Hobbes State Of Nature Essay

Improved Essays
1. What is the state of nature like for Locke? How is it different/similar to that of Hobbes? Locke says in the state of nature men kept their promises and honored their obligations, and, though insecure, it was mostly peaceful, good, and pleasant. Princes are in a state of nature with regard to each other. You are allowed to punish those who do you harm. Hobbes state of nature is summed up by his famous quote, “no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” 2. What are man’s natural rights? What is the natural law? men in the state of nature are free and equal, and at liberty to do as they wish—but only “within the bounds of the law of nature.” Individuals have a duty to respect the rights of others, even in the state of nature. The source of this duty, he says, is natural law. 3. Where does property come from? What does the labor theory of value mean? How do people acquire the right to property? How and why is private property justified? Whether by natural reason or the word of the Bible, the earth can be considered the property of …show more content…
What limits are placed on government? Do the people have a right to rebel? All laws and regulations of the commonwealth are based on the main principle of preserving property. The state is thus limited in that it cannot take a man's property away from him. If he has consented to the contract necessary to live in the state, his property is thusly protected by laws. The only way a man's property can be taken away is if he breaks his end of the contract and is therefore no longer under contract. People do have a right to rebel according to Locke. A governing regime or structure that acts without the consent of the public, and that insulates itself from the public it purports to represent has lost its right to rule. The more repressive that governing structure, the more legitimate the effort to overthrow

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I truly believe that genetics are by far one of the biggest factors in determining the action and/or morals of an individual. In this debate, I personally agree with Thomas Hobbes in the idea that the nature of man is evil and as he states, “Everything humans beings voluntarily do is for pleasure or for self-preservation.” I feel this concept is heavily shown through the fact that all human beings react differently if put in the same situation. This shows that even though one's environment will be the same as someone else’s, people's personality determines the morals and decisions made by said individual. For example, some criminals have safe surroundings and good environments, but still make the conscious decision to commit a felony.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each chapter explains a different part of how a government should be formed, where its authority should come from, and when it should be overthrown. Locke begins his work by stating the origins of men in nature, or how mankind existed before entering into civil society. Locke outlines the extent of man’s freedoms in nature; according to Locke man may “dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man. [4]” He then explains that man in the state of nature has no right to take his or any other man’s life.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes that without a ruler society will live in the State of Nature. This to Hobbes meant living in an almost civil war like society. Locke believed that in the state of nature people were good and honest, conflicts were resolved peacefully and justly. Locke believed that peace should be the status quo, and we can remain living this way as long as we respect each other. Hobbes believed that people can only live in peace when they turn over all rights to a sovereign.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. John Locke describes the “state of Nature” as total freedom. He says that people have the power to control their actions and get rid of their possessions or people as they please. In the “state of Nature” people don’t have to depend on another person and all people are equal. This state has its own law of Nature to govern it and the people are supposed to abide by it.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One issue with the state of nature was that people were free to do as they pleased, but they were not protected. In this state the righteousness of individuals could not be easily be enforced; there is the possibility that people will try to steal the birthright of others. Some individuals in the state chose not to obey the natural law. Locke writes, “And that all men may be restrained from invading others rights, and from doing hurt to one another, and the law of nature be observed, which willeth the peace and preservation of all mankind, the execution of the law of nature is, in that state, put into every man’s hands, whereby everyone has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree” to express the idea that people had the right to enforce the natural law by punishing individuals who chooses to violate it (9). Therefore, government is needed to enforce justice.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke addresses the state of nature to define political power as he sees it. He defines the state that all men are naturally in as “a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature,…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    6.2 outcome Name: Ethan Natural rights: there are three tips of Rights those are rights that you are born with life liberty and property because of john Locke. Consent of the government: traditionally, it is a government that protected citizens from any kind of invaders. oligarchy: means a small group of people having control of a government that can exist in limited protection. democracy: there are three types of government and they are the best way to protect the people's state a government is the system that a state or community is controlled Autocracy: means that it can be a dictatorship. there is probably more things to say but you have to do some work to.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that Locke is correct in his belief that there can be a right of ownership in nature. Over the course of this essay, I will look to provide evidence and arguments that support this position and show that law is not necessary for the right to possession. Locke argues that property rights originated when God created the world and that all men have a right to make use of this earth and what It produces in order to lead a more comfortable existence. Locke argues that in their natural state no man has a right to private use or ownership of these resources as they were given for the use of all men. Locke explains that in order for earth’s natural resources to be provide benefit in an individual man’s life, he must first…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the centuries, words and their definitions have evolved, within the political sphere. For instance, the notion of democracy as it is known today is diametrically opposed to the definition of democracy that was implemented during Plato's era, during which it was seen as being part of the worst regimes. One can also note the same pattern of variation, as far as the ideas of equality and inequality are concerned. For the sake of this essay, the definitions provided by Hobbes and Rousseau will be analyzed, as well as their views on the state of nature and on the idea of a social contract. “Nature hath made men so equal in the faculties of body and mind as that, though there be found one man sometimes manifestly stronger in body…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He for the most part disagrees with everything John Locke said. Locke says the state of nature for the most part is peaceful. Hobbes says the state of nature is actually a state of war. The only thing the two agree on is the need for a form government. For Hobbes In the state of nature there is no such thing as justice or injustice for that matter.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Because it doesn’t matter how much we complain about poor management of the state’ dealings and/or regulations imposed to us. There are no excuses for resisting power because it is the only thing between us and what we most want to avoid, the State of Nature. John Locke had a different approach as to the kind of place the State of Nature is, and consequently his argument concerning the Social Contract and the relationship between men and authority varies. According to Locke, the State of Nature is the natural condition of mankind.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The state of nature ties to his view regarding one’s vulnerability to be subject to harmful actions. One cannot fulfill the security of the first rule without a second derivative law. He writes, “…there can be no security to any man, how strong or wise soever he be…” (560 Landau). Given the nature of men, Hobbes argues that, any one man can’t live in peace in a state of nature (what is sometimes eluded to when he discusses relevant members being at war). An individual may maintain an advantage over another.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau all agree on the hypothetical starting point of the state of nature, but they disagree on the details. Both Hobbes and Locke agree that the state of nature is associated with the state of war, while Rousseau believes that man is perfectly stable and non-violent. In order to understand the connection between human nature and war, we have to analyze each philosopher 's point of view. In Hobbes ' work, The Leviathan, he emphasizes that nothing could be worse than a life without protection provided from a well-functioning state.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays