Both stories bring all the facts together beforehand and then begin to solve the crime. What they do with the criminals is what is the main difference seen here, in King’s story, he lets the perpetrator go like nothing ever happened. “Looks like attempted robbery hone to something worse. I saw it at once, of course.” (King) Here Lestrade is covering for the murder of Mr. Hull by speaking with the constable about it. In The Final Problem, not only does the criminal die, but Holmes does as well. The men of Moriarty’s gang get convicted for their wrongdoings as well. “Tell Inspector Patterson that the papers which he needs to convict the gang are in pigeonhole M., done up in a blue envelope and inscribed “Moriarty.” …show more content…
He wanted to bring in the subtle happiness of the characters and the gruesome ways the murder together to form the perfect tone for this short story. The Final Problem gives a tone of enthusiasm in the beginning to a very depressing tone in the end. Not all Holmes stories follow this guideline, most are rather enthusiastic with a happy ending for Holmes and Watson. Stephen King gave the readers what they needed to know to realize that it was indeed a Sherlock Holmes story. You could definitely feel it was a story written by King, without knowing who the author was before reading. There are many similarities and differences between the classic and the remakes. They can come from the characters, how the crimes are solved, how they handle the suspects and even the overall tone of the story can be altered upon. Being that there is so many remakes of this story, it is up for the reader to chose which version they like the