How could people who had such appreciation
How could people who had such appreciation
Also with all the land they owned how did they control it all and keep everyone doing what they're supposed to do.all the mongols did was kill everyone and not make peace with any other countries. Overall the mongols had positive and negative consequences from conquering so much land. But even today we still use things they use like hospitals and orphanages. And because of the mongolas we have cultural…
The Mongols were people from Central Asia who came together to establish an empire which lasted from 1206 CE to 1368 CE. They were herdsmen and tradesmen who herded sheep and goats, and were nomadic people. Even though at first the Mongol community was small, they were able to expand by conquering China, Persia, and Russia. The Mongols were culturally destructive and constructive to a moderate extent in Persia during the 13th century because they positively influenced academics while they subjugated agriculture.…
Genghis Khan and the Mongols were willing to go to great lengths to succeed in conquering Asia. In fact, they went much too far. Although they did do many great things for the economy of the towns they conquered, and they held many admirable beliefs, that does not excuse the fact that they killed a very large amount of people and they did so in terrible ways. Genghis Khan had incredibly strict rules for his men. Document 2 states that if a group of 10 people flee from battle, then the other 90 people that were part of that group all get put to death.…
Coupled with the fact that they didn’t spare children or animals this is one of the main things that made The Mongols truly barbaric. Another way the Mongols show they were barbaric in the past is by burying their prisoners alive upside down{Document 5}. Not only did The Mongols bury their prisoners alive but they also tortured them before they died which proves how much much hatred and disrespect they had for their enemies Altogether The Mongols were ruthless killers and that made them barbaric.…
In essence, the Mongols were civilized and influential thorough Eurasia by enforcing their laws, recognizing and accepting different religions, and developing new…
The mongols have taken over city after city and killed so many innocent people, yet can they be barbaric for killing people. A reasonable answer would be,”Yes” as killing someone isn’t right. The mongols go overboard, to execute their rivals and dig them upside down.(Document 5) This doesn’t compare to what the us has done. The U.s Launched the “Little Boy” in 1945 killing 80,000 humans and later with radiation killed more.…
Mongols, referred to as barbarians, named after the ancient greek word “barbaros” , meant for foreigners, was a negative term referring to people lived beyond the civilization and were savage or evil. Located mainly on the east central Asian plateau, the mongols appeared in different areas, as in Russia and Vienna. Many still consider them mysterious, considering they didn’t have a written language, no permanent homes, no metal works, and not much artifacts to track them down. Only two Mongol texts have survived, which both show the violence that was implemented into their society. The mongols conquer was a messy process, people have said that the slaughter was so great that the streets were greasy with human flesh and fat.…
Given its military prowess, the Mongol Empire was able to stretch its territory to an extraordinary level--the four corners of the border were marked by Poland, Egypt, Java, and Japan. (Weatherford 214) The empire covered most of Asia and tiny parts of Europe and Africa. Despite the suffering from the warfare, the areas under the Mongol rule “were able to enjoy a unprecedented century of political peace with a commercial, technological, and intellectual explosion unlike any in prior history.” (Weatherford 214)…
Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World is a narrative that presents a look into the life, and accomplishments of Genghis Khan, and the legacy he and his successors had on European civilization. The book depicts a more sympathetic view on the Mongols, that is contrary to the popular belief that they were a tyrannical group with a dark nature. The author, Jack Weatherford, a professor of Anthropology at Macalester College, delves into the life of Genghis Khan and the many victories he and his military claimed throughout his lifetime. Weatherford resurrects the true nature and history of Genghis Khan, from his relentless and powerful rise through Mongol tribal culture, to the waging of his countless successful wars and the expansion of civilization that the Mongol Empire created.…
The Mongol Empire is known for their barbaric ways like warfare and torture, which scared many people, they also made significant contributions to politics, economic development, and cultural diversity to many lands. Although the Mongols slaughtered entire cities and had rules that were barbaric, they were also in charge of trade routes, enforced important rules, had communication systems, and were religiously tolerant. The Mongols were somewhat barbaric because there were many parts of their civilization that were advanced. Documents 2,3,4,5 and 10 show how the Mongols were barbaric. In document two, it says that in battles, if one man ran away the whole group of men would be put to death.…
DBQ: How Barbaric were the "Barbarians"? Although Mongols were strikingly ruthless through their military tactics (Doc. 2, 3,4,5), they were able to develop a rather sophisticated society (Doc. 7, 9, 10) and executed noteworthy and structured accomplishments (Doc. 1, 6, 8). As shown in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5, the Mongolians are quite infamous for their questionable harshness considering their military techniques.…
The Mongols and the Europeans had many characteristics that were similar and characteristics that set them apart. They both had strong attributes that set them apart from any other group of people; they were powerful in their own way. It was the Mongols during the third wave civilizations era that created the largest and influential empire of that millennium. Their empire reached all the way to Eastern Europe and it was the Mongols that brought regions together into a single interacting network. The Comparing and contrasting of two expansive cultures will provide us with a better understand of how their connection pushed us into the global integration of the modern era.…
The Mongolian and Roman Empires were both vast and expansive empires. Both societies were able to accomplish tasks that no other empire had previously achieved. Although both empires were extremely successful in very similar ways, there were many differences between the two vast empires. This paper will explore both the similarities and differences between the two sprawling empires. Similarities…
The Mongols were horse riding people that began gaining power in 1130 A.D and their empire collapsed in late 1368 A.D. They were known for their warfare methods, which were extremely unique at the time because they rode on horseback and completely destroyed every surrounding civilization they went into war with. The Mongols were also known for having one of the most iniquitous rulers of all time, Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan then passed the empire on to his grandson, Kublai Khan. Throughout this paper I will be discussing how the Mongol Empire was founded, how their education system worked, daily life, housing, how horses became such a big part of the Mongol Empire, Genghis Khan being in power, warfare for the Mongols, passing the empire on to Kublai Khan, and contributing factors of the empire ending in 1368.…
With his extraordinary military accomplishments and leadership skills, Genghis Khan was a warrior and ruler who united all the nomadic tribes in the steppe of Mongolia and built the largest land empire in the world in the thirteenth century. He left a great legacy through his innovative ideas and laws whilst also promoting religious freedom, allowing an exchange of the global economy between Asia and Europe (Weatherford). However, with a belief that there should be only one ruler under the sky, Genghis Khan was unlikely to forgive those who refused to join forces with him and vanquished millions who wanted to create empires of their own. This presented an image of him and the Mongols as brutal savages who eliminated entire cultures, devastated…