How Did John Locke Rebel

Improved Essays
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are both very influential thinkers of the middle 1600’s. Both Locke and Hobbes had two different viewpoints on people and society. John Locke insisted that when the government violated individual rights, people are permitted to rebel. However, Thomas Hobbes thought otherwise. Hobbes believed that people had no right to be rebellious. Thomas Hobbes is correct, people should not rebel even if the government violates individual rights because it could lead to a destruction of a society. People are not bad nor are they good. People are cruel, greedy, and selfish. Not all humans believe or think about the same thoughts. Everybody has different opinions towards many situations and different ideas. Many people are in constant battle with others. You can see this in many countries and organizations. If there is a question being asked, not everyone is going to respond with a “yes, I agree”, there will always be someone who disagrees with a question, idea, opinion, statement, or whatever it is being said. This is why if no laws are established in …show more content…
The country would never be able to be the same without a stabled a government. Even now we do not have a stabled government, but we do have laws that tells us what we can and cannot do. The country would also not attract any tourists because of the corruption the bad people and things have brought upon it.
People know between right and wrong. Obviously people do, but some chose to ignore their conscience. If people did not know what was right, then how would they decide that murder is wrong? Not just murder but theft, torture, assault, vandalism, and other forms of wrong doing. The problem is that some people do the wrong actions even though they know it is very wrong. They also know that it will lead them to have very bad consequences, if they have to deal with

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It was not perfect, the government would be based off of civic virtue and common good. This idea eventually turned into today’s government (A Constitutional Government with three branches and a system of checks and balances). As Locke said, “ In a state of nature, most people would act with kindness, but those who don’t cause havoc.” This quote says that the people who use their power incorrectly, will destroy the government from the inside out. This is another way of saying that if the government uses a true republic as their government, it will be full of corruption.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke was one of the men during the Enlightenment period who believed that the citizens have certain rights that cannot be taken away. These rights include life, liberty, and protection of one’s property. He believed that the people should have the right to choose the government, who protects these rights. In America, the colonies were being ruled by Great Britain and were forced to abide by any laws that they had set into motion for them. Thomas Jefferson took Locke’s ideas and made his own rights, that include, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, for the people stated in The Declaration of Independance.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was born April 5, 1588, Westport, Wiltshire. Thomas Hobbes had different ideas than most of the other philosophers. He believed that people needed to be ruled by a king. The reason for this was because, he would state that people were naturally selfish and wicked. Thomas Hobbes thought it would be great for the government to have power over the people.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the other hand, a philosopher, Thomas Hobbes believed…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both changed history. They both had different ideas on humanity and…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke points out the freedom of the ruled over the rights of the sovereign. Locke favors a legislature government over a monarch. He puts up in mind an administration with the fear of concentrated power. For Locke, the most horrible form of the regime is tyranny, consequently, as much as possible; he puts the power to the hands of the people, where Hobbes prefers the sovereign. The government of Locke obtains its rule directly from the citizens, whereas Hobbes’s monarch rules absolutely.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The health of society is greatly affected by the power of the government. When that power is too weak, the government cannot do its job, but when it is too strong, the leaders may abuse their power and oppress the citizens. In a perfect world citizens would monitor the actions of their government to prevent abuses of power. However, we all born to be free and every one is equal. As Thomas Paine argues in his “Common sense” that we should have control in government, instead of let them to control us.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Unjust

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Conscience saves Souls Man makes mistakes, man-made law might be a product of mistakes. Disobey the law when your conscience tells you the law is unjust and against humanity. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. writes, “an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law” (King). Authorities always create the unjust law and cover them with beautiful lies to fake them as just laws, then trick the people to obey them.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Locke and Hobbes disagreed about the nature of people, both of them made a point of stating that people had inalienable rights. Locke’s whole basis of philosophy was based on the belief that every human had natural rights, rights that existed…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In determining whether their live is at risk and their ruler cannot protect them no more, it is then by the decision that their able to revolt against authority. However, only if their decision is supported by the majority. In John Locke theory, citizens are able to rebel against their government by the breach of contract: inability to protect their natural right of property. These notions of how citizens of a state can revolt against authority differ. Other differences appear apparent with the limitations of the ruler(s) and therefore the authority that the head is permitted to…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes and Locke both thought government was unfortunate, but essential. Thomas Hobbes wrote in Leviathan that without law there would be chaos. He writes “The notions of Right and Wrong, Justice and Injustice have there no place. Where there is no common power,…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes is a well renowned philosopher, specifically in the world of political philosophy. His work the Leviathan opened up revolutionary ideas that were beyond his time. Hobbes wrote the “Leviathan” during the English Civil War, a war caused by religion and violently ending with the beheading of the king. Hobbes watched this madness unfold, leading him to extend a “helping hand” over to England authority, by publicizing a solution for all to read. His work introduced a radical topic by the name of “Social Contract,” which proposed that a person’s morals and/or political obligations are dependent on an agreement to form or coexist in a society.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good Vs Evil

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Good and Evil in Our Life People can identity the difference between good and evil based on their nature. According to Samuel Johnson, education gives us the power to discern or see the good from the bad, and to “prefer” the good. We can see that a good person would volunteer with nonprofit organizations, donate money to charity, stand up for others, and help people without expectations. While an evil person would murder people for their possessions, hurt people, tell lies, take advantage of others, and do theft. The nature of good are doing actions that benefit others, and being selfless.…

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays