Hobby Hobby Suing Case Study

Superior Essays
A Womans Right

Tori Wraga

The underlying value behind Hobby Lobby suing is that they believe women having premarital sex is immoral. More than 30 years ago women fought and won the right to birth control. Fast forward to 2014 and the Supreme Court rules that Hobby Lobby, owned by evangelical Christian David Green and his family, doesn't have to pay for health care coverage of contraceptives prohibited by its owners' religion. Women are again fighting for their rights and are still having to justify that having sex is not immoral and doesn’t make us bad people. Seth Rogan’s tweet on Twitter this summer says exactly how I feel, “The people at Hobby Lobby are assholes and those who voted to let them be assholes are also assholes.” (Rowles)
…show more content…
This decision pitts woman's private medical decisions against her boss' religious beliefs. With this Supreme Court decision, women lost. This decision is an insult to women and a real slap in the face made by five male supreme justices who will never know what it’s like to have to use an IUD or decide to take a morning after pill. A woman may be choosing to use an IUD not because she doesn’t want children, but because getting pregnant could kill her because she has pulmonary hypertension, or congenital heart disease, or maybe her previous birth control methods have failed. It might even be that she is choosing an IUD because she has a heavy menstrual period resulting in anemia. An IUD can help regulate a woman's period. Although a bit expensive, an IUD also is the most reliable contraceptive on the market. Or maybe the woman is choosing the morning after pill because her partner’s condom broke during sex and she can’t possibly afford to get pregnant right now. The method of contraception should be her choice, not her employers. Most women understand what is best for them. Some 99% of women will use some form of birth control at some point in their lives. They don't want their bosses, for any reason, getting involved in their family planning decisions and violating their woman’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This also impacted private religious small businesses and for-profit businesses because they feel that they can also fight and be exempt from following certain rules against their religion. In addition to that, women in general will be negatively impacted by this court ruling. Many women may feel that their right to contraceptive was taken away from Hobby Lobby. Women have the right to make a decision on what they want to do to their own bodies. Corporations do not have a right to impact the decisions of these women or their…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main two groups involved in this case are the women who believe contraceptives should be given under the affordable care act. The other side consisted of people with strong religious belief that believe ones the egg is fertilized it is alive. The religious group felt protected under the religious freedom restoration act. This act gives them a right to express their religious belief. Both groups that were involved were expected to be involved.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I thoroughly enjoyed reading the article, "Franchise Hostages: Fast Food, God, and Politics" by Robert W. Emerson and Jason R. Parnell. Prior to reading this article, I never thought about the possible negative effects that the freedom of speech has on a company. It made me realize that leaders of companies have to be cautious when speaking about politics. This highlights the fine line of free speech and politics. The examples given in this article show that when leaders of companies speak publicly about politics, there are likely negative consequences.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neil Noesen Case Summary

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 2002 Neil Noesen case, a woman in Wisconsin went to fill her prescription at a local K-Mart, only to be refused by the only pharmacist on duty at the time, Neil Noesen, because the aforementioned pharmacist was a strict Roman Catholic, and it would be against his principles to give someone contraceptives. In addition to this, he believed it would also be wrong to transfer the prescription so that it could be filled by someone else. The district manager knew Noesen would not dispense contraceptives, but was not aware that he wouldn’t at least transfer the prescription. In this situation, the issue revolves around the woman’s right to have access to birth control, and Noesen’s right to exercise his religious freedom.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This decision allowed medical providers to be able to give their married patients contraceptives without legal repercussions as faced by Dr. Buxton. Thus health care administrators had more opportunities to meet their patient’s needs. Health care administrator would be able to implement more family planning options. I) What do you think about the…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion when it comes to if Hobby Lobby not offering their employees contraceptives or Wheaton College choice to end all student health care was, ethical. My reasons behind why I feel this way is because for one, it goes against everything that Hobby Lobby CEO stand for. As for Wheaton College stopping offering health care to their students, I believe that it should be the responsibility of the student to have some type of health care and it should be the institution responsibility to provide that insurance. However, there should be a liability insurance in place just in case a student gets injured while on campus, but other than that the student should have some type of insurance. Hobby Lobby is a Christian based crafts store.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobby Lobby Case Summary

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As part of the Affordable Care Act’s implementing guidelines, group health care plans are required to include preventative care coverage, including methods of contraception. There were some exceptions where religious facilities and organizations are exempt from these requirements. After the Hobby Lobby case, the department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created some accommodations for certain non-profit organizations stating that they may opt out from providing contraceptive coverage by certifying their religious objection. By receiving the certification, they will be opted out from funding the contraceptive coverage but organization’s insurance company or its third-party administrator will step in, to provide the coverage. In 2014, the government provided a second accommodation for religious non-profit organizations to write a letter to the government in order to be released of any obligations to provide contraceptive coverage mandate in Affordable Care Act.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After only having the clinic opened for ten days, Griswold and Dr. C. Lee Buxton were found guilty and arrested with a fine of $100 each. Estelle Griswold and Dr. C. Lee Buxton had a strong enough case to be heard in the U.S. supreme court, their representative argued in front of the chief justice and associate justices that a state cannot pass a law that forbids all people to use contraceptives and it is forbidden to do so by due process in the first amendment, he also argued that the law was ever brought because it applies to married couples in to women’s whose lives may be at risk if they become pregnant on the other hand the state of Connecticut representative argued that married couples practice birth control because it still available in Connecticut. He also argued that the state did have the right to pass a law and their only intention was to reduce the chances of immorality and prevent intercourse outside of marriage. As a result of the case in the ruling, the state of Connecticut’s argument was not strong enough to persuade the non-associate justices, they agreed that the constitution does protect the right to married couples, the bill of rights state individual laws but when they are together they create a right to privacy against government invasion of citizen rights. For the final decision, 7-2 decided in favor of Griswold.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Jeffress claims that Hobby Lobby does not obstruct women’s right to obtain abortions or health care, and that the government compels Hobby Lobby to become complicit in a religiously objectionable act. This relates to the the Court’s argument that the contraceptive mandate does not fulfill RFRA’s requirement for the least restrictive means test. However, in Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union (2004), the Court, speaking on speech restriction under the First Amendment, describes the least restrictive means test as based on “available, effective alternatives.” Justice Ginsburg writes, “the Government has shown there is no less restrictive, equally effective means.” The need for easily accessible contraceptives would not be met with a program funded and administered separately from existing employee-based benefits.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is WRONG!! Engel v. Vitale (pg. 757) Engel v. Vitale. Majority of people have never heard of this Supreme Court case. However the impact that this Supreme Court case had was tremendous.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1973, the United States Supreme Court presided over the Roe v. Wade case. The justice’s majority opinion ruled in favor of legalizing abortion (Roe V. Wade, 1973). Unfortunately, state lawmakers recently passed regulations limiting and/or preventing women from exercising this constitutional entitlement. Social Problem Prior to the Supreme Court judgement in Roe v. Wade, women in the United States put their health in danger by seeking illegal abortions (Vecera, 2014). In the 1950’s and 1960’s, 200,000 to one million U.S. women sought unlawful termination procedures (Gold, 2003).…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Small family businesses are not forced to follow the mandate for the supply of birth control to employees as the larger traded corporations. From my own point of view, i personally believe that this ruling is not fair to those employees who work for them. They are technically forcing those who may want to utilize birth control to prevent a pregnancy, as well as to terminate a pregnancy before the embryo is viable due to their own belief. With that being said, there are cases where a person is personally truly not ready to have a child at the time and chooses to be a responsible individual by utilizing birth control to protect themselves and prevent such…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Women’s reproductive rights are a human right that cannot be taken away. Due to religion and/or lack of education, women do not have the freedom and privacy to choose what is best for their bodies. This social injustice is highly neglected upon because people feel uncomfortable talking about a topic that millions of women struggle with on the daily basis. Although women’s rights have improved drastically, women around the world still face oppression on a daily basis and women’s reproductive rights are rarely enforced.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1973, the case Roe v. Wade made a huge impact on the future of abortion. The Supreme Court made a historic decision and sanctioned a person’s right to choose whether they want to terminate an unwelcome pregnancy. Women were since allowed to make the decision of whether they wanted an abortion during the beginning of a pregnancy. If a woman waits till a later date, there are restrictions on abortion policies. During the…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reproductive health and sexuality is an important part of the human body. Being able to engage and sexual acts, and reproduce is the main reason for making sure you have a healthy body. Men and women should be able to receive and access any family planning method, that they need. Taking precautions and being able to control when you want to have a child, should always be in the right of the women. But in many countries women aren’t able to receive, afford safe and effective contraceptives.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays