Homosexuality Redefines The Institution Of Marriage: Article Analysis

Improved Essays
b) Homosexuality Redefines the Institution of Marriage According to the Christian Institute (2012) the concise definition of marriage is the voluntary lifetime union between one man and one woman. This definition does not in any way include LGBT coupes. In effect, it explicitly establishes that Protestant Christianity views marriage as a union between the opposite sex, one that is immutable and cannot be altered (Christian Institute, 2012; Alliance Defending Freedom, 2015). In this regard, Protestant Christianity argues that the legalization of same-sex marriages that will see LGBT enjoy equal marriage benefits like their heterosexual counterparts, essentially reconstitutes the institution and definition of marriage to accommodate a union …show more content…
As a matter of fact, the Christian Institute (2012) argues that in the Bible, God expressly gave authority to Adam, a man, and Eve, a woman, to procreate and fill the earth. Therefore, according to Protestant Christianity, in order for procreation to occur, certain faculties must be satisfied, and the presence of a male and female is one of these chief faculties. Protestant Christianity fronts the question as to how LGBT couples hope to procreate, given the fact that such unions are constituted primarily by individuals belonging to the same sex. Even though other scientific means for LGBT couples to obtain children exist, Protestant Christianity states that this is in direct conflict with the divine command of God, and hence morally …show more content…
And is the legalization of same-sex marriage consistent with the US constitution? In regards to the first question, contrary to common perception, the illegality of the sexual orientation of LGBT people is not founded on the constitution; rather it is primarily embedded in public attitudes and opinions, most of them based on religion. This expressly means that the US constitution does not define what sexual orientation is. As such, this choice is intrinsically left to the individual to determine whether they are heterosexual or LGBT. In regards to the second question, the US constitution under the Fourteenth Amendment expressly provides for the equal protection of all US citizens under the law. By denying States the ability to discriminate, the Fourteenth Amendment essentially upholds the rights of LGBT people. According to Reinheimer (2006), because the sexual orientation of LGBT is an affirmation of their gender identity, the constitution inherently protects such minority groups. As such, the ruling by the Supreme Court is indeed consistent with the US

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This article we read(Our Mutual Joy: The Religious Case For Gay Marriage) by Lisa Miller (569-576). Whether it be political or personal, Millers purposes are very one sided about the many arguments she shows us throughout her article. That is how most writings should be, the article makes readers really think about each issue at hand and what the article entails. What is your take on the subject, how does reading this impact your own views?…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traditionally, marriage has been referred to as a union between a man and a woman. In marriage, it is a “commitment of both partners before God to love, honor, and cherish each other – in sickness and in health, for richer or poorer” (Miller 177). In recent years, gay marriage has become an epidemic in societal news whether it is acceptable by God or not. There have been many opponents against gay marriage all with “Scripture as the foundation of their…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of what defines a marriage has highly been disputed over the past century. In 1996, the U.S. government passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of one woman and one man, and allowed states to ignore same-sex marriages granted in other states. This federal law stood until June 26, 2015 with the case Obergefell v. Hodges, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 stating that no state can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-sex couple had proven to be as a stable and equal as opposite-sex couples and the state was not legitimately protecting the morality of society by putting one group down at a lower level when it came to rights, recognition, and protection. The Obergefell case restored the definition of equality to be generally applied that now meant the recognition of same-sex couples under the federal law. Although at the time of ratification the controversy did not involve the dispute of whether same-sex couples would be protected under this amendment, this case shows the continuation of the disagreement in what equality entails. These cases clarified that the constitution was not only color-blind but also blind to sexual…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Constitution, same-sex couples have the same rights and benefits in regards to marriage as any other couple. Additionally, there are continual challenges to these rules, such as the case of the Alabama Supreme Court, keeping both sides of this issue active in defense of their views. As promised, the question remains as to which side of this argument I may fall in line with. On one hand, you have people/groups that want to keep traditional religious and family values intact by reinstating DOMA, on the other, you have people/groups that say this law violates an individual’s basic rights. It is my opinion that the U.S. Supreme Court got it right, no matter an individual’s preferences, they should be guaranteed equal rights as any other individual.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers wrote the Constitution to establish a solid government for the newly formed United States there was no way they could have predicted how much the country would grow and change. The laws and rights they included in the constitution were for there time but they also made the smart decision and leaving some of it up for interpretation and also leeway. The debate over The Supreme Court’s decision to legalize gay marriage in the United States today relates to the debate over making the supremacy clause apart the Constitution of the United States in the 1700s for the reasons of both taking away power from the states and giving that power to the federal government, both override state constitutions, and gave the minorities rights. (slavery)…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will admit, this scientific-minded argument sounds logical, yet it does have some fallacy. I assume that because homosexual couples cannot produce children, natural selection sees them as “unfit”. First of all, the human population has billions of people and is essentially only growing, so homosexual marriages are not really a factor in this case. Second of all, gay marriage is legal in mostly developed countries, whose inhabitants have relatively comfortable lives, making natural selection also a non-issue. This bias seems to be rare but it is, nonetheless, still bias that should not be tolerated when making…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay marriage is such an arguementive and aggressive topic in today’s society. Even though it is becoming legal many people still have their own opinions on this topic that will not change. In the article I read it talks about children who are adopted into families with homosexual parents. The author is not talking to one particular group of people. He is more or less likely trying to bring attention to all groups of people both young and old.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary of “Cake is His ‘Art’, So Can He Deny One to a Gay Couple?” The article “Cake is His ‘Art’, So Can He Deny One to a Gay Couple?”, written by Adam Liptak and published by The New York Times, introduces a problem between religious belief and the sex orientation. On July 2012, a gay couple, David Mullins and Charlie Craig, visited Masterpiece Cakes, located in Lakewood, Colorado, to order a cake for their upcoming wedding. A Christian baker, Jack Phillips, refused to make a wedding cake for the same-sex couple due to his religious belief.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holden affiliates with two other men who display homosexual tendencies or are described as displaying them, Carl Luce and Mr. Antolini. Salinger purposefully connects the three males through their attraction to older women, which is possibly a means for the men and boy to conceal their true sexual desires. Carl Luce is dating a Chinese woman who is "in her late thirties" (Salinger, 145) while Antolini is married to a woman who was "about sixty years older" (Salinger, 181) than him. Holden himself is attracted to Mrs. Morrow, as seen through his personal observations of the woman. He said, "she was very good looking" (Salinger, 54) and "had quite a lot of sex appeal" (Salinger, 56).…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is argument all across America over whether gay and lesbians should have the right to marry. There is argument about whether legally same-sex couples have the right to marry. In the article “In Defense of Traditional Marriage” Ryan Anderson made arguments against same-sex marriages. He argues whether the government has a right to create a new civil right and then redefine marriage as well.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The LGBT community consists of members that are lesbian, gay, bi, and/or transgender. This paper will address the question of whether the United States should make an amendment for the equal rights of the LGBT community. An amendment is an article that is added to the United States constitution that obliges states to follow. To be able to create an amendment, the amendment must be approved by three-fourths of the states. Three-fourths of the states means that at least thirty-eight states would have to approve the amendment in order to generate the new amendment.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell Summary

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Finally, in Obergefell, Kennedy’s rationale is primarily focused on the scope of protection that opposite-sex couples have in contrast to same-sex couples. Kennedy shows that the application of fundamental liberties and their protections need to distributed in the same manner. He specifically notes that “there is no difference between same- and opposite-sex couples with respect to [the] principles, yet same-sex couples are denied the constellation of benefits that the States have linked to marriage and are consigned to an instability many opposite-sex couples would find intolerable”. Then, he explains that the right to marry is one of the most important fundamental liberties because it protects the most intimate relationship between two…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe that the amendment goes against basic civil rights. I’ve reached that conclusion years ago actually. Despite that writing, this has caused me to still analyze why I believe the way I do. Although I am young and considered influential that is not the case in my decision. The issue revolving around same-sex marriage reminds me of similar discriminations against people based on their race and skin color.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subject of homosexuality has been at the center of heated debate and discussion over the last few years. People from tradition family some people call it a "sin" and "uncharacteristic," while others feel nothing is wrong with it. In fact, some go so far as to say it is a real lifestyle choice or "orientation" that is even equal to heterosexuality, even to the point of supporting same-sex "marriage" and openly, practicing homosexual ministers in the stages of our churches and other places of respect. Families with a strong stress on traditional values were supposed as less accepting of homosexuality than were the low traditional families. Those who work with teenagers need to be aware that some will recognise their sexual orientation as…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays