Hobbes Vs Locke

Improved Essays
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke revolutionized the way in which the role of governmental authority was studied. They both introduced the concept of a metaphorical social contract constructed between the ruler and the ruled with the goal of creating a mutually beneficial relationship. In doing so, the human state of nature could be improved by the added order and stability the state would provide. Where the two theorists begin to split paths is in their perception of how much better off citizens should be after to submitting to authority, compared to how they were before in nature and the amount of rights that should be retained after entering into the agreement.
Hobbes’s life during the English Civil War undoubtedly provided him with a clear view

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atlantic Revolutions in a Global Context ¥ From the mid-eighteenth century to the mid-nineteenth century, a series of uprisings shook states and empires from Russia to China and from Persia to West Africa. ¥ There were several aspects of the North American, French, Haitian, and Spanish American revolutions that make them distinct and clearly part of the Atlantic Basin. ¥ The intellectual impact of the Enlightenment created a trans-Atlantic print culture, wherever ideas were changed and debated.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was born April 5, 1588, Westport, Wiltshire. Thomas Hobbes had different ideas than most of the other philosophers. He believed that people needed to be ruled by a king. The reason for this was because, he would state that people were naturally selfish and wicked. Thomas Hobbes thought it would be great for the government to have power over the people.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke points out the freedom of the ruled over the rights of the sovereign. Locke favors a legislature government over a monarch. He puts up in mind an administration with the fear of concentrated power. For Locke, the most horrible form of the regime is tyranny, consequently, as much as possible; he puts the power to the hands of the people, where Hobbes prefers the sovereign. The government of Locke obtains its rule directly from the citizens, whereas Hobbes’s monarch rules absolutely.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The famous political texts Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes and The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke have had a profound impact on what is seen to be the role of government in society, with the latter having more lasting influence, particularly in modern society. The former, in short, argues that men ought to submit themselves and all of their rights to an entity with absolute authority over them, and that no matter how this man, or assembly of men abuses its power, they ought not to resist this entity, as the alternative is a chaotic, violent world. Just by examining the thesis of Hobbes’ work, one would easily deduce that such an idea is contrary to the ideals lauded in our modern society, those being of certain inalienable rights, the rule of law, and the separation/limitation of powers. Locke presents each of these aforementioned ideals and explains them to be essential to governance for the common good.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes that without a ruler society will live in the State of Nature. This to Hobbes meant living in an almost civil war like society. Locke believed that in the state of nature people were good and honest, conflicts were resolved peacefully and justly. Locke believed that peace should be the status quo, and we can remain living this way as long as we respect each other. Hobbes believed that people can only live in peace when they turn over all rights to a sovereign.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The hypothesis of understanding made by the decision control and the current society is known as a social contract. This hypothesis partitions the power between the administration and the general public in a way that advantage the general will. Concerning the social get, the division of specialist between the decision control and the general public is the greatest debate among various thinkers. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) trusted that an entire government is best for the general will of a general public. He contended that most of the power ought to be given to the decision body than a general public.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order to leave the state of nature individuals must consent to the social contract in order to form a commonwealth. For a social contract to be enacted all members of society must agree to give up certain rights provided in the state of nature to create a civil society that benefits them all. The commonwealth for all three signifies an impartial power which makes the final decisions concerning matters in civil society. For Hobbes the social contract is created because people live in fear that another will harm them in their quest for self-preservation. While Locke believes that a social contract is needed to create an impartial judge because men cannot be trusted not to take justice too far, once the common good is no longer at the forefront.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper argues that Hobbes’ theory of civil order is made durable by the narrow conception of justice, the appreciation of education, the profound conundrum between Hobbes’ distaste and use of rhetoric and the reconciliation…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By comparing Hobbes’s theory of state of nature to Locke’s theory of state of nature, it can be seen that there are several different points and one similar point. The different point is that according to Hobbes, state of nature is referred as state of war, each individual did not trust others so that there were always conflict between human (http://www.angelfire.com/md2/timewarp/secondtreatise.html). However, Locke assumed that under state of nature, everyone should be treated equally, so that human live together peacefully (http://www.angelfire.com/md2/timewarp/secondtreatise.html). Furthermore, another different point is that Hobbes’s civil government has absolute power, but Locke’s civil government does not have absolute power. For Locke, if…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without it, Hobbes envisions a world in which there is “war of every man against every man” and exemplified his view of the state of nature as a brutal scenario where the life of man is “nasty, brutish, and short” (Jovanoski, 2014, p.334). Hobbes, being a materialist, mirrors a theory of conservative motion:…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays