John Leland Homophobia And Inequality

Improved Essays
Although homophobia is not talked about as much as it used to, it is still a very apparent issue in both the United States and surrounding countries. In two recent articles I read homophobia was an issue in both. Neither article specifically talked about homophobia but both articles help prove that homophobia and inequality against the LGBT community is still going on and needs to be put to a stop. I read both articles “Parenthood Denied by the Law” by John Leland and “Pop Culture Still Fails Queer People” by Nico Lang. When you compare the two articles, the content is not very similar but they both address the underlying issues of homophobia and inequality. In the first article John Leland discusses the custody issue concerning two lesbians. …show more content…
It is important to expose the way homosexual couples are mistreated. Showing the world exactly how unfair homosexuals feel would shine a light on truly how hard of an impact not being able to use the law like you could if you were heterosexual. Why should this be a problem, everybody should be treated equality. How can the law say “if Ms. Paczkowski were a man in the same position, the law might point towards a different ruling”(1). It shouldn’t matter who is loving the child, whether it be two moms, two dads or a heterosexual couple. How can we say the heterosexual couple would be a better parent to the child? Gender plays no part in the ability to love therefore, we need to stop using it as an excuse when it comes to the law. The author of the second article I read would agree with the first author in the fact that a heterosexual couple does not have the ability to love a child more any more than a homosexual couple. The author of the second article would also advocate that the homophobia needs to stop in the United States. It is unfair to keep gays and lesbians off of television, and it is unfair to act like they don’t exist. The author Nico Lang makes you question how much of the homophobia is still around in the United States. I never realized it was as big of a problem as it still is. Truly I thought in today’s world that everybody accepted everybody no matter the ethnicity …show more content…
You never realize that something is happening until it is brought up to your attention and you truly understand what is meant. In the first article by John Leland I was shocked to hear that this was ever a court case. I did not ever hear of this happening until I read this article. It is shocking to see a judge say something like “if you were a man”. This world is so based off of gender, and who should be in charged based on gender. This world we live in is a man’s world. In the case that more situations arise like the court case Leland mentioned, I think it is more important to look and evaluate the home life. How can you make the statement that the child can no longer see the parent that took care of him for the beginning years of his life solely off the of the fact she is a women, and was not married at the time the child was born. This article should be exposed and the laws should consider changing because this law is simply unfair. The second article makes me want to become a television producer to simply play more shows with homosexuals as the main characters that come back every week. I think if homosexual couples were brought up more in the news, media, and on television, people wouldn’t think of gay and lesbian relationships as so foreign. They would see the relationship to be like a heterosexual relationship. It is important for people in the LGBT community feel safe and proud of who they are as a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In conclusion, Jordan wanted the state to restrict same-sex marriage but allow private homosexual acts between consenting adults (April Elliot). David Boonin does not believe that Jeffrey Jordan’s argument is sound here. Boonin’s thoughts on same-sex marriages are that governments should sanction them and that people should have the right to marry whomever they want. Boonin adds that Jordan’s second claim is problematic because he does not do a good job of distinguishing the public disagreement. Jordan speaks of the public dilemma as two distinct subjects of disagreement (Rachels).…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The leaders of this country need to step up and realize all of the downfalls that legalizing gay marriage brings. In addition, Cristofaro & Wilkinson (2003), agrees that homosexual marriage is in no way similar or even follows God’s plan for marriage and family, marriage is holy and gay acts go against the natural moral law. God’s plan for marriage has always been to be between a man and a woman and to have a family together. Same-sex marriage goes against every moral law there is. Legalizing same-sex marriage will be one of the biggest downfalls for the American…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People who are homosexual were deprived of the same rights that heterosexual people had. Some believed that same sex couples shouldn’t have the same rights as opposite sex couples because many do not sanction this as a real relationship. For the most part in America a real couple is defined as a man and a woman. The government not only denied couples their rights but it also allowed and encouraged discrimination in the country. By not allowing same sex couples their right to marry showed that the government agreed with individuals that homosexuality is morally wrong.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Homosexual Marriage

    • 1098 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Then loving the same sex should not bring problems. Like stated previously, since gay marriages are only legal in thirty seven states the cause that permits people to be who they are has had a great impact on the gay community. Homosexual people are humans and are discriminated against because they think in a different way. In 2015 homosexuality has become part of the everyday life. Many nations have legalized same sex marriage, but it ought to be legalized in each state; as a result, a group action of same sex marriages would solely change our society and culture but it will also culminate associate abundance of violence and discrimination of gays.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believe same sex marriage is a sin and that homosexual couples should be punished. They don 't think it 's right for two people of the same gender to get married because they believe marriage was created for man and woman. They also believe same sex marriage deprives children from having both a mother and father role in their lives. According to them, same sex marriage "offends" god. Same sex marriage should be legal because it 's a civil right.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is unjust for any persons human rights to be set aside as less because of their gender. No gay marriage has equal opportunity or same rights unlike blessed heterosexual couples, people have conformed to the notion that same sex marriage is a diversion from a different sex union. Cockburn continues on the subject with the statement:" There 's a fork in the road for progressives. One path is sameness, expanding a troubled institution to same-sexers. But that path detours the real problems of relationships today and their official recognition" (Cockburn).…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of the people say by legalizing gay marriage is going to have undesirable effects. People disagree on legalizing gay marriage because they will not know what will happen next. They think that it will turn our community into a bad community. In the article, “Defense of Marriage Act” states, “This act specifies that no state is required to recognize a same sex marriage performed in another state,” (para. 1).…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Furthermore, Ted Cruz explains that “marriage is a fundamental building block of our society” and he doesn’t believe in gay marriage or LGBT equality because it “an act of naked and lawless judicial activism” (HRC). This opposing argument explains that if gay people enter a relationship with the opposite sex, it can turn them straight. Moreover, republicans who do not support LGBT rights believe that homosexually is a choice and homosexual attraction is something that can be…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discrimination among Orientation "One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all". If we are an equal, free and fair country, what makes gays and lesbians so different that they need to have bills and laws passed to just for them to do what a traditional family can do with no problem? Gays and lesbians are consistently denied their rights that are usually taken for granted by the average American. It 's unfair to categorize gay and lesbian couples when they are human beings just like everyone else. They have the right to be happy just like everyone else.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As William Baude of the New York Times stated, “Polygamy should remain illegal because it would increase gender inequality and social instability” (Baude). These the things The United States has worked so hard to instill into our society…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays