How Did Hideki Tojo Lose Ww2

Improved Essays
Hideki Tojo was a tremendously stubborn Japanese leader that refused to accept our terms, in surrendering, to create peace in the global community. Instead the Japanese would not surrender, so the US proposed an idea that if the Japanese do not surrender the US will bomb them. Tojo learned his lesson when he was bombed by the US. He was a man looking to take over the world and not let anything get in his way. This selfish behavior led to major problems in his country's future like a huge economic downfall and losing World War 2. The losing of World War 2 led to the proposal of The Potsdam declaration, which stated many terms including: anyone who had authority during this time were executed, and any land conquered by the Japanese goes back to the allies. One other part of the Potsdam …show more content…
This is where we knew this would end the war right away, and we felt terrible knowing that many civilians would die, but this was the only way we can stop there strong army. Shortly before we dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, we poured in tons of leaflets on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki, Hiroshima, and many other potential targets. We dropped over 5 million leaflets warning civilians of the soon to come attack. We knew we had to warn the civilians to get out of their cities or else we would be considered as a terrible inhumane country that has no respect for other people. Are goal was to destroy their ability for Japan to create war or else we would have to come in with strong force from air and sea that was projected to have many more casualties. It was either a lot of people die or a ton of people die and we did not want to wipe out so many more people, so the bomb was the only way to go. This is why the United States of America was right to drop two atomic bombs on the horrendous japan to end the war and protect many, many people that would be victims of conflict

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It had appeared that the Japanese were not going to surrender the way America wanted them to. Of course a big reason why the bomb was used is that if Japan would have been invaded, the death toll could have potentially reached half a million or more instead of the hundreds of thousands that were killed by the atomic bomb. It is said that if the war had continued the amount of American lives lost could have greatly diminished the amount that was killed by the bombs. It is hard to tell what could have really happened but it is certain that if the war had continued so would the loss of…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    due to its large military, “The total strength of the Japanese Army was estimated at 5,000,000 men… the major fighting would not end until the latter part of 1946, at the earliest” (Document #3). The size of Japan’s military and the estimated prolonging of the war provided the U.S. with an uncertainty that they would not have liked to accept. To eradicate this uncertainty and provide a rapid end to the war, the U.S. took the opportunity at hand and launched both atomic bombs. In the end, this decision proved triumphant as they evaded a lengthy battle with Japan and ended the long, treacherous…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Dropping the atomic bomb was the only correct decision for the United States because of casualties being less than what they would have if America had invaded, the brutality of Japanese towards the American POW, and the importance of intimidating Stalin. By dropping the Atomic bomb, the United States rightfully saved thousands of potential lives. After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the amount of Japanese lives lost totaled to 105,000. (Doc E)…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firebombing Dbq

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One theory is that dropping the atomic bomb was absolutely necessary. There are several key points to this argument, that the Japanese would never surrender unconditionally, that war would drag on, that a land invasion would be costly, long, deadly, and the bomb was needed specifically to end the war swiftly and with as few casualties as possible. “At the time, there was a wide consensus in support of the decision to strike among the members of the committee. Stimson was very adamant that the bomb be used”.⁴ A key part of the problem was the belief that the Japanese would never surrender.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bulge Dbq

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1945, Allied triumph was inevitable. Hitler momentarily pushed the Allies back into France with a surprise counterattack that made a giant bulge in the Allied lines. The Battle of the Bulge was the single largest battle ever fought by the U.S. Army and inflicted 70,000 American casualties. However, the German assault failed. By March, American troops had made its way into Germany.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are several reasons the atomic bomb was necessary to use against Japan towards the end of the Pacific War / World War II. The first most obvious reason was retaliation against Japan’s surprise attack on the United States Naval Base Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941. The bombing of Pearl Harbor left the United States with over 2,400 military casualties and 20 destroyed or damaged ships. The attack on Pearl Harbor was one of the sole reasons the United States had declared war on Japan. With the war with Japan still raging on by 1945, United States began closing in on the homeland of Japan.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dropping the bomb was the most logical decision because it caused the least amount of deaths by the end of the war, demonstrated through the United States scientific advancements and weapons, the least amount of casualties and property damage, and the social values of the Japanese society refusing surrender. The atomic bomb was not only important in ending the war, it was also an important advance in technology. The scientists who created the bomb were not positive of the fact that the bombs would work. The scientists valued the need to test the bomb if the bomb worked it would bring a stronger destructive power to the United States.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hirohito was Japan’s Emperor and head of state during World War 2, and was on the throne during the atomic bombing as well as the postwar period, his reign ending upon his death in 1989. Hirohito condemned the use of the atomic bomb, saying in his August 14th 1945 radio broadcast after accepting the Potsdam Declaration: “The enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable, taking the toll of many innocent lives. Should we continue to fight, it would not only result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilisation.” This displays Hirohito’s belief that the bomb’s power would not only bring about Japan’s destruction, but it’s continued use in war would affect the whole world.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped bombs killing thousands of people on Japan, which effectively ended the Second World War. The bombings against Japan were necessary because they had warnings and a chance to surrender, things could have ended up worse, and most of all it protected the lives of the US. Japan didn’t have a direct warning that the US was going to bomb them, but there was a statement encouraging Japan to surrender while the bomb was still being talked about. Japan didn’t surrender. For months we dropped more than 63 million leaflets across Japan, warning them of bombings.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ww2 Ethical Dilemmas

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is morality? Surely it can’t be taking men, women, and children to a camp because you don’t like the color of their skin, their religion, or even what people from their home country have done. Sure, the Japanese bombed us first. But does that make it right to bomb them back? Twice at that.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Toyotomi Hideyoshi Legacy

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ”(Britannica.com) Toyotomi Hideyoshi again knew how to keep chaos from erupting after his death. He ensured there would be no one who could take the throne from his legitimate son and that all of Japan could see his…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teetering to Surrender: A Critical Analysis of “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration” Individuals see “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration,” by Sadao Asada, as tedious and boring. Including names of different articles and historians can seem useless and insignificant, however I challenge you to see the strengths within this piece. Asada’s academic article puts entertainment and emotional appeal aside to discuss a different side of the Hiroshima bombing then previously emphasized, due to new information. As a result, Asada’s factual article presents a convincing case: the atomic bombs and Russian pressure were both necessary for Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues In Ww2

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    September 1, 1939, as Hitler’s power grows, Germany invades Poland, kicking off what will later be known as World War II. Within days, a number of other countries had joined in, turning out to be the largest conflict in history. The countries that opposed each other were known as the Axis and Allied powers. Though United States was neutral at the beginning, during the war, accumulated a few allies. The United Kingdom, being a small island nation, was one of them and very dependent on The American aid of importing guns, ammo, and other necessities.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays