Their study was separated into five experiments in order to examine the relationship between the predictive accuracy of a stimulus and the amount of processing that was associated with it (Kaye & Pearce, 1984). In the first experiment, the researchers wished to examine the effects of appetitive conditioning on the observational response (OR) to a light. The conditioning was done over six sessions where the rats were presented with food after a pre-exposure of 10 seconds to the light. Similar to the experiment done by Holland (1977), Kaye and Pearce (1984) observed the rat’s behaviours during the conditioning. In contrast, their study defined rearing as the rats making contact with the light with either their snout or paws (Kaye & Pearce, 1984). Their results for this experiment differed greatly from those obtained from Holland (1977), in that Kaye and Pearce (1984) found that rearing decreased from approximately 45 rears in the first conditioning session to approximately 20 in the final
Their study was separated into five experiments in order to examine the relationship between the predictive accuracy of a stimulus and the amount of processing that was associated with it (Kaye & Pearce, 1984). In the first experiment, the researchers wished to examine the effects of appetitive conditioning on the observational response (OR) to a light. The conditioning was done over six sessions where the rats were presented with food after a pre-exposure of 10 seconds to the light. Similar to the experiment done by Holland (1977), Kaye and Pearce (1984) observed the rat’s behaviours during the conditioning. In contrast, their study defined rearing as the rats making contact with the light with either their snout or paws (Kaye & Pearce, 1984). Their results for this experiment differed greatly from those obtained from Holland (1977), in that Kaye and Pearce (1984) found that rearing decreased from approximately 45 rears in the first conditioning session to approximately 20 in the final