Hobbes And Locke

Decent Essays
Hobbes and Locke are both accounts concentrated on transformation for creating the state and civil society by the state of nature. Nevertheless, they have different process of a developing stable state.

Locke insisted all people are born with equal. People are with certain inalienable rights by their nature and they could learn from their experiences. The State of nature is a state of peace. People have obligation duty of respect for others and retain the right to life and liberty to protect their property. The possession of property cannot be controlled by govern but need to be protected. Civil society leads the state based on morality to protect the right of the people. Locke mentioned to make people trust the government, the govern needs

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Both Hobbes and Locke have the same opinion on the formation of civil societies, however, their difference is from how they each think or feel that a civil society should be ruled or controlled. We all know that Hobbes is a supporter of the sovereign ruler with supreme power, while on the other hand, Locke sets the control in the hands of the people, and he does not want the power to be focused or concentrated to one ruler. In accordance with Hobbes, people moving from the state of nature into a treaty, in which they surrender all of their rights when they enter a contract with the all-powerful sovereign, creates a commonwealth. In contrast, the rights of the sovereign are absolute and cannot be controlled by the people. The sovereign or ruler cannot give up their supremacy, nor can the people be released from the agreement that they have with the sovereign.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cyrus The Great Dbq

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Locke played off of Hobbes idea that the sovereign must justify its exercise of power. In contrast however, Locke went much further into identifying human rights. Locke writes that: The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker. (Locke 107) Locke believed that in a state of nature all men are inherently equal.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both the Hobbesian and Lockean account of the state of nature rests on the notion of inherent equality, where there is no ascribed status or class. Everyone is essentially free to act as they will. Another point of similarity between these two philosophers is that self-preservation is central to the state of nature. They both believe that we enter a social contract to create a political authority because of the fear of death. Another point of similarity between Hobbesian’s and Lockean’s is they base their system on necessity.…

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes that without a ruler society will live in the State of Nature. This to Hobbes meant living in an almost civil war like society. Locke believed that in the state of nature people were good and honest, conflicts were resolved peacefully and justly. Locke believed that peace should be the status quo, and we can remain living this way as long as we respect each other. Hobbes believed that people can only live in peace when they turn over all rights to a sovereign.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The right of nature is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life. ”-Thomas Hobbes… Two strong-minded social contract theorists concluded two different outlooks on several different topics, one main topic being the state of nature. John Locke feels as if peace is and should be the norm, we can and should be able to live in peace without having to worry about someone fondling with our property or belongings. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, feels like everyone isn’t going to agree that certain things are good or bad because that’s based on opinion.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. John Locke describes the “state of Nature” as total freedom. He says that people have the power to control their actions and get rid of their possessions or people as they please. In the “state of Nature” people don’t have to depend on another person and all people are equal. This state has its own law of Nature to govern it and the people are supposed to abide by it.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Locke claims that the state of nature is a state of perfect liberty. People in the state of nature are completely free, equal and independent. They can entirely follow the guidance of their own wishes and maintain their possessions without asking others consent and obey any other command or authority, as long as they comply with the law of nature. However, Locke also points out the disadvantages of the state of nature that if it is so free, it will full of continual dangers as people's property are very unsafe and insecure in this state. Others may interfere and invade their property since there are no stringent observers of justice.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Government power has been found to be a necessary facet of civilized life, as such there are multiple views predominately found through the common theory of social contract, realized by famous thinkers, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Locke. Each of these individuals take an attempt in answering how government power should function. Additionally, these individuals elaborate on how said power should affect human living conditions. Hobbes, Rousseau, and Locke have different and somewhat opposite positions on the subject of social contract. For this reason it is necessary to explain each thinker’s position.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Locke’s Understanding of Natural Law Facts: John Locke’s belief of the state of nature is that no person has control over one another and natural laws, rules and makes all people equal, for every individual holds the executive power of natural law. As a state of equality, not a single individual has the power over another individual, and all are free to do as the please. Although a person can’t be held under authority by a distant king, if a person is responsible for a crime their own country then they can still be punished. He expressed that independence does not mean you have the right to exploit others because even the natural law prevails in the state of nature. He recognizes that legislative is the most important part of the government because the first rule of the legislative power is the…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The state of nature is viewed differently by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Hobbes views that state of nature and man in a negative light with everyone being only for themselves. Locke views the state of nature in…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He thought that without a government to defend the people against those wanting to take advantage of them, soon fear would take over. This would soon cause individuals to have the desire to protect the natural laws, such as life, liberty and property. Locke said that these are given up for payback, in return for…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He for the most part disagrees with everything John Locke said. Locke says the state of nature for the most part is peaceful. Hobbes says the state of nature is actually a state of war. The only thing the two agree on is the need for a form government. For Hobbes In the state of nature there is no such thing as justice or injustice for that matter.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke (1632-1704) is another modern political philosopher who also had strong views on political nature, but differed from Hobbes. One of Locke’s main hopes through his writing is to destroy the idea of monarchial theory: “it is impossible that the rulers now on earth should make any benefit, or derive any the least shadow of authority from that, which is held to be the fountain of all power, Adam 's private dominion and paternal jurisdiction; so that he that will not give just occasion to think that all government in the world is the product only of force and violence, and that men live together by no other rules but that of beasts, where the strongest carries it, and so lay a foundation for perpetual disorder and mischief, tumult, sedition and rebellion, (things that the followers of that hypothesis so loudly cry out against) must of necessity find out another rise of government, another original of political power, and another way of designing and knowing the persons that have it,…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau all agree on the hypothetical starting point of the state of nature, but they disagree on the details. Both Hobbes and Locke agree that the state of nature is associated with the state of war, while Rousseau believes that man is perfectly stable and non-violent. In order to understand the connection between human nature and war, we have to analyze each philosopher 's point of view. In Hobbes ' work, The Leviathan, he emphasizes that nothing could be worse than a life without protection provided from a well-functioning state.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays