From Lucretius, Aristotle, Leonardo da Vinci, to Darwin, Smith and Lamarck, many
Philosophers, artists, and scientists have produced theories of evolution in attempts to explain the living and non-living creatures around them. ‘Charles Darwin’s grandfather, Erasmus Darwin…”a British physician and poet… proposed that life had changed over time.” “The possibility of common descent based on changes undergone by animals during development…”Evolution is a fact, the theory of evolution explains how evolution works. Although, the theories of Creationism and Darwinism will always have their separate supporters, and most will never change sides no matter what evidence comes to light. I believe the evidence of evolution is all around us in the world with humans being the most obvious and …show more content…
It has both modern and primitive (apelike) features, and is really baffling the scientists. Naledi had a very tiny brain and large body, which doesn’t make sense and its hands and feet were almost modern. It’s a whole new species of Homo Naledi that is still being dated, it might be 3-4 million years old. These Homo Naledi were found in a cave, not washed in, or drug in by animals, and there is no other way in but down a chute. The archaeologists think they may have buried their dead in this cave, and that would be a completely human character, not an apelike one. So the question also is, “What is it that makes us human”, because that’s what it really is about Darwinism that upsets people. People don’t want to be associated with the apes, even if it was millions of years ago. But just because a creature had a small brain doesn’t mean it wasn’t smart, or maybe wasn’t human. H. Naledi will be a new species that rewrites the human tree, and will show another path that Mother Nature, or God, or evolution, took. There were many paths, such as, H. Habilis, H. Erectus, A. Africanus, and many
Philosophers, artists, and scientists have produced theories of evolution in attempts to explain the living and non-living creatures around them. ‘Charles Darwin’s grandfather, Erasmus Darwin…”a British physician and poet… proposed that life had changed over time.” “The possibility of common descent based on changes undergone by animals during development…”Evolution is a fact, the theory of evolution explains how evolution works. Although, the theories of Creationism and Darwinism will always have their separate supporters, and most will never change sides no matter what evidence comes to light. I believe the evidence of evolution is all around us in the world with humans being the most obvious and …show more content…
It has both modern and primitive (apelike) features, and is really baffling the scientists. Naledi had a very tiny brain and large body, which doesn’t make sense and its hands and feet were almost modern. It’s a whole new species of Homo Naledi that is still being dated, it might be 3-4 million years old. These Homo Naledi were found in a cave, not washed in, or drug in by animals, and there is no other way in but down a chute. The archaeologists think they may have buried their dead in this cave, and that would be a completely human character, not an apelike one. So the question also is, “What is it that makes us human”, because that’s what it really is about Darwinism that upsets people. People don’t want to be associated with the apes, even if it was millions of years ago. But just because a creature had a small brain doesn’t mean it wasn’t smart, or maybe wasn’t human. H. Naledi will be a new species that rewrites the human tree, and will show another path that Mother Nature, or God, or evolution, took. There were many paths, such as, H. Habilis, H. Erectus, A. Africanus, and many