How Can Congress Avoid Impeachment?

Improved Essays
Mr. President, it has come to my attention that Congress is considering impeachment due to your refusal to enforce certain provisions of several laws signed by previous presidents. As a domestic affairs advisor to your office, I have particular arguments you can use to defend yourself, the Office, and ultimately avoid impeachment. The arguments that will be discussed in this memo are to be used when you address the country to explain your position.
In the oath of the president of the United States reads, “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of the president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the constitution of the United States.” (Cullop) In Article II Section 3
…show more content…
In addition to “faithfully executing all laws” Article II of the Constitution tells the American people along with the elected representatives that “The president shall be commander in chief of the army and navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states…”If a former president passed legislature that prevents or presents a roadblock to the current president, the current president must do what is necessary to act as commander in chief. This notion allows the president to elude impeachment because he is respecting the duties of the president set forth in the Constitution. The president shall not enforce a law that prevents him from acting as commander in chief since this would be unconstitutional. Forfeiting responsibilities as important as leading the armed forces would lead to the demise of our nation and discredit the office tremendously. The president should explain in his address to the people of America the importance of the role of acting as commander in chief. All clauses, responsibilities, and powers listed in the Constitution carry extreme weight and take precedence over all political desires. If a law infringes on the powers and responsibilities listed in Article II, then it is imperative that the president does not enforce these laws, even if Congress did pass them. This is a part of the beauty of our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some would say that that the framers of the Constitution limited the power of the President enough by giving some powers to congress, but the more valid perspective is that the framers of the Constitution did not limit the President’s powers enough because some powers of Congress have changed to be the President’s powers. In the constitution, the President has many powers such as being Commander in chief of the army, appointing ambassadors and supreme court justices, and making sure laws are faithfully executed. The President has all of these powers, but more recently, the President has taken over some powers that Congress is supposed to have. The framers of the Constitution gave the President too many powers.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With regard to impeachment, the President is on similar ground as the governor of New York and worse ground than the governors of Virginia and Delaware. The President's veto power is no more than that of the governor of Massachusetts. The governor of New York may forgive while the President may not forgive the cases of impeachment. I disagree with this because suppose the governor could be involved in a scheme and if exposed prior to actual activities pardon all accomplices. The president could not shield others from impeachment and conviction for similar acts, but the governor of New York has superior powers to the President, he not only appoints but also can cast an approving vote if the council of four senators is divided on the appointment.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can be argued that the president is not in charge of creating legislation, and that the president is to play a role in foreign relations, and that by giving him, the president, the power of the military, that in itself is an argument made by those that support ratification. However, the power to declare war rests in congress and not the president, in which the president is only in charge of the military when war has been declared. The imbalance of power between the three branches of government is a problem that the constitution creates, but that is not the only problem. The other problem that the constitution creates is that the federal government does not provide specific liberties within itself in which the federal government will protect. Those…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is largely the case because the president sees his position as one that does not need Congressional approval under the faithfully executed clause in the oath of office which is largely interpreted on a subjective basis. Which means that under the constitution, as commander and chief, a present sees is position as one that does not need Congresses’ approval and that such legislation violates the constitution as a whole. Essentially, the president understands the wording in the constitution to mean that the positon of president, and that position alone, has sole authority over the armed…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Federalist #51, “In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates,” meaning congress is the most powerful branch of the government, but the founding fathers believed the president should serve as an additional check on power. A perfect example of why they wanted the check on congress’s power is what Madison stated in federalist #51, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” This means that if congress becomes too powerful then the president can check congressional power and vice versa. The president can convene congress and has veto power. The president can call Congress into a special session, as described by the constitution, on “extraordinary occasions.”…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power shall be vested in a President of the United Statesv." But Scalia ignores the concomitant clause that states "Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departmentsvi" as well as the sweeping powers given to Congress through the Necessary and Proper provision. Necessary and Proper gives Congress the means to make laws concerning the execution of federal powers, so it can hardly be a violation of principle for Congress to decide a mode by which an executive power should be implemented. Scalia fails to realize that the abstruseness of the Constitution prevents a true formalist outcome, because any such inquiry would be an attempt to draw lines where there are none, and where none were meant be.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the president is able to pass executive orders to change policy, these orders may be defunded by congress, counteracted by congressional legislation, or deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In addition, although a president is able to veto legislation, if a president continually vetoes legislation, the public may not look on him/her favorably, which would impact their electability. These factors seem to limit the president’s power greatly; however, so long as the president’s executive order is not unconstitutional, the president still wields remarkable power, as Congress would need a majority opposition in order to defund the president’s executive order. Furthermore, many of the president’s constituents could be swayed if the president were to deliver a speech concerning the necessity of his executive order. The executive branch, being the largest branch in government, requires that the president divides his power among the vice president, department heads, and heads of independent agencies in order to accomplish all of the administration’s tasks.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slippery Slope Essay

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In January of 20ll the Naples Daily News published a Slippery Slope essay about To-Do-Lists and New Years resolutions. It was a very nice essay, sweet. Because of its sweet sentiment, I am posting it below. It still holds true. However, this time I am going to add a caveat with this introduction—we are no longer in sweet times.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress has the power to write and pass laws. The president of the United States get his authority to issue Executive Orders are found under two clauses in the Constitution. The first clause in Article 2, Section 1 states that the executive powers shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. The second clause that reference to the Executive Power is Article 2, Section 3, where it states that the president “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed (Maier, Pauline 2010). “According to the USA Today News, Hiding In Plain Sight…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The modern presidency is something of a media invention, partly out of convenience – we need a protagonist, a character through which to tell the story of American politics” (Achenbach). There is no argument that the President hold enormous influence on the nation and the world. By going public the President can gather support directly from citizens for a certain law, bill, treaty, war, etc., and while he or she might not be able to rally the entire nation in his or her favor, an address from the President has a tremendous pull on the nation or will at least get the world talking. But when it comes to policy making, the President influence is much more limited. For example, although the President can institute executive orders, these orders can be overturned by congressional hearing, judicial review, or the next president in office.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Conflict between the President and Congress Efren Arambula Texas A&M International University The Conflict between the President and Congress Public policy is generally a plan of action adopted by the government to solve a social problem. The American Recovery and Reinvestment and American Jobs Acts was established Franklin Delano Roosevelt; therefore, it was his answer to resolving the Great Depression. Emergency agendas anticipated to influence the financial activity, and it required national and state governments to collaborate (Berry, Goldman, Janda, Manna, and Schildkraut, 2016). The national government proposed money to back up state relieve struggles and states were frequently obligated donate their own money to management and administration (Berry et al, 2016). President Obama was the only thing keeping American together, and we are going to die with the current dictator, 45.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to an article on the Cornell University Law School, The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". This is one of the Constitutional rights that was given to us by our founding fathers. To impose executive orders and bypass congress is illegal and simply unconstitutional. So now that…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The power of the Executive Branch is limited through judicial review, which is a process where legislative action must be reviewed by the judicial branch to make sure it conforms with the constitution. Therefore, the president isn’t able to freely make decisions that could hurt the…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The President of the United States has many powers, those given to him/her in The Constitution, and the powers that are deemed constitutional by the judicial branch. The judicial branch is in charge of interpreting the laws and The Constitution. In American history, two ways have been implemented in the interpretation process. One such practice is the Restricted or Whig approach; this approach employs the idea that the President can only do things explicitly expressed in the Constitution. This practice was used until Theodore Roosevelt came into office, and after his presidency The Stewardship Theory began to rise.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the relationship between the president and congress is key in understanding American politics. Congress and the president cannot avoid engaging with one another, with a constitutional set up that demands they work together constructively. Congress has its roles to play in policy making as does the president. The president and congress are given certain powers in the constitution, that power is divvied up, so that neither one of these branches has too much power at one time (Fisher 2007). The founders of the constitution were very distrustful of the presidency and feared if the president was given too much power it would lead to demagogy (Dickinson 2008).…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays