How Did Lyndon B. Johnson's Speech In The Vietnam Speech

Improved Essays
The Vietnam war was a very controversial war. Many believed that it was too bloody of a war, with no reward for the loses. However, during Lyndon B. Johnson’s presidency, he strongly believed that there was a need to help South Vietnam become independent. During his speech at Johns Hopkins University, he updates the audience on the war, explains why we are at war, and lastly shares his goals for war. This speech was given in 1965, a year after the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which led Johnson to enter the United States into war in Vietnam.
The speaker in this source is President Lyndon B. Johnson. Johnson was part of the Democratic party and took office after Kennedy’s assassination in 1963. Johnson grew up in poverty and wanted to help people
…show more content…
He also wants to share his goal for the outcome of war. He tells the Audience that we are fighting to protect South Vietnam because “since 1954 every American president has offered support to the people of South Vietnam” (132). He also claims we are there to show other people outside of South- East Asia that America will be there to help if they are attacked as well. By stating his reasons why he sent the U.S to fight in Vietnam he is appealing to those who believe in loyalty, and also those who believe in zero sum gain. By helping a state like South-Vietnam, who is under communist attack, Johnson shows that a lost to communism is a lost America cannot afford. Johnson is also trying to persuade the audience that the U. S’s presence in Vietnam is necessary, by acknowledging those who do not believe that we have a responsibility there, or believe that our efforts will not gain results. He Counter argues the people that believe this, by stating that the U.S has the right to help fight “for the defense of freedom” (132). He then explicitly tells the audience that the only way for a peaceful settlement is that South Vietnam becomes independent, which he defines as “securely guaranteed and able to shape its own relationship to all others- free from outside interference- tied to no alliance- a military base for no other” (133). This appeals to those who believe that containment is necessary because he states that he will not stop fighting until South Vietnam does not have the threat of communism anymore, while also appealing to those that believe that appeasement never works. Johnson’ s speech intends to inform and persuade the audience why the U.S is in Vietnam, and what his goal for the war

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    President Lyndon B. Johnson made the decision to send troops to Vietnam and to bomb the North to stop communism in Vietnam. That decisions is about the outcome of the Vietnam War that the United States was all in this war. Even though the citizen do not like that the U.S was in this war, it did not matter because President Johnson is all in.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As the aid rose from $10 million in 1950 to $100 million in 1951, which meant that the there was a reduction of funds and attention for President Johnson’s Great Society program. The reduction of U.S. forces in Vietnam would provide more attention to our own war Americans were experiencing at home, which was the War on Poverty. If President Johnson would have reduce or withdraw U.S. forces his Great Society would have been more effective to Americans rather than involving in another country’s war. The reduction of U.S. military involvement would have create a more memorable presidency of success for Johnson rather than having over 58,000 American casualties and paying eighty percent of the cost of the Vietnam War.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Vietnam War is one of the longest and most divisive wars in US history. U.S entry into the war was largely due to misperceptions about Vietnam by U.S policymakers, including US presidents. President Kennedy and President Johnson were both responsible for the escalation of US involvement in Vietnam. In this essay, I will discuss which US president, Kennedy or Johnson, was most responsible for US involvement in the Vietnam War. First, I will discuss why President Kennedy is responsible for US involvement in the Vietnam War.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States servicemen and women wrote letters home consisting their interpretations of the Vietnam war. In the “Why We Fight” letters, I found the perception of Ho Chi Minh and North Vietnam interesting. Lieutenant Marion Lee Kemper wrote, “We are here because we think this is where we must fight to stop a communist threat.” The troops did not know why they were in Vietnam. The troops acquiesced President Johnson’s assertion to stop the spread of Communism.…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although President Lyndon B. Johnson was considered a good leader, he portrayed himself as not being strategic when he dealt with the United States’ participation in the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War was a conflict between North and South Vietnam that lasted from 1955 - 1975. North Vietnam was led by a Communist and nationalist government while the South was led by a non-Communist government headed by Ngo Dinh Diem. The Viet Cong, a Communist guerrilla force in the South, however, was fighting to overthrow the Diem government and they were being supported by the Communists in the North. Like Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy before him, President Johnson did not want Communism to spread to South Vietnam.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In the years following the Vietnam War, reports of high rates of miscarriages, premature births, congenital birth defects, and infant mortality began to surface from regions in the Vietnam War where Agent Orange was used” (King). Men exposed to these herbicides “had increased rates of neural tube defects, especially Spina Bifida, and to a lesser degree anencephaly” (King). Anencephaly is when a baby is born without “a forebrain, which is responsible for thinking and coordination” (“Definition”). In Johnson’s Highway Beautification speech, he referred to himself as “your President” implicating that he yearned for the trust of the American people and trust that he cared about what they believed in and wanted and that he is there to help (Johnson). However, his decision to use herbicides in Vietnam to win the war at any cost and to cause many innocent people long-term health defects illustrates nothing of the sort.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arguably more influential to U.S. policymakers than the fear of monolithic communism was the belief that “loss” of Vietnam would result in severe domestic backlash. This conclusion was drawn as a result of the domestic response to President Truman’s perceived “loss” of China. In the domestic sphere, both politically and publicly, Truman was vilified for being weak on communism and jeopardizing the safety of the United States as well as its allies. The Republican Party exploited these criticisms a great deal, gaining political capital by using the loss of China to strip the Democratic Party of any legitimacy in areas concerning national security. Ultimately, when examining the situation in Vietnam, the Johnson Administration could not help but…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Logevall claims that committing to war in Vietnam was a terrible mistake. Logevall begins by showing some sympathy to President Lyndon Johnson and other leaders at the time, as they believed that the strategies they had would work. He then goes on to state that “vocal proponents of taking the war to North Vietnam were strikingly few in number”4. He states this to show the overwhelming rejection of support to go to Vietnam by many American leaders of the time, other than Johnson. Logevall also suggests that even other countries were skeptical of being able to win in a long-term battle with the Viet Cong.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This speech illustrates Johnson’s attempt to appease the African-Americans and create justice for them through connecting with American citizens as a whole. The President’s passionately portrays…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He told his audience “[the Vietnam War] had exposed the hypocrisy of American policy and the emptiness of Johnson’s solemn words about freedom and democracy.” Potter pointed out, for example, that the United States talked about defending freedom in Vietnam but Diem, an oppressive dictator, was placed into power. From this speech, it is clear that Potter (and other New Left protesters) did not think the war was accomplishing any good and was even making the situation in Vietnam worse. In American since the end of World War 2, was a general trend towards a larger role for the government in domestic and foreign affairs.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Vietnam War happened from 1954 until 1975. It was a long, bloody and costly conflict between North Vietnam and its southern allies, Viet Cong, and the South Vietnam and its principal ally, the United States to combat communist forces. However, United States didn’t participate in the war from the beginning. Ball considered that United States involvement in the Vietnam War would be unsuccessful, firstly because United States didn’t have the right equipment that could compete with the “guerrilla warfare tactics”. Secondly, since the war was fought on their territory, they knew it better than anybody else and since Vietnam didn’t really cooperate with U.S. forces that would make it difficult for U.S to spread in their society.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lyndon B. Johnson did not stick to the status quo during his effort to persuade Congress to pass his Voting Rights Act. Although he was born and raised in Stonewall, Texas he was not predisposed to be a supporter of racial justice. This speech was written not only to congress but also to the American people during the Civil Rights Movement. He wanted them to understand, “Every American citizen must have an equal right to vote.” (Johnson)…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It showed that the end of the war was not in sight and despite the massive death toll and the American protests 200 000 new troops were called into South Vietnam. But within the American government there was division as some people thought that the United States should be scaling down their involvement in the war. President Johnson said that he was scaling down on the bombing of North Vietnam. He also…

    • 2489 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1970’s was a controversial time in American history, and the Vietnam conflict was no exception. President, Richard Nixon, in his Cambodian Incursion address, speaks to the American people, and the world about developing situations in Southeast Asia. His intentions are to explain the actions of the North Vietnamese, describe the actions he ordered to counter them, and to give reason for why he is justified in his course of action. Nixon adopts a stern tone in his address to show the world that what the North Vietnamese is doing will not be tolerated, and that his course of action is logical and is in the best interest of not only South Vietnam and the United States, but of Cambodia as well. Nixon begins his address by referencing his report…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Johnson’s “Speech on Vietnam” delivered on September 29th, 1965 at John Hopkins University, he continues Kennedy’s trend of imperialist rhetoric disguised as responsible foreign policy. To start, he argues that South Vietnam’s freedom is in danger of falling under “the deepening shadow of Communist China” ignoring the fact that communism in Vietnam is enacted by the Northern part of Vietnam, and not China (Johnson 1965). The majority of Johnson’s speech draws on imperialist rhetoric, dictating that America has a responsibility to support freedom in a global context, ignoring the very real effects of violence in order to achieve such a valiant claim. In response to the escalating brutalities, Johnson strategically speaks to it from abstract point of view, obscuring the audience’s understanding regarding the amounts of American bodies…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays