Locke, Montetesquieu, And Rousseau's Impact On The United States Government

Improved Essays
The writings from a few enlightenments had drastic impacts on the United States government. The constitution was formed around the ideas of Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau. There were many similarities in the writings of these men that have been implicated into the foundation of U.S. starting government structure.
Hobbes focused on having the people being protected by the government. He wanted to insure the commonwealth of the people and that the people wouldn’t betray each other. It affect United States when we had slaves, we didn’t give them equality and they had no rights.”Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States,
…show more content…
He wrote about how every man should be of the society and he has his own will; this is shown in our society with the way we are able to politically participate in the government. “In reality, each individual may have one particular will as a man that is different from-or contrary to-the general will which he has as a citizen.”- Rousseau. This statement supports that men will chose presidents whose policy will align with their will/opinions so that he can try to make his life more suitable. We have seen many examples of this happening today such as Florida is neither a republican nor democratic state yet is swayed every year.”The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”-Constitution.This is a natural Right that all citizens are provided with. He established that the government main concern should be about the well care of the people. He enjoyed the theory of direct democracy, but America didn’t institute that. Therefore, Americans elect representatives who make decisions for the people that in the best benefit for the …show more content…
He stated that the government should be separated into three branches: Executive, Judicial, and Legislative. Executive branch today is lead by the president. He is allowed to elect officials and can appoint a cabinet for himself. “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States”-Constitution. Judicial is composed of the Supreme court. The Supreme Court’s duty is to make sure that any law passed by the congress follows the constitutions rights or they can overturn it.”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”- Constitution. They are supposed to interpret the constitution, and make sure laws follow civil rights. But the judicial branch is the least powerful among the branches.”The Judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority”-Constitution. The Legislative branch involves the Congress. Congress is composed of the Senate and House of Representatives.”The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The enlightenment was one of the most revolutionary times in this world and there were lots of incredible and extraordinary thinker during this period of time, which all of them shaped and impacted the world but John Locke however was one of most revolutionary thinkers of that time that since he influenced and impacted how governments functioned and the power of common folk’s say in the government power and limits. Essentially John Locke principles influenced and profoundly improved on our understanding on how governments should function as said that “…..John Locke, was an outspoken supporter of equal rights within a governed society. He espoused the natural rights of man, namely the right to life, liberty and property, and he articulated that every government’s purpose is to secure these rights for its nationals. ”(Broers, 1) John Locke’s work on natural theory is famous and has been touched by other philosophers such as Thomas…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Enlightenment Dbq

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the 16th-18th century the Enlightenment many people questioned how they would be governed and how they would be treated. The Enlightenment was a movement that took place through England, France, Germany and other parts of Europe. This movement had an impact on the government and how people should be treated based on their sex. There were five philosophers that took part and the enlightenment movement: Charles de Montesquieu, John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Mary Wollstonecraft.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though Rousseau’s ideas differ there are also some similarities. Rousseau, like Locke, believed that men are born free. Both Locke and Rousseau agreed that men had certain natural rights that they should not give up to any leader. Rousseau believed men in a state of nature are free and equal, but in a state of nature men were very different; Rousseau described men in a state of nature as “noble savages.” The only way to notice the many differences in Rousseau’s thinking in comparison to Locke and Montesquieu is by first looking at his…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    JOHN LOCKE 1. What does Locke mean when he refers to the laws of nature? Describe what rights and liberties man would have living in a state of nature. Be sure to include specific examples from the reading. (2 pts.)…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founders of the Declaration of Independence sought to create a government that would be formed from the ideas and concepts that they had encountered through their various readings and studies. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are by far the most influential thinkers of the Constitution and continue to affect American thought even today. Many of John Locke’s ideas directly correlate with those included in the Declaration of Independence yet they are reworded to suit the needs of the new government.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau places a great deal of importance on the common good and therefore somewhat rejects personal freedoms. He believes that in order to be a part of the Social Contract, in which he believes man is free, personal freedom must be ignored. In the state of nature, man is free to indulge in their personal needs and freedoms and therefore must be disregarded in order to unsure the common good. If an individual disagrees with the majority, they are inherently wrong and should be forced to obey the general will. Rousseau states, “whoever refuses to obey the general will will be forced to do so by the entire community” (Rousseau, 150).…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke’s Second Treatise of Government allowed for the ideal that no ruler or government could do whatever they pleased because there were moral laws that encompassed all of society. However, Rousseau was adamant in his belief that man “is born free and everywhere he is in chains. ”1 Rousseau defended the right of the people to rule, he argued that the people were only accountable for themselves and the ruler or government had no right to subjugate the people. Locke and Rousseau’s idea of government are similar in the fact that they both embody some aspects of our government today. Rousseau inspired the phrase “We the people…”2 at the beginning of the Declaration of Independence because of his belief in the wisdom of the people to decide in their own affairs.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Rousseau, the general will is a collectively held will that aims at common good or common interest. People sharing common interest will make a better community, state and nation. He argues that by giving up individual rights and interests, people will comply with the general will. In addition, Rousseau says, that people should build a community to which they completely devote or surrender themselves “What these different interests have in common is what forms the social bond, and if there were not some point on which all interests agree, no society could exist.” (p 57).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rousseau And Religion

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Rousseau sees man in the regular state as a "noble savage", which means that Individuals will be willing to comply instead of disagreeing. Society, he contends, has defiled man. He considers violence to be a consequence of political life and its organizations. Rousseau is exceptionally disparaging of governments, and one could contend this to be a consequence of his consideration of pre-revolutionary France. A government’s function ought to be to aim for a unified society.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Maxwell James 9/29/16 Mr. Puzzo World History (H) John Locke and the French Revolution John Locke was a French philosopher and was interested in how a citizen and a government interact together, in times of peace and in times of tension. John Locke studied government and came to many conclusions; the role of government is to protect citizen’s natural rights: Life, Liberty and property. If a government wasn’t adequately protecting citizen’s natural rights, the citizens had a responsibility to overthrow that government and establish a new government that does better to protect those rights.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, the Judicial branch then evaluates the laws, and check if they are constitutional or unconstitutional. This process is called Checks and Balances, “The system of separate institutions sharing some powers… its purpose is to keep power divided among the three branches” (Turner,27). By this definition not one power is meant to be all powerful, although…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since a monarchy is based on the private interest of the ruler, it may be difficult to identify the general will in that society. In a society, Rousseau believes that every man is obligated to vote and voice his opinion, which falls under the general will category. There are two types of wills, the general and the private will. Under the general will, people vote in a deliberative democracy and members of the society vote for what they believe is beneficial for the general will and public. This procedure permits everyone being treated fairly in society but the method is fallible because of the natural greed of human beings.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Authority refers to a type of power which is seen as socially recognised, it also refers to the amount of power which someone or a group have over someone else. Legitimacy is a key concept in authority, it highlights the way in which authority is distinguished from general notions of power. Weber distinguished three different types of authority in the work that he done, the first type of authority was rational legal authority, this is dependant on laws of the state. The second type is traditional authority, this comes from different habits and different social structures and it is when power is passed from different generations and the last type of authority is charismatic authority, this is when the charisma of a certain person plays an important role. Weber later highlighted that legitimacy distinguishes these different types of authority from leadership and power and that people who are have a higher status feel like they may have more right to give out commands but this is based off of the legitimacy of authority which has been recognised.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Social Contract Author: Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1762) Introduction His books were a blue print on how Rousseau wanted to know the reasons of why the people gave up their natural liberty over the state of nature. How the political standpoint became such an impact in people’s lives. One of the things he did state in his book that stuck out to me was that, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays