How Did Julius Caesar Corrupt

Improved Essays
he still had what it took, and he was eager to shower himself in glory. In a fit of greed Caesar nearly started the largest war in history up to that point.
To further the point, the Famous Roman Dictator Julius Caesar was many things, he was greedy, he corrupt, he was cold, and maybe worst of all Caesar was Brutal and indiscriminately so, he killed regardless of race, sex or, religion. If he wanted someone dead, they would die. this is the case with the Rhine River massacre. As is shown, by Theodore Dodge (1892) in the book Caesar when he writes, “All including Women, Children were indiscriminately butchered to the number of four hundred and thirty thousand souls.” (p.155) Gaius Julius Caesar was a murder, he killed those who were in his way. Women, men, children,
…show more content…
On that fateful day by the Rhine river, there was a massacre, it was uncalled for and undeserved, and the criminal who committed the act remained free for the rest of his life until, of course, the day he was killed. Even the dictators fellow, Romans, did not approve of his actions as is shown by Dodge (1892), “... Cato openly proposed that Caesar's head should be sent to the surviving Usipetes…” (p.155). As one can see, even Caesars fellow Romans were horrified by the atrocities that he had committed. Even going so far as to openly condemn him and call for his death. Few people agree with what Caesar did that fateful day when he wiped out an entire civilization which is probably one of the first known acts of genocide in history. Few historians say that what he did was good or even called for, what Caesar did on the battlefield was monstrous and only served to seals his fate. Not only was Caesar brutal on the battlefield, he was cruel at home as well which is explained by Denise Rinaldo (2010), “Caesar gladiator shows were the most brutal and elaborate Rome had ever seen.”(p.54) Gladiator battles were not uncommon, in ancient-Rome, however, that does not mean much because even by Roman

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    They were afraid he was going to try to make himself the king of Rome and destroy the government. On March 15, 44BC, a day forever known as the ides of March, Brutus, Cassius and their accomplices assassinated Caesar by overtaking him in a senate session and stabbing him. Two of the major sources of information on Julius Caesar are the familiar Shakespeare play bearing his name, and Caesar’s chapter in the philosopher and writer Plutarch’s book “Parallel Lives”. While both of these sources give us a good look at Caesar’s life and accomplishments, they have two very different stances on the moral character of the man.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because Caesar preferred the dignity of war over the humiliation of a process, Caesar chose to rebel. There were many serious decisions that were made, and no matter what the choice was it would hurt someone else. Excessive PrideThe Assassination of Julius Caesar, 44 BC. (n.d.). Retrieved May 22, 2018, from http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/caesar2.htmCaesar had a lot of accomplishments.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of Caesar receiving punishment he was full of intent to seek revenge, another foolish idea for a man that is well educated and that has been in many wars and battles being victor of them all with a his army that was trained to fight. Coming off what would be his most embarrassing defeat, one would think that Caesar would humble himself and be grateful his wife is unharmed and that he isn’t dead. But that isn’t Caesar. Caesar was indeed full of himself, in some ways prideful.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Gaius Julius Caesar was a brilliant man who did many things to benefit the people of Rome, the conspirators were completely justified in the decision to assassinate him. Towards the end of his life and political career, Caesar became a tyrannical and dictatorial man who violated widely accepted values of being a just ruler. He seemed to desire copious amounts of power which could not be granted by following the rules. An example of this would be the fact that he appointed himself dictator for life. He even violated Plato’s values of being a fair ruler (wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice), which were widely accepted views even in the Late Republic.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus and the conspirators kill Julius Caesar, most of the conspirators have the wrong intentions and do it because they will benefit from his death, opposed to Brutus who does it with good reasoning such as it benefiting Rome. After the conspirators kill Caesar Brutus talks about how he did love Caesar but killing him would be for the good of Rome, despite his feelings. “If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not because I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (III.II 23-4). Although Brutus was a good friend of Caesar he knew that all the signs pointed to him becoming a tyrant which he knew would be harmful to Rome.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Caesar was a great leader and had many close allies, they began to second guess him due to his arrogance. The conspirators were afraid he was gaining too much power and was going to abuse it. In Act 2, Scene 2 of Julius Caesar, he states, “The things that threatened me ne’er looked but on my back; when they shall see the face of Caesar, they are vanished.” The amount of leadership he had was not natural for a man. This led to his death when all his “allies” murdered him.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Caesar had planned to fight in a war on the Ides of March (March 18th) although his wife had had a dream where he died, which is considered to be a bad omen. As he entered a hall the people ambushed him, and each of the senators quite literally “took a stab at him.” This surprised many who lived in Rome, and things from then on became insanely chaotic. “He was not an emperor, but no one could have predicted that the result of his death would lead eventually to the emergence of the Roman Empire.” (100,…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caesar was loved by the people but not by the higher ups in Rome, who feared his rise of power (Shmoop). People of Rome had abandoned their work to celebrate Caesar. During this time in the Roman Republic, anyone’s rise in power from the people was viewed as a threat. However, Caesars death results in a Roman Civil War. If you think about power in our…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and you may be the better judge. If there is any friend of Caesar's in this assembly, I loved Caesar the same that you loved him. If, then, that friend asks why I rose against Caesar, this is my answer, it’s not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Would you rather have him living but we all die as salves, or that Caesar were dead but we live as free man? I cry for Caesar for he was good to me.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare’s political play Julius Caesar is one in which its namesake, Caesar, is murdered by a group of conspirators. Following this, Brutus attempts to persuade the audience that he acted for the best interest of Rome, claiming that Caesar would have become a dictator. However, the commoners of Rome were never satisfied with the reasoning for Caesar’s death. This was caused due to multiple reasons, mainly which they had already established their support for Caesar and Brutus’ inadequate speech which fails to justify his actions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Selfish

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Selfishness, fear, cowardice and betrayal are all characteristics found in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. These traits are not found in Julius Caesar himself, but in the men who wrongfully murdered the soon-to-be king of the Roman Empire. Unlike his killers, Caesar’s love for Rome and its people, combined with his superb military ability, show that Caesar was a good man who was fit to lead Rome. Caesar was a good leader.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, questions have arisen about when it is right to kill someone or not. There are usually two sides to this controversy: it is never right to kill someone, or it is better to kill one person and save thousands of lives than to risk the death of thousands of people. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, it can be argued that Caesar truly did deserve to die for various reasons. In Julius Caesar, Caesar deserved his fate because he had many physical weaknesses that held him back, he was too power-hungry and egotistical, and he would have ultimately hurt Rome more than helped it.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The title alone of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare speaks volumes about the nature of Caesar’s death. Labeling the leader’s fall as a tragedy creates an aura of sadness around the loss, portraying his murder as an unfortunate and brutal occurrence. However, the motives of the conspirators that ended Caesar’s life were not wholly ruthless. Rather, this group of men sought to save Rome from the tyranny and negligence that they believed was being perpetrated by Caesar himself. The fact that their intentions were honest and their violence was limited to the bare minimum suggests that the death of Caesar is better described as a sacrifice than a butchery.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He says to the his legion, “Caesar, too, for his own honor, ought to sacrifice his desires and resentment to the public good” (Caesar Ch.8). He mentions how generous he is with his soldiers, giving them money from his own pocket after successful campaigns. He was quick to reward loyalty, especially where civilians were concerned. He listened to the opinions of his officers rather than making all the decisions…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A tragic hero is a character who develops an action that leads to a tragic flaw and can cause their fault. Brutus, in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is a tragic character because he posses the flaw of being naive and has poor judgement. A tragedy is dealing with tragic events and having an unhappy ending, especially one concerning the downfall of the main character. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, takes place in ancient Rome where there is a celebration being held in honor of Julius Caesar for defeating Pompey.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays