How Did Andrew Jackson Contribute To Indian Removal

Improved Essays
As the 19th century began, westward expansion was a problem for Americans as Indian tribes were living there. Andrew Jackson was very persistent on the Indian removal before and after presidency, that it would take years of war to forcefully remove the tribes. In this essay, I will explain the background history leading to the removal act. I’ll also go in depth about the reasoning and those involved towards establishing land beyond the Mississippi. Thomas Jefferson, before the Louisiana Purchase, had an agreement with Georgia in 1802. The state of Georgia had territory that he was trying to gain by promising to secure the Cherokee land title in the state. After the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, Jefferson planned to put pressure on the Indians by exchanging the land they owned as a payoff for the trade debts they acquired. In the year of 1814, the Creeks military power would be destroyed by Andrew Jackson (who was proponent of the …show more content…
Native tribes like the Creek, Cherokee, Chickasaw, and Choctaw were no match for Jackson war against removal. Finally, in April 1830, Jackson’s proposal to congress was finalized and was passed by the senate. In Jackson’s years of presidency to the end, almost 50,000 eastern Indians were moved west of the Mississippi River. Almost seventy removal treaties had been signed resulting, east of the Mississippi, to millions of open land now to the settlers. In conclusion, the presidency of Andrew Jackson would affect the Native tribes before and after with his Indian Removal Act in 1830. Jackson wanted more land for his settlers and would stop at nothing to forcefully remove tribes east to the west of the Mississippi. President Jackson’s years in office resulted in an enormous amount of land, but nearly 4,000 Cherokee lives were taken in the removal and is now known as the “Trails of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson impacted the lives of Indians after he signed the Indian removal act of 1830. This was supposed to be a peaceful process for the Indians, but caused many problems, and forced Indians off of their land. There were protests from both Indians and whites who did not agree with the Indian Removal Act, but whites wanted more land. The Indian Removal Act was a turning point in American history because of its impacts in Indian culture, Native relationships with Americans, and the creation of new laws.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This sought to negotiate the exchange of Indian lands in the south for new lands in American territory (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). The Jackson Administration urged many Native Americans to sell their land and move out of the southern territory which a ajority did; however, the Cherokee Indians refused to move and went to the Supreme Court (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 253). The Supreme Court eventually ruled that the Cherokee Indians be allowed to remain on their land, but Jackson decided to force them out of the southern territory, along a Trail of Tears, that ended in Oklahoma (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). Many people criticized Jackson for these actions, calling them inhumane and cruel, but Andrew Jackson’s focus was for the interest and welfare of the people of United States. Even…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution empowers Congress to regulate commerce with forging nations, and several States, and Indians tribes. In the negotiation between the Indians and the government, the Indians acknowledge themselves sovereign nation.as under the protection of the United States government and no other Jackson recommended Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. That act gave the President the authority to give up land in west Mississippi River to Indians that would give up their land to the government. The Law allowed the Indians material and financial assistance to get to their new location. Jackson's government succeeded in general terms.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This action caused the Indians to suffer, and many of them died along the way. Jackson’s message to congress regarding the Indian removal explained that many Indian tribes were becoming extinct and asked congress to consider setting aside territory west of the Mississippi specially for the Indians (Doc. J). This proposal was used to solely benefit the eastern territory to benefit farmers and working men by opening up lands. Jackson benefitted himself economically at a cost, which was removing the Indians from the territory without their consent, proving his egotistical behavior. Correspondingly, responses from the Cherokee tribe verified Jackson’s injustice.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokees goal was to keep their lands because they were one of the major tribes being affected by his policies. Basically, the case was to prohibit white-Americans from First Nation lands unless they had a license. Unfortunately, Jackson’s inaction when it came to enforcing these rulings resulted in consequences for the First Nations. Overall, the Indian Removal Act passed by Andrew Jackson violated the treaties set by the First Nation made to keep their ancestral…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson listened to them and created the Indian Removal Act. He presented it to congress and they debated it. Eventually they approved of it and Jackson enforced it. Jackson thought this would be the best way to preserve their cultures and keep peace among the Americans and the Indians. In 1832 he was reelected.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unlike any other presidents the United States had seen before, Jackson was not a politician and he was not well educated unlike his predecessors and running opponents. Although controversial, Jackon’ s Indian Removal Act of 1830, relocated thousands of Indians from their lands that they had lived on for hundreds of generations. This did however, allow the US to gain a substantial amount of land. As a military leader, Jackson successfully led his Tennessee troops against the Red Sticks People in the Creek War. He also ended the creek war with the victory at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1830, Jackson put forth The Indian Removal Act, which proposed that all of the Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River would be moved west, into Indian Territory. Through this, Jackson believed that he was helping the Indians because in his opinion, having settlers and Indians living in close proximity was not beneficial to either group (“Indian Removal Act” 1). This Act was controversial because many Native American tribes were already promised land, which they were now being forced to leave (“Indian Removal Act” 2). The Cherokee Indian tribes living in Georgia were strongly against the Indian Removal Act due to a treaty with the state claiming that they could keep their land as long as they wanted if they assimilated into American culture (O’Brien 3). The Cherokee tribes had kept their end of the treaty by speaking English and sending their children to schools, but the state of Georgia wanted the land because they had found gold there and the land was fertile for growing cotton.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Jackson supported The Indian Removal Act. The Act forced the Indians to move west of the Mississippi. The Indians believed they should not be removed from their home land, and the Cherokee sued the government. The Cherokee have won in court, and earned the right to stay at their homeland. This isn’t the case to Jackson; he still forced the Indians out to the west.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the greatest developments of the 19th century was the Industrial Revolution, as it paved the way for a new way of living in America. New forms of technology and transportation contributed to the increased expansion from the established eastern cities to the western frontier. Although this expansion created many new possibilities, there was still people who felt expansion was detrimental to the nation. Between 1800 and 1855, supporters and opponents of territorial expansion influenced federal government policy by urging the government to act, or not to, on expansion debate that would affect the future of the nation. During the 1800’s, America was ready to expand but the French held control of New Orleans and the Louisiana territory,…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It forced the Native Indians to surrender millions of acres of land and to move to west. Throughout the removal many Indians suffered through sickness and death. The Indian Removal Act not only removed the Indians from their rightful lands forcefully but also is responsible for over 4000 deaths of the Native Americans, that today is known as the ‘Trail of Tears’. Bibliography Calloway, Colin G. Kill the Indian and Save the Man 1870s-1920s. (In Bedford/St. Martin’s (Ed.), First Peoples: A Documentary Survey of American Indian History, 4th ed., 2012) 412-483.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people were caught up on the Indian Removal Act, mainly the Trail of Tears. In Feller’s article, he does mention it and says it actually happened during Martin Van Buren’s presidency even though Jackson’s law led to it (Feller). The Indian Removal Act allowed the president to negotiate with the southern tribes, asking for their land in exchange for them to move west of the Mississippi River (Wikipedia). Supposedly, it was voluntary; although, in a roundabout way, the Indians would want to if they wanted to survive.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 1814 and 1824, president Jackson negotiated treaties that divested southern tribes in exchange of land in the west; whereas the tribes agreed to some of the treaties, they did so strategically with the aim of appeasing the federal government, protect themselves from white harassment…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trail Of Tears Essay

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Trail of Tears was a dark turn in Native American history, which also affected Mississippi during Andrew Jackson’s presidency. Jackson’s Indian Removal Act forced out the Native Americans out of their land by the federal government and walk thousands of miles to designated territories across the Mississippi river. This was caused by white America’s urge to expand and grow cotton in the southern states. Since majority of the states was owned by the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Seminole, and Creek tribes Almost 125,000 Indians preoccupied the states of Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, North Carolina, and Florida during the 1830s since the time of their ancestors. This issue boiled over when white settlers were infuriated by the population of Native…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays