Ratification Of The Constitution

Improved Essays
History is two-sided, which makes historians the lawyers of sociology. Each representative presents facts in order to persuade readers to believe their ideology. On June 21, 1788, the United States Constitution was ratified. This ratification would provide numerous points of debate for historians, for society was divided into two groups: the strict interpretationists and loose interpretationists. The division into two groups created two sides; therefore, ultimately creating a trivial subject for historians. The Constitution was a work of compromise, for delegates like James Madison and William Patterson worked together to create a system of government that satisfied almost everyone. In addition to the compromisation, the Constitution also …show more content…
Native Americans were hopeful their side would win, so America would cease the relevant westward expansion. However, this was not the case. The Constitution mentions Native Americans in the Commerce Clause, and grants them trading rights. The acceptance of Native Americans as trading partners is explained in the following statement, “The Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3) grants Congress plenary power to regulate commerce between the United States and three other forms of sovereign entities: the states, foreign nations, and the Indian tribes” (The Heritage Guide to the Constitution 37). Once American citizens learned of the alliance between Native Americans and Britain, they despised the Commerce Clause. Artisans and business owners refused to serve Native Americans, for they were the second enemy. After the War of 1812, Native Americans were abandoned because of their ruined economical status. American citizens did not conduct trade, for the Natives were traitors. The British did not conduct trade, provide financial support, or a military, for they lost the war. This is exemplified in the quote, “The British withdrew their financial and military aid from Native Americans on the western frontier, who were left to face increasing white settlement with no leader to unify them and no money or ammo to fight. Native Americans either moved west …show more content…
The Native Americans did not want to give up their land, so they attempted to fight back. However, their attempts proved meaningless, and they lost a leader in the process. This is highlighted in the quote, “Tecumseh and his followers had observed eastern coast and upper Great Lakes Indians being removed from their lands by settler expansion, and they had seen a domino effect as one removed nation encroached on another’s land” (PBS 1). Consequently, their loss of a leader resulted in an American victory, for their forces were weakened. This idea is explained in the quote, “But Tecumseh was mortally wounded, and his death and defeat marked the end of the native campaign to drive back white settlers. On a larger scale, the American victory cleared the way for the U.S. claim to the native interior of North America with more treaty negotiations following, resulting in numerous removals of most of the eastern woodland Indian communities to the west” (PBS 1). That being the case, Native Americans faced discrimination to a degree they had not yet

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As stated in a speech by a member of the Iroquois Confederacy prior to the war, “Your People daily settle on these Lands… We must insist on your Removing them, as you know they have no Right to settle” (Doc B). Previously allied with the French, who they viewed favorably, the Native Americans were not satisfied under the…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even the local Indians living inside the colonies were losing the trust and were deemed enemies by…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There’s a saying that questions “do the ends justify the means”? This means does the outcome outweigh everything sacrificed to get there. In the early to mid nineteenth century, America was hurt socially, technologically, economically, and politically due to the Trail of Tears, President Andrew Jackson, and Industrialization. Beginning in the late 1700’s and advancing into the 1800’s, the Native Americans that had lived in America for the past 12,000 years gradually lost the majority of their land.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I Casey Nichols representative of North Carolina fully support the long overdue ratification of the Constitution. The Articles Of Confederation are impuissant and short-lived. An continued absence of a new document that conclusively clarifies our affairs will inevitably lead us to defeat. It was unquestionably imperative that we held the constitutional convention. The rationale is quite evident considering all the affairs we don't have elucidations for.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    War Of 1812 Dbq Outline

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages

    With this threat, “…the Native Americans were forced to flee their way towards designated reserves.” The Natives were left behind and forgotten about by the British even though if they hadn’t joined the cause, the United States may have won the war and taken the land. Continuous American settling kept the Natives in constant fear and peril. Native lived for another one hundred years in this fear as the Americans did not stop settling west as they continued with their expansion of…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When Americans first arrived on the East Coast, the Natives helped them survive in the land. But the Americans kept pushing for more territory, causing some Natives to fight to protect their land. Then as the War of 1812 rolls by, the British begin to arm the Natives, encouraging them to rebel. But with the British backing away from the states after the war, the Natives lost some fighting power. The Americans still pushed and pushed for more land, especially in the great harvesting lands in Georgia, and some Natives fought back and back.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clair and his inexperienced soldiers were severely outmatched. However, the United States did eventually conquer the Indian Confederacy and claim the Ohio land. Several factors played key parts in the Americans' eventual success - some even comment on the fact that the Native Americans seemed to beat themselves. Even before the Battle of the Wabash, the Native American population was severely declining due to one factor from their European-Native neighbors: disease. Along with sickness, the massive amounts of Indians in the Ohio land shortened the food supply and the flooding of rivers devastated surrounding crops.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States constitution was signed and approved by the constitutional convention delegates in 1787, and it needed ratification from nine states as it is required in article VII of the constitution before it could be enforced. States that decided not to ratify the constitution will be considered a different country, and not part of the union. With this knowledge, the urge of the ratification led to a conflict among the delegates that resulted in numerous documents, essays, pamphlets, and articles. The conflict; perhaps debate consists of two opposing sides; the Federalists who wanted the ratification of the constitution, and the Anti-Federalists objected to the ratification. The Federalists led by Alexander Hamilton were in favor of…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    . Here in the states, the topic as of late is the constitution; whether ratification of the document should happen, or whether it should not be ratified. The year is 1788 and the debate about the ratification of the U.S constitution is quite the topic among everyone including everyday citizens, in which everyone has an opinion on the topic, myself included. The U.S has the articles of confederation in place however, state delegates believed that the articles where weak, and something needed to be done to make the government stronger.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Native Americans and Americans always have had a very tumultuous relationship. Starting from the first discovery and then colonization of the Native American's land; Americans pillaged and plundered villages, which purposefully depleted the Native American population. The tumultuous relationship boiled over when Andrew Jackson, known for his hatred of the British and Native Americans, signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830 (Tindall and Shi 342). The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Native Americans land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for the land in the south and in the east (Tindall and Shi 342). The removal of the Native American's was primarily for land and urbanization of that land, which were held by the Native Americans at that point.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Act Of 1830 Essay

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We treated them poorly and had made trade deals with them and we broke those deals, so of course they would be mad and fight for the British. In conclusion, the Indian Act of 1830 was not justified because it was illegal, unfair, and cruel. Moving the Indians off their land wasn’t fair, especially since the were there for so long. The Americans were unjust in doing taking the Indians land and they never had the right to do…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This not only meant that the tribes were getting pushed westward, but they were now losing more resources and hunting ground. By trading with the English, the Indians lost a lot of valuable land and…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The War of 1812 was considered a “second war for independence” from Britain – the first one being the Revolutionary War. Britain had, once again, strained foreign relations with the United States by ordering the impressment of American sailors and seizing cargo ships; even though George Washington had declared neutrality. However, due to a lack in communication, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were unaware that Britain had began to respect their maritime neutrality and it subsequently resulted in the two men ordering the declaration for the War of 1812. As a result of the declaration, the country was torn in half – one half; the Westerners and Southerners, were pro-war while the other half; the New Englanders, were firmly against the war.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Race and racial inequality have powerfully shaped American history from the very beginning. Americans think of the founding of the American colonies and, later, the United States, as driven by the quest for freedom when initially, religious liberty and later political and economic liberty. Still, from the beginning, American society was equally founded on brutal forms of domination, inequality, and oppression which lead to the foundation of two models of minority exclusion known as Apartheid and Economic/political disempowerment. Apartheid meaning “state of being apart” is “An official policy of racial segregation, involving political, legal, and economic discrimination against nonwhites” (Wk:3, Lecture 1). Originated in South Africa apartheid…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays