How Did Harper Lee Have Published To Kill A Mockingbird

“I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality... I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word.” On December 10, 1964, Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. gave his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize to a full auditorium at Oslo University. Less than 20% of the attendees were black. They sat in their own area, sonorously separated from the white men and women attending. What do you think of this? One-hundred years after the Civil War. One-hundred years after the African-American population was granted citizenship in the United States of America. Three years following Harper Lee’s publication of To Kill A Mockingbird, and fifteen and a half months after King’s most famous speech, the I Have A Dream speech. Yet there was still racism abounding in the US. Malcolm X protested with violent acts …show more content…
Harper Lee should have written and published To Kill A Mockingbird, unveiling the shroud over racism, for three reasons: she merely alluded to her actions in a single plot line, the minor character Reverend Sykes slyly revealed her actions, and the nation listened to her accusations. The first reason Harper Lee should have written and published To Kill A Mockingbird, unveiling the shroud over racism, was that she merely alluded to her actions in a single plot line. For a moment, envision a chameleon, an expert at hiding from predators. Only those who are made aware of what to look for can find it, and even then, with some difficulty. The same pertains to the action I speak of, where Lee softly subscribed to what she was using the book to