built to produce the same commodity…competitors slashed prices by slashing wages” (Marks 136). Many similar problems were practiced in the time.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Marx assert that implementing these laws would not directly combat the root of the problem in the first place. While Mill might have argued that lack of government oversight over the safety of the workers caused the factory collapse, Marx would argue that class distinctions in bourgeois society leads to the conditions that caused the factory to collapse; the factory owners valuing their workers solely by the value of their labor. In “the Communist Manifesto” Marx states that “modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few,” (Marx 170). Marx asserts that the bourgeois system of private property elevates the bourgeoise owners of private property and production, over the proletariat who produce for the bourgeoise. In their pursuit of private property, the bourgeoise devalue the work of the proletariat and begin to exploit their labor for gain.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Like the classical economists, he focused on the dynamic evolution of capitalism as a system, and the turbulent relationships between different classes. ”(Stanford p.54) During the Mid-nineteenth century, Marx opposed capitalism, believing “payment of profit on private investments did not reflect any particular economic function” (Stanford p.54). Marx is saying that the workers aren’t getting paid for the amount of work they put in. Capitalists were exploiting these workers and rather than sharing the wealth/profits, they were paying the workers a diminished amount (Labor Theory of Value).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of the capitalist is to achieve the largest profit margin as possible. The workers can usually never own anything except their labor, which is their means of making money. Marx lived during the industrial revolution, which saw the advent of tremendous wealth due to the large number of factories being built during this time. Living and working conditions were sub par for the working class during these times. People worked really long and laborious hours for generally a small amount of money, which in turn made the factory owners abundantly wealthy.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Just like in Marxist theory there had to be the ruling class that was on top of the food chain, “the better ones” or the Elite. Marx believed that division of labor-class struggle and all other social institutions maintained the status quo. For example “Most of us are aware that certain material realities help determine the quality of our lives and the opportunities available to us”. (Hall 76) In this case money is usually always the factor that limits opportunity for many.”…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Porter Income Inequality

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He also shows that the portion of national income owned by the bottom fifth of the population changes in both directions (although more heavily downward) over time. This reflects processes of ebbs and flows, which once again contrast Marx’s vision of a one-way street toward equality through the breakdown of class. Finally, Marx argued that the proletariat would gain a sense of “class consciousness” and rebel against the bourgeoisie, giving way to a more equal society. In this article, though, there is no mention of any revolutionary sentiments among the working class against the capitalists. This may add a level of complexity to Marx’s theory where there may be other factors that promote solidarity other than class.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx said there were two classes of people in the world. The first was the ruling class or as he called them the bourgeoisie [bo͝orZHwäˈzē]. The second was the workers of the world which he called the proletariat [prōləˈterēət] (Kishlansky, 2009). During his lifetime he saw that the bourgeoisie had set up a system were the proletariat were set in a system of wage slavery. As he put it, they were paid a minimum wage for their labor that only gave them enough capital to cover the bare minimum of existence.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He divided the population into two groups: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie was the ruling class; they own the means of production and, because of this, control the people. The proletariat operates the means of production, and is controlled by the bourgeoisie. Marx claimed that everyone fit into one of these groups. Marx’s two social classes are very apparent in Fahrenheit 451’s society.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Marx’ view the end of feudal society didn’t end the class struggle it only simplified it. Marx believed that there were two emerging classes forming within society that were opposed and moving farther and farther apart they were the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. He believed the first elements of the bourgeoisie spawned from burgesses of the Middle Ages then expanded with the discovery of America. The increased commerce that spawned lead to a new impulse. The feudal system of industry was replaced, guilds vanished.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Marx said himself in one of his publishings “Society as a whole is splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.” (Marx & Engles (1872, TCM, cited in SOCI101 Marx 3 lecture content). One conflict between the two classes is the process of alienation for the proletariat and Marx was interested in the effects of the capitalist mode of production upon the proletariat. Alienation can be seen “within all of the renowned social theories of the civilised epoch”, the main idea being that “some time in the past people lived in harmony, and then there was some kind of rupture which left people feeling like foreigners in the world, but some time in the future this alienation would be overcome and humanity would again live in harmony with itself and Nature.” (Marxists.org,…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    grows in power as bureaucratic organizations expand in numbers (3/15). Another theory of Weber’s is that we need to look at history to make sense of society. Capitalistic history has been dispersed in many forms throughout history. He looks at specific societies and at specific time periods. Generalized key components are the ideal type of capitalism in its purest form.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays