How Did Benjamin Franklin Think It Important To Support The Constitution

Decent Essays
Evi Vayts
Constitution Closing Speech

1. Franklin thought it was important to support the Constitution so that the people around and the future generations would feel as one united nation that can keep going.

2. I think it would fall apart quickly because there wouldn’t be one higher law that everyone would need to follow, there would just be small groups that would always fight and never accomplish anything.

Summary: Benjamin Franklin didn’t fully agree to the Constitution, but he believed that one day it would be possible to believe in what it says. He thought a general government is necessary, even though eventually it will turn into a harsh ruling country because of the corruptness of people. There is no better option than this Constitution,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd. Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from. The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It gave them a chance to start a new form of government without a king. The only problem was Hamilton and Jefferson did not have the same idea of the type of government they wanted to accomplish for their new nation. Hamilton wanted to accomplish a strong central government. He wanted a government that would be able to control the people’s behavior. He understood that “sometimes good people do bad things and bad people do good things”, this gave Hamilton an advantage because Jefferson did not recognize this.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Balance of power has put states on check with each other, but there is nothing to put a world government on check because it would be the top authority. Because it is much a difficult issue to tackle, I feel like world governance is the best solution for now, until a situation is big enough push the need for a world government and force the creation of it. But then, there comes the issue of acting too late. Considering the risk of acting too late, I think I am for a world government simply because the world might not be able to afford acting too late. Yes, some nations will not benefit as much as other, but the world will benefit if issues like climate change gets…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, I believe that the men throughout the world and the men within American leadership did not have complete good intentions as Wilson did. As a part of the First World War, Woodrow Wilson created a 14 point plan to spread democracy and he genuinely believed in this plain to be successful. However, when he presented this plan to others, they did not agree and they did not want to back up this plan fully. I believe if they had supported Woodrow’s plan more, than democracy could have been spread much more efficiently under these circumstances. After World War I Wilson was all for promoting democracy however the leadership of America at this time made actions that would guarantee problems to occur later within Europe against America.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same Sex Amendment Essay

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    You cannot just go to the president and say “hey the people don’t like this amendment we have to change it”. Amending the constitution is a drawn out process, because if it were that easy people could change anything they did not…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People would not want this type of dystopia, but he stated that the world needs to find a balance between the two extremes. He took a particular interest in eugenics in which the human body could be modified to fit the needs of society. So he wanted a government system, where ones with higher IQ’s would be the leaders, he was worried about the worlds future. Where it would be governed by people unfit to do so, and there would be no alternative because of the current education system where such as America is not producing as many scientists or doctors as for example India, or china. With out future hanging in the balance he simply wanted people to listen, if not with his words, then perhaps his…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitutional Compromises

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The representatives ended up compromising and picking a government system that votes by the state AND population. This is a symbol of democracy because the representatives came together to agree on combining both of these ideas as a majority, rather than one central power picking only the Virgina Plan or visa versa. The great compromise was the first step towards democracy. If one central power picked only the virgina plan, it would 've causes most representatives and citizen to be stuck in the same position with the article of confederation, where they ended up unhappy with the government situation. If this did happen, it might have resulted in another constitution being written which there would be no promises the following one would be great either.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    American Greed Analysis

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As I do notice, however, that the times where citizens try and revert the government back to a more Creedal like system, things are generally better in the United States. But that is not what the government is in place for. It isn’t in place to be an individualistic body that just does things every once in a while, but generally remains incapable of doing something against the individual. The government is created to be that strong, central power that sometimes has to do certain things. Generally, the job we ask our government to do is essentially unwinnable for them.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Few of the Anti-Federalists influential figures such as George Mason, and Patrick Henry argued that ratifying of the constitution would result in problems evolving the nation to a completely new and unreliable government. Unlike the Federalists, the Anti-Federalists have differing positions on why the constitution should not be ratified; however, all its delegates preferred the States weak alliance under the Article of Confederation compared to the national government power under the constitution. The Anti-federalists formed a coalition with the Federalists by forging with James Madison, Thomas Jefferson a semi-federalists as he agrees with views from both sides, and others who came to realize the national government may gain too much power. They then used the ratification arguments of the federalists asserting that the power of the national government is limited, and the federal government has exceeded those powers. Regarding to the citizens, most of the citizens were against the Anti-Federalists view, as they believe the nation is weak enough already, and a centralized power is exactly what it needs.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays